The aru caresWho cares ?
But using figures that are spent 90 percent plus in Australia to support an argument about NZ is pretty irrelevant
Why don’t you answer the question ??
Why is the nzru trying to keep the aru from collapsing ?
The aru caresWho cares ?
But using figures that are spent 90 percent plus in Australia to support an argument about NZ is pretty irrelevant
Like what one is followed every week for 7 months straight? That one? Or the 6 games at test level?We are talking about which will be the No 1 code in NZ
Imo ? Go ahead, tell me how many teams a domestic Rugby Union comp in NZ will have on what salary?
10 teams spending 3 million a piece? Even that isn't sustainable .
The aru cares
Why don’t you answer the question ??
Why is the nzru trying to keep the aru from collapsing ?
Like what one is followed every week for 7 months straight? That one? Or the 6 games at test level?
If you don’t care then stop respondingIt’s your opinion to say it’s an “inferior competition“ … plenty in NZ will think otherwise even if it was fully amateur
again ..I don’t care …
Wow this buffalo rules guy sure is digging a hole for himself hereLike what one is followed every week for 7 months straight? That one? Or the 6 games at test level?
If you don’t care then stop responding
/ end debate
The nzru are trying to help union in Australia because they can’t go it alone financially
OK so significantly less talented players, playing in front of a fraction of an audience for peanuts at a slower pace with no history or social relevance with a net worth of around 5% of the NRL. .. being inferior to the NRL is just my opinion? LolIt’s your opinion to say it’s an “inferior competition“ … plenty in NZ will think otherwise even if it was fully amateur
again ..I don’t care …
As usual you struggle to keep up with the debateThis is a debate about which code will be the no 1 code in. NZ..
If you want to talk about how much money the NZRU gIves to Australia…I suggest you move on
But but but Japan and FranceOK so significantly less talented players, playing in front of a fraction of an audience for peanuts at a slower pace with no history or social relevance with a net worth of around 5% of the NRL. .. being inferior to the NRL is just my opinion? Lol
As usual you struggle to keep up with the debate
The nzru doesn’t have the finances to compete with the nrl on its own
That’s the point
OK so significantly less talented players, playing in front of a fraction of an audience for peanuts at a slower pace with no history or social relevance with a net worth of around 5% of the NRL. .. being inferior to the NRL is just my opinion? Lol
How many teams do you think are in the Npc ?It’s not the point we are arguing you dumb shit !
How many teams do you think are in the Npc ?
How many top level sides can nz support financially for union ?
That’s the point you dopeAnd how many top NZ sides will their be in the NRL ?
That’s the point you dope
Nz is a tiny rugby market and needs Australia to stand on its feet lol
Thanks for giving me some laughs whilst I’m bored at home doing nothinglol - You are trying to argue about how small Union in NZ is ..because the NRL MIGHT increase from one team to two…
Thanks for giving me some laughs whilst I’m bored at home doing nothing
Reality is 2 nrl sides won’t see league overtake union maybe not even with 3 sides
Union has a junior base we don’t have and a semi pro comp which covers the whole country
Plus crowds for kiwis games are awful
League has a long way to go but the fact it’s even being discussed is a good thing
Just saying league is taking over from Union jf we get a side is like afl is taking over in Brisbane we need another nrl side.