What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non-eels footy stuff

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,971
I think it's fair. In 2021, making fun of foreign language elements is obviously a dig at the clueless merkins who can't pronounce it or still think it's funny. It is meta-humour, coming from a place of irony.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,434
I think it's fair. In 2021, making fun of foreign language elements is obviously a dig at the clueless merkins who can't pronounce it or still think it's funny. It is meta-humour, coming from a place of irony.
Not quite right. In this case it is not a person who was offended by the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka jibe, it's the utterer of the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka who says she is defamed by the publication that suggested that she was being racist.

The courts will look at it and apply a well worn test "if it is likely to cause ordinary reasonable persons to think less of the plaintiff or shun, ridicule or avoid her". Another test applied by the courts is whether the words have "the tendency to lower the person in the estimation of reasonable members of the community".

So do you think that the court will find in her favour, that the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka joke would not have been taken by a reasonable person as racist and hence she was defamed ?
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
53,268
I don’t think the case has legs. But it’s probably served it’s purpose and allowed her to shift the focus onto online bullying. She’s already got a lot of media out of it.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,971
Not quite right. In this case it is not a person who was offended by the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka jibe, it's the utterer of the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka who says she is defamed by the publication that suggested that she was being racist.

The courts will look at it and apply a well worn test "if it is likely to cause ordinary reasonable persons to think less of the plaintiff or shun, ridicule or avoid her". Another test applied by the courts is whether the words have "the tendency to lower the person in the estimation of reasonable members of the community".

So do you think that the court will find in her favour, that the hooka looka mooka hooka fooka joke would not have been taken by a reasonable person as racist and hence she was defamed ?
I don't really care about the court case. I just don't think it is evidence of her being racist. Unfortunately the 'reasonable person' test would be better described as the lowest common denominator test. 'Reasonable persons' are incapable of nuance.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,434
I don't really care about the court case. I just don't think it is evidence of her being racist. Unfortunately the 'reasonable person' test would be better described as the lowest common denominator test. 'Reasonable persons' are incapable of nuance.
Unsure if your "peers" would take kindly to that observation, old chap.

1630305964555.png
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,287
She f**ked up but has a barrister who may just save her arse.

If anyone else said that they would have been hung out to dry.
 

Latest posts

Top