What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Newscorp And Rugby League

beave

Coach
Messages
15,563
Ummmm, you forgot the doyen of all things Rugby league and booze.......

phil-rothfield.jpg
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
When he was doing the sideline for Triple M the other week, Tallis kept putting shit on him whenever he came up with some interesting fact.

Mascord puts all other league journos to shame. He should be the RL expert on the various sports show panels. Idiots like Hooper and Massoud should be told where to go.

I have a lot of respect for Andrew Webster. Brad Walter goes ok too. Basically the fairfax crew at the moment are top notch.
 

maccattack

Juniors
Messages
1,250
I dont get why Steve Mascord would be comfortable if league gets less money.

How is it acceptable that the top rating sport gets less?
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
I think it's important to remember that we don't have any direct competition with AFL in terms of players.

Getting slightly less or slightly more money than them is more of an ego boost than having any real effect in the Australian code war.

NRL needs money to
-pay its players competing salaries with the top Rugby Union comps around the world - NOT AFL
-maintain its dominance in NSW and QLD
-grow its presence in Melbourne and NZ and expand into Perth and other areas

To achieve this, we need less money than the AFL needs for their equivalent, given their larger squad sizes and lower expansion opportunities. They're pushing shit up a hill in QLD and NSW and have nothing whatsoever overseas. Their method of expansion is to throw money into a blackhole. The NRL could currently expand 2-4 teams with no financial outlay other than the extra club grants.

We don't need to beat the AFL in pure $ terms to win the war.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,446
Executive Co-Chairman of News Corp and 21st Century Fox:
"I'm not surprised at all that the Brisbane Broncos are a winning team under Wayne," Murdoch tells Fairfax Media. "But the strength and speed of the team's resurgence is a credit to both Wayne's genius and work ethic but also that of the whole team and back office. Wayne is a true leader. A developer of footballers and men. He is also a man of integrity and moral courage, both somewhat unfashionable virtues in which I place tremendous value."
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...s-around-with-tough-love-20150820-gj4bvk.html
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,446
I don't even think describing this article as pathetic does it justice, it's hilarious!

Gyngell couldn't give two shits about foxtel and telstra. But somehow poor gyng was strong-armed by Smith into making a deal that guaranteed rugby league would stay on ch9, poor gyng must feel so violated & used...

Funny how they now admit to knowing the NRL wanted more games on FTA, where before they were apparently blindsided.

Nine CEO David Gyngell warned NRL boss David Smith over secret deal

Nine Network chief executive David *Gyngell advised under-fire *National Rugby League boss David Smith that he risked sidelining the code’s long-term partners Fox Sports and Telstra if he insisted on striking a TV rights deal without them.

Sources close to the $925 million talks said NRL chief executive and Australian Rugby League Commission chairman John Grant put pressure on Nine to enter exclusive talks with the code, casting Nine as the player holding the “catcher’s mitt”.

One source inside the secret talks said rugby league bosses became “very aggressive” in the weeks leading up to the August 10 announcement, and “railroaded” Nine as part of a controversial plot to split the rights.

“The NRL had taken a very firm view they wanted more games on free-to-air television,” a source said. “Nine was pushed into trying to do a free-to-air deal with the code whether they could or couldn’t. They pushed hard for a separate deal.”

It is said that Mr Gyngell tried to bring Fox Sports and Telstra to the table amid fears NRL bosses were cutting the pair “out of the deal” by leaving them “outside the room”.

The bombshell revelation shows Mr Smith was not only *determined to gain more expos*ure for the code on free-to-air television to raise the profile of the sport, but also at any cost, even if it meant souring relations with two major commercial *partners.

Fox Sports and Telstra have poured billions of dollars into the sport, standing firm with continued financial support even after the publication of a report two years ago into doping and links between sporting codes and organised crime.

There are also suggestions the code is in breach of its own governance standards for failing to enter into due diligence by sending an official tender *document.

Shortly before the NRL began a short exclusivity period with Nine to agree on the deal, Credit Suisse Australia chief John Knox, a key adviser to the NRL, met multiple bidders, *telling them the code would return* with an official tender document. The document was never sent, raising question about whether the NRL suffic*iently tested market demand to get the best possible price for its rights, and the league’s 16 clubs.

The NRL is now facing an *uncertain future after banking on a massive jump in the price of the rights. Broadcast revenue *accounts for the vast majority of the code’s annual revenue — $225.8m or 65 per cent of total revenue, according to last year’s annual report.

High-level sources at News Corp, which operates Fox Sports, warned that Mr Smith had devalued the remaining rights after handing two of the sports program provider’s highest-rating timeslots to Nine. (News Corp is publisher of The Australian.)

While Fox knew the NRL was keen to attain more free-to-air coverage and was prepared to work with the code, it was never told of a plan to sell the four top games in each round.

An NRL spokesman said: “We are back in negotiations and will not be discussing the TV rights deal any further until those negotiations are *concluded.”

Nine declined to comment.

Yesterday, The Australian revealed* that Telstra was seriously considering terminating its 17-season association as naming rights sponsor after the NRL awarded streaming rights to Nine, and also failed to give any warning.

Sources close to the telecommunications giant said Telstra, which has committed to spend $100m with the code under its current five-year deal, was close to tearing up the lucrative title sponsorship contract.

If so, the Telstra Premiership would need to be renamed and the ARL Commission, rugby league’s governing body, would have to start a search for a new naming rights partner.

The size of the rugby league deal was not only the biggest in Australian free-to-air TV history, it also marked a departure from the code selling the free-to-air components and pay-TV components in conjunction.

Fox Sports, Telstra and the Seven Network this week made the largest commitment to any football code in Australia, signing a record $2.508 billion deal with the Australian Football League for its TV and digital rights.

Growing disquiet about the rugby league deal has spread to the clubs, and 12 are *seriously considering not signing their participation agreements, sources say.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...over-secret-deal/story-e6frg6n6-1227493850374
 

T to the T

Juniors
Messages
463
Unbiased, honest, independent: Mascord. Walter. Masters*

Judas traitor c#nts: Kent, Rothfield

Update when you can
 
Last edited:

Glen

Bench
Messages
3,956
Hahaha News are so upset that the NRL has finally become a tough negotiator after the good old days with their mate Gallop at the helm. God forbid a huge business with a strong product should try to maximise its value.

And I'm sure the NRL wouldn't have a lot of trouble finding another naming rights sponsor
 
Messages
3,884
You people are a bunch of dimwits.

Rupert Murdoch's son and heir apparent, Lachlan, is a huge rugby league fan. He will do a lot for the game if he is given a fair shake.

All the hate fill garbage on this thread is the mental puss of the ignorant.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
34,573
I love the "News have stood firm with the code despite its doping and links to crime"line.

The very same allegations which have been made about ALL Australian sport, including the AFL, but the selectively quote it.

What about the rank hypocrisy of saying the NRL didn't go to tender and therefore contravened their internal business practices??

Guess what neither did the AFL??? But that's different no doubt??
 

POPEYE

Coach
Messages
11,397
The NRL is not dealing with Lachlan Murdoch, they're dealing with the bloke who shut down English newspapers when they threatened him. It's ok to whinge about him on a forum but when dopes like Brad Walter come out in print and say Fox needs the NRL to stay alive it makes Dave Smith's job of securing anything substantial doubly difficult

Old man Murdoch knows his time is limited, knows his son can do what he likes when he's gone and he's not about to leave the empire he built with his tail between his legs. Absolutely f**king stupid of anyone to wave a red flag at him . . . he could buy Ch9 with pocket money
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
34,573
The NRL is not dealing with Lachlan Murdoch, they're dealing with the bloke who shut down English newspapers when they threatened him. It's ok to whinge about him on a forum but when dopes like Brad Walter come out in print and say Fox needs the NRL to stay alive it makes Dave Smith's job of securing anything substantial doubly difficult

Old man Murdoch knows his time is limited, knows his son can do what he likes when he's gone and he's not about to leave the empire he built with his tail between his legs. Absolutely f**king stupid of anyone to wave a red flag at him . . . he could buy Ch9 with pocket money

Yes let's cower in fear
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
This is what it boils down to:


While Fox knew the NRL was keen to attain more free-to-air coverage and was prepared to work with the code, it was never told of a plan to sell the four top games in each round.

Foxtel just wouldn't have agreed to 4 games on 4 nights on FTA. If they are "working" with a FTA partner then they can just refuse to be a part of the deal and Foxtel have always paid more in these deals. All the other stuff sounded like a gossip mag, lots of 'sources' which usually means they're just making up quotes.
 

LeagueXIII

First Grade
Messages
5,966
I dont get why Steve Mascord would be comfortable if league gets less money.

How is it acceptable that the top rating sport gets less?

Because even though we get less on a yearly basis we may get more. We only need around 2 billion to top the AFL as our deal is one year less.
 
Top