Non Footy Chat Thread II

[hindy111]

I went to a special school where we were all inflawed.

So how did the handicap parking thing work?

 

[Gary Gutful]

Well your comment was in response to my assertion that the words of a fundamentalist aren't dangerous. If dangerous people are looking for justification it's wrong to blame the one doing the justifying.

I'm not blaming anyone. I'm just suggesting that it is possible for someone to be genuinely influenced by the words of others. Surely we can agree on that?

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

I'm not blaming anyone. I'm just suggesting that it is possible for someone to be genuinely influenced by the words of others. Surely we can agree on that?

Just a minute ago I thought that was bullshit but then I read your post and I couldn't agree more.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I'm not blaming anyone. I'm just suggesting that it is possible for someone to be genuinely influenced by the words of others. Surely we can agree on that?

Sure but does that make the influence dangerous?

 

[Gary Gutful]

Just a minute ago I thought that was bullshit but then I read your post and I couldn't agree more.

Do you still agree now?

 

[Gary Gutful]

Sure but does that make the influence dangerous?

Less dangerous than the action but it still contains a degree of danger. Not sure how anyone could legitimately suggest that it doesn't. That was your original inference.

That said, I am completely opposed to any attempts to use my argument as a vehicle to control free speech. Thats f**ken bullshit.

 

[Gronk]

Religions have stood the test of time. Just because wealthy people like yourself have no need for it doesn't mean it's not still the opiate of the masses. It's either that or opium.

Thank you for this irrelevant opinion.

 

[Gronk]

I'd love to meet an unflawed individual. Maybe I didn't go to the right school.

For Izzy, you’d refer him to a mental health assessment scale, scroll down to towards delusional psychosis.

 

[Gronk]

I have compassion for you.

Likewise.

 

[Twizzle]

I wonder which criticism is correct.

criticism is just some one exercising an opinion, doesn't make it right or wrong

 

[84 Baby]

Sure but does that make the influence dangerous?

Surely it would potentially increase the sample size

 

[hindy111]

I'm not blaming anyone. I'm just suggesting that it is possible for someone to be genuinely influenced by the words of others. Surely we can agree on that?

Rockstars - They shape generations or I should say used too

 

[hindy111]

For Izzy, you’d refer him to a mental health assessment scale, scroll down to towards delusional psychosis.

Here we go....
Like I said earlier, there are no facts just interpretations.
You support the big bang and monkeys turning into humans idea

 

[hindy111]

Likewise.

You merkin

 

[Bazal]

Here we go....
Like I said earlier, there are no facts just interpretations.
You support the big bang and monkeys turning into humans idea

Thing is you can track the big bang. Even today. No one with half a brain disputes that the big bang happened.

The question is why? Or maybe better, how?

 

[Gary Gutful]

criticism is just some one exercising an opinion, doesn't make it right or wrong

There is fair and unfair criticism though.

 

[hindy111]

Thing is you can track the big bang. Even today. No one with half a brain disputes that the big bang happened.

The question is why? Or maybe better, how?

And what was there before that and what created that?
Nobody knows.

My mate Jack Diplock reckons we are part of a kids school science project and he created the big bang by adding some chemicals on purpose

 

[Bazal]

And what was there before that and what created that?
Nobody knows.

My mate Jack Diplock reckons we are part of a kids school science project and he created the big bang by adding some chemicals on purpose

Well if you want to get really crazy, there's apparently plenty of evidence that we're just part of a simulation

 

[Gronk]

Here we go....
Like I said earlier, there are no facts just interpretations.
You support the big bang and monkeys turning into humans idea

There are facts when it comes to science. There are no facts when it comes to religion.

 

[84 Baby]

Here we go....
Like I said earlier, there are no facts just interpretations.
You support the big bang and monkeys turning into humans idea

If I can routinely test something to determine how it works/it’s existence, would you not call that a fact?
True there may be something at an even finer level but it doesn’t negate the factual evidence above it.
The difference between your “facts and interpretations” is faith. Religion is faith in the existence of something irregardless of everything else. Pure faith would be even willing to question your own existence before questioning the existence of whatever higher power. Science doesn’t place faith in anything, rather stating you can and should test existence, not just take it as gospel