The Lounge Lizard
Bench
- Messages
- 3,832
My mirror begs to differ.....He’s gorgeous that’s for sure.
My mirror begs to differ.....He’s gorgeous that’s for sure.
We haven’t changed too much in attack from previous years. Morris was pretty good in setting up our attack, it was defence he completely ignored so Fitz hasn’t done too much with that I feel.Quite surprised at how much shape the Sharks have in attack so far - given that Fitzgibbon has come from the Roosters and they largely play fast through the middle.
I've never really bough into that, feel like it's mostly a myth. I think it's down to the actually player themselves.I thought he was overhyped - plenty of players come out of the Melbourne system and look very ordinary.
But so far he’s living up to the hype. Obviously he needs to maintain similar form across more than 3 games, but all signs are looking pretty positive.
They look like 2018-19 Roosters when they do their sweeping backline raids. Can only be the big F.We haven’t changed too much in attack from previous years. Morris was pretty good in setting up our attack, it was defence he completely ignored so Fitz hasn’t done too much with that I feel.
Also think the off season was mostly about getting defence up to scratch with only so much time to work on stuff.
And besides Fitz didn’t touch the Roosters attack so might be too much he brings over?
The change in attack that I can see (so far) is that for each movement there is usually multiple options that allow the players to read the defence to make a decision on what option to take. For example:We haven’t changed too much in attack from previous years. Morris was pretty good in setting up our attack, it was defence he completely ignored so Fitz hasn’t done too much with that I feel.
Also think the off season was mostly about getting defence up to scratch with only so much time to work on stuff.
And besides Fitz didn’t touch the Roosters attack so might be too much he brings over?
Helps that we have a few gifted eyes up footballers to execute the plays ad-lib. Kennedy and Hynes are getting better by the week and are still learning on the job. Don't think either of them has hit 50 games yet?The change in attack that I can see (so far) is that for each movement there is usually multiple options that allow the players to read the defence to make a decision on what option to take. For example:
- In the Parra game, the Sharks were finding success with a ball player sweeping behind - usually Kennedy on the right and Hynes on the left. Parra started to defend this really strongly and shutting down Hynes and Kennedy respectively. Moylan was able to read this on the last play with Parramatta going hard toward Hynes, which allowed him to send it short to Wilton for the game tying try.
- In the Dragons game, the best example of this was the Hamlin-Uele try. Sharks were setup for a movement to the left. Brailey see the defence rush up, so he puts a small grubber into the in goal that BHU pounces on. The under-appreciated part of this try is that BHU and Tolman (i think?) were already pushing up as they would have been used as decoy runners on the movement to the left.
It really appears that Fitzy has built in a system that is flexible to allow players to make use of their talents and ability to read the game. It is dependent on all players in a movement to expect the ball at any time though. This could backfire when concentration lapses.
Is he better? I don't agreeWhile Papenhuyzen is a better fullback, I thought it completely f**ked Storm's momentum last year taking him out of the role when he was on fire. Glad he's going well at the Sharks.
...or a least get to play Origin with him.Will be the worlds best player within 12 months
Papenhuyzen was very good prior to his long concussion stint out of the game. I think he's a better fullback but Hynes is a better player overall.Is he better? I don't agree
More like Dufty with a f**ked up mulletTake Paps out of the Storm system and you get Matt Dufty
like the fox for example?I thought he was overhyped - plenty of players come out of the Melbourne system and look very ordinary.
Probably because he wouldn’t put hair gel in his lush locksTrent Barrett deemed him surplus to requirements at Manly lol.
Was chad on 800 at sharks or now at cows ? Either way good griefWell, 2 wrongs don't make a right. But yes, 600k looks like a great deal on Hynes at this stage.