Non-eels footy stuff

[I'm a loser baby...]

I sorta just made the same comment in the NRL forum, bringing in a rule then applying it retrospectively is, well like Bazal said, a can of worms inside a can of worms

Why would anyone put worms in a can? What would they breathe?

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Issac appears a bit thick.

AND OUR IDIOT COACH WANTED TO SIGN HIM!! FFFS!!

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Maybe Issac put the worms in a can.

 

[Gronk]

 

[Gary Gutful]

That's true. But how is it relevant to someone distributing a sex tape?

 

[Gronk]

That's true. But how is it relevant to someone distributing a sex tape?

He tried but failed to victim blame.

Ladies who are attracted to bad boys do not give permission to be raped or filmed.

Happy International Womans Day.

 

[Gronk]

 

[Happy MEel]

That was about as coherent and well-prepared as Big Mal’s first and only political press conference.

 

[84 Baby]

Ladies who are attracted to bad boys do not give permission to be raped

Most probably not

or filmed

Big claim

 

[Gronk]

Over to you Todd.

Sharks
2013 Not compliant
2014 Not compliant
2015 Not compliant
2016 Compliant (wins comp)
2017 Not compliant

 

[Gronk]

Here's a twist for STG.

If de Belin succeeds to have the right to play whilst awaiting his trial, does the club lose St George Bank as their major sponsor because of the brand damage ?

 

[hineyrulz]

If I needed anymore reason to totally dislike the Maggot that is Cameron Smith.

 

[84 Baby]

Over to you Todd.

Sharks
2013 Not compliant
2014 Not compliant
2015 Not compliant
2016 Compliant (wins comp)
2017 Not compliant

It's convenient but FMD Smith is a moron

 

[Kornstar]

Over to you Todd.

Sharks
2013 Not compliant
2014 Not compliant
2015 Not compliant
2016 Compliant (wins comp)
2017 Not compliant

I can't be f**ked looking into the details of the Cronulla stuff but were they systematically cheating? Or is it a similar scenario where clubs are often over the cap for the year and the NRL fines them?

Weren't the Knights over like 440k in 2001?

The precedence for being stripped was the systematic cheating wasn't it?

 

[Gronk]

I can't be f**ked looking into the details of the Cronulla stuff but were they systematically cheating? Or is it a similar scenario where clubs are often over the cap for the year and the NRL fines them?

Weren't the Knights over like 440k in 2001?

The precedence for being stripped was the systematic cheating wasn't it?

Sharks set up a fake company for fake TPA sponsorships. It was bad.

 

[BoneyBlake17]

I can't be f**ked looking into the details of the Cronulla stuff but were they systematically cheating? Or is it a similar scenario where clubs are often over the cap for the year and the NRL fines them?

Weren't the Knights over like 440k in 2001?

The precedence for being stripped was the systematic cheating wasn't it?

I am pretty sure Paul Kent said the other night other teams have done less and got heavier penalties

Parramatta may have been his case in point.

Anyway my conspiracy theory is i reckon if it wasn't the sharks 1 and only premiership in 53 years they would have stripped it off them.

 

[Bazal]

Sharks set up a fake company for fake TPA sponsorships. It was bad.

But not until 2017, according to the stuff I've read.

 

[Gronk]

 

[Bazal]

Well that's not going to get messy at all...

 

[strider]

Well that's not going to get messy at all...

I kinda applaud them for trying to stop something that is obviously being rorted by teams .... but yeah, its destined for dodginess