No team has ever won the premiership after conceding 50pts in a regular season match

[Someone]

Of the teams that have scored 50, who looks like winning the premiership this year?

South & Roosters yeah.

Warriors no. who else has scored 50?

 

[Mr Saab]

'Hook' had a decent start to his coaching career but hes on the slide.

He is doing a Henak
Both made the prelim final in their first yr
Both had crap 2nd yrs (Griffin made the finals, but shouldnt have)
Henjak didnt see a third yr....Griffin wont see a 4th yr

 

[no name]

He is doing a Henak
Both made the prelim final in their first yr
Both had crap 2nd yrs (Griffin made the finals, but shouldnt have)
Henjak didnt see a third yr....Griffin wont see a 4th yr

Henjak inherited his team from Bennett, just as he got the team he wanted he got the arse. Griffin benefited off that side. The management and Griffin have dropped the ball since.

 

[benntash]

Of the teams that have scored 50, who looks like winning the premiership this year?

South & Roosters yeah.

Warriors no. who else has scored 50?

Penrith

 

[SpaceMonkey]

Given that theWarriors have both scored and conceded half centuries in the last few weeks, do those performances cancel each other out? :lol:

 

[Sans Souci Sainter]

Add us to the list. We'll be lucky not to finish in the bottom four.

It's a bitter pill to swallow so early in the year isn't it?

The Ashes will be another kick in the nuts.

I genuinely think NSW will win though. It's just science.

 

[Amadaca]

It's a bitter pill to swallow so early in the year isn't it?

The Ashes will be another kick in the nuts.

I genuinely think NSW will win though. It's just science.

So are lobotomies. I think you may have had one.

 

[Sans Souci Sainter]

So are lobotomies. I think you may have had one.

Yeah, well, that's like, your opinion man...

 

[Amadaca]

I do love me some Big Lebowski :lol:

 

[Amadaca]

The Roosters went very, very close on two occasions (2002, 2010).

 

[undertaker]

The Roosters went very, very close on two occasions (2002, 2010).

Key word in that sentence: close.

Close means nothing when it comes to winning the premiership. Either you won it or you didn't.

In this case, the Roosters didn't.

 

[Amadaca]

Key word in that sentence: close.

Close means nothing when it comes to winning the premiership. Either you won it or you didn't.

In this case, the Roosters didn't.

O.....kay....:sarcasm:

 

[undertaker]

Parra conceded 50 for the 2nd time this year

 

[juro]

Well they're definitely not going to win it then!

 

[Valheru]

Will canberra reverse the trend?

 

[Tonearm Terrorwrist]

Key word in that sentence: close.

Close means nothing when it comes to winning the premiership. Either you won it or you didn't.

In this case, the Roosters didn't.

For a start you know the Roosters won the comp in 2002, right?

 

[Raider_69]

Spoiler alert... unless your mascot is a Rabbit, Rooster, Eagle or Storm cloud, you aren't winning the comp in 2013

The top 4 is elite, the rest of us are just playing for the best seat in the house

 

[DC_fan]

Spoiler alert... unless your mascot is a Rabbit, Rooster, Eagle or Storm cloud, you aren't winning the comp in 2013

The top 4 is elite, the rest of us are just playing for the best seat in the house

R69 I have to agree.

I know the Storm looked good today against the Raiders. But any team would have beaten Canberra today.

Yes the top four teams are clearly better then the rest. Melbourne for the past month have looked ordinary.

I still believe the premiership battle is a two horse race between the Roosters and Souths.

 

[Dogs Of War]

The Roosters went very, very close on two occasions (2002, 2010).

They didn't concede 50 in 2002. 48 was the worst against Melbourne.

 

[Raider_69]

Writing the storm off is a fools game
They've have beaten every side they played today, Slater, Cronk and Smith put on an absolute clinic, and no side will beat them if those 3 play like that in a game.