Pretty sure it does (round ten is before any origin games and no tests were played)
And the figures were only to round ten
So after a full season of both the league is way out in front
Few variables that mean you can interpret it a number of ways, NRL for instance has much more games so shouldn’t the cumulative audience have a much better chance to be higher?
With 5 teams vs 1 team Super Rugbys highest rated round game outrated the Warriors highest rated round game- could be argued Warriors should be 5 times higher? Or 2.5 times if 2 NZ teams are playing?
Data was not full season, did Warriors ratings slump as their form did? Did interest wane once Warriors were out of contention? Did super rugby increase in the race to the finals?
From the partial dataset released both sports increased with NRL 3 percentage points more but also stating super rugby rated higher- way too many variables to say league is way out in front