BuffaloRules
Coach
- Messages
- 15,594
He seems to think they are going to get 2 Billion a YEAR...
Now that would get the Victorians worked up...
Now that would get the Victorians worked up...
Spent a bit of time with Graeme Samuel in Perth last week. He is a great operator and real asset on the commission. His networks and business knowledge are incredible.
Haven't you heard? NZ are crying out for a Ozzie flog ball team and the AFL are taking over NZ with their bs participation figures.
...this is got years to run....but I do think Ch9 has lost any idea on innovation and promotion if the game outside of NSW or QLD....the unfair scheduling and biased to certain teams on Friday night...
Everything from Gus and Rabs...ranting and waffling on about private stuff to idiots like Lockyer, Johns, Finch and Fittller being allowed to speak on TV....
Don't even start about the Footy Show.....
An oldie but a goodie;So are North Queensland. ...
:roll:
AFL nears rugby league's popularity in Queensland
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...-popularity-in-queensland-20130530-2nej9.html
Is there anything else you can tell us Perth Red that would be interesting mate?
Rugby eyes apps sale as it redraws TV rights deal
The Australian
April 26, 2015 6:35PM
Darren Davidson
Business Media Writer
Rugby league is tearing up the game plan for media rights, paving the way for the option of splitting the free-to-air television deal between two networks and selling matches direct to fans via apps.
Australian Rugby League Commission chief executive David Smith is targeting a new record billion-dollar TV rights deal as he builds a war chest to take on the AFL. “All possibilities are on the table,” one source said. “We want to go into negotiations with a lot of flexibility.”
Mr Smith phoned executives at rights holders the Nine Network, Fox Sports and Telstra on Friday morning to give formal notification he was starting talks early, as exclusively revealed online by The Australian.
The former banker, who is credited with improving the code’s top-line performance, has pulled forward negotiations by one year in a surprise move to blindside the AFL, and maximise the number of bidders.
He also contacted executives at the Seven and Ten networks last week to ensure competitive tension in the bidding process so the code can reap significantly more than the five-year $1.125 billion deal signed in 2013.
While Nine is determined to retain exclusive free-to-air TV rights, the network is said to be open to the possibility of sharing some matches with Ten or Seven.
Amid limited revenue growth in a challenging advertising market and cost inflation, Nine is keen to avoid a repeat of the tense and sometimes complicated talks it held with Cricket Australia in 2013.
Although Nine had last rights to the new cricket deal, in which it only had to match the highest bid, Ten stunned everyone, especially Nine, with a whopping bid. Ten lodged a $550 million offer for all cricket, which was about twice as much as CA had previously received.
Nine was forced to match the offer, and Ten walked away with cricket’s Big Bash League.
For Seven, the network’s immediate priority is to hold on to its exclusive AFL rights. But Seven insiders confirmed they were interested in participating in the NRL’s rights auction.
Bidding for rights as they come up for renewal has become an even fiercer game, which will make for an intriguing spectacle in the coming months, particularly if AFL chief executive Gillon McLachlan kicks off formal talks for his rights following informal chats with media companies in recent months.
If Telstra decides it wants to hold on to the NRL’s digital rights, it will face intense competition from the free-to-air networks, which view the digital component as far more valuable than previous rounds.
The telco has a sponsorship and digital rights agreement with the NRL worth more than $100m, extending the six-year, $90m deal it signed in 2007.
But the exclusive online and mobile rights are now seen as undervalued by many analysts.
While sports bodies like the NRL have been hedging their bets to maintain profitable free-to-air and subscription TV partnerships, they have never sold matches directly to fans.
However, the potential move risks upsetting Foxtel, which will not pay a premium for rights without exclusive access. The value of sports rights lies in the allocation of access and the level of exclusivity broadcasters get.
In the US, media analysts have estimated that Disney-owned ESPN would become vastly more expensive for sports fans under a mooted direct-to-consumer model. After running the numbers, analysts said the app would cost about $30 a month if it were unbundled from the pay-TV package and sold separately. This is five times the $6 a month that ESPN now costs as part of the subscription bundles sold by cable operators.
Mr Smith has moved early after The Australian revealed Mr McLachlan postponed his own talks due to ongoing uncertainty surrounding the sale of potential bidder the Ten Network. The AFL Commission decided to wait for Ten’s future to be clarified to maximise competition tension and get the best deal.
Rugby league sparks $3b in TV rights scrum
A $3 billion bidding frenzy between three free-to-air television networks and pay-TV provider Foxtel for sports rights has been sparked by rugby's league's decision to enter the market a year ahead of schedule in an effort to steal a march on rival code AFL.
Cashed-up incumbent free-to-air broadcaster Nine Entertainment Co is prepared to pay a record amount for sports rights to keep its rugby league rights, but will face strong competition from Seven West Media and Network Ten.
Nine's rivals are particularly interested in the three-match State of Origin series,usually among the highest rating of any TV show each year. NRL chief executive Dave Smith had indicated he wants the networks to bid for Origin as a separate asset, believing a move could unlock significant value for the sport and potentially valuing the series at between $50 million to $100 million alone.
The NRL's move is expected also spark intense negotiations across the networks and Foxtel and Fox Sports Australia as all parties seek to cut joint venture deals to potentially spread the financial burden the new contracts will cause. "It is unlikely any free-to-air network can exclusively own both the AFL and NRL," one source said.
Ten, which has struggled in the ratings and needs a significant boost to its balance sheet, is prepared to cut deals with other networks in an attempt to gain a foothold in either sport. Its involvement in any talks will bring the competitive tension both the NRL and AFL are seeking.
Huge lob
Seven, meanwhile, could lob a huge bid for State of Origin and force Nine to dig deep to keep all rugby league free-to-air rights. Meanwhile, Foxtel and Fox Sports are likely to push for a NRL deal similar to that it already has with AFL, where it broadcasts every match live, some of which are simulcast on free-to-air. Fox Sports currently shows only five of eight NRL games live.
Foxtel and Ten could big together, particularly if a long-mooted deal for the pay-TV operator to take a 14.9 per cent stake in Ten comes to fruition.
Mr Smith told network bosses on Friday the sport was keen to commence negotiations on a deal to follow its current $1.2 billion broadcast rights contract with Nine, Fox Sports Australia and Telstra that expires in 2017.
It means rugby league is in the market a full year ahead of usual, as sports usually try to sign contracts about a year of the end of current deals, and at the same time as the AFL. The NRL is also free for the first time to negotiate without a "first or last rights" clause that previously compelled it to offer matching rights to the incumbent broadcaster.
Money sucked out
It is understood the NRL moved early as it was concerned much of the money in the TV market would have been sucked out by the by AFL, which started talks on its rights deal in late 2014 under new chief executive Gillon McLachlan.
The AFL has told the TV networks it values its rights at about $1.75 billion over five years, up from the $1.25 billion deal it currently has with Seven, Foxtel and Telstra. The NRL is also expecting a big uplift of its rights, which means the two sports could end up with combined contracts worth more than $3 billion over five years.
While the NRL has not put a timeframe on finalising its negotiations, the TV networks expect the league to push for talks to be finalised by the end of 2015 – the same time the AFL is also aiming to have a new deal in place by. "We think they will both happen this year," one network source said.
The networks are also expected to push hard to gain digital rights to both sports, now held by Telstra. Seven has had success with tennis, broadcasting matches of this year's Australian Open live via mobiles and tables to bigger than expected audiences. "We will be bidding across all platforms," a network executive said.
The money expected to flow to the AFL and NRL could be a blow to other sports also seeking new rights deals. Football Federation Australia has recently held talks with all three free-to-air networks in an attempt to entice one to take on a contract already held by SBS. The move may be put on hold until NRL and AFL rights are finalised.
As a TV bean counter advising the execs, I would much rather be dealing with a Welsh banker than any of the previous NRL administrators. I have full confidence in Smith to pull off a good or even very good deal. Just his independence, from Ch 9, Newscorp and rugby league dinosaurs is a huge plus for those on the other side of the negotiation table. Ch 7 will Ch 10 be much more inclined to have a serious dig knowing this.
No F&L issues, no ownership issues and going to auction at the same time as the main competitor.
Can't wait to watch these negotiations progress.
Got an interesting hypothetical to fans here, which would you take?
1) The NRL gets $2 Billion over 5 years, CH7, CH9, CH10 and Foxtel split the rights and the conditions start for the 2018 season: true live national coverage (secondary channels in non-heartland states), 2 new teams (2018), a Saturday night game on FTA, Foxtel simulcasting and NRL controls the draw.
2) The NRL getting $1.5 Billion over 5 years from 2018, CH9 & Foxtel keep the rights but from next year the new conditions kick in with true live national coverage (secondary channels in non-heartland states), 2 new teams (2018), a Saturday night game on FTA, Foxtel simulcasting and NRL controls the draw.
Got an interesting hypothetical to fans here, which would you take?
1) The NRL gets $2 Billion over 5 years, CH7, CH9, CH10 and Foxtel split the rights and the conditions start for the 2018 season: true live national coverage (secondary channels in non-heartland states), 2 new teams (2018), a Saturday night game on FTA, Foxtel simulcasting and NRL controls the draw.
2) The NRL getting $1.5 Billion over 5 years from 2018, CH9 & Foxtel keep the rights but from next year the new conditions kick in with true live national coverage (secondary channels in non-heartland states), 2 new teams (2018), a Saturday night game on FTA, Foxtel simulcasting and NRL controls the draw.