What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non Footy Chat Thread II

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,100
Raised catholic but now a spiritual man. I find some of the lack of respect towards someones faith on this forum poor.
In a way hypocritical what some things people chose to respect and not to.
It didn’t happen BTW. Do you think that my post was disrespectful or did it just prompt you to make a random thought post ?

1695503350038.jpeg
 
Messages
17,590
Judging by the afl response,the yes campaign needs to secretly promote the likes of that sob Sam Newman.

False Flag operations.

And if I was in charge of the Yes campaign, keep all the crusty tree hugging, out of touch champagne socialist wokeys out of it and spread as much misinformation and lies about the No campaign as is legally possible.

Put a horrible racist no voter on the Tv and other media who has other nasty views so No voters don’t want to be associated with him.

Someone who looks like a pedo corporate banker.

Pay an actor.

Hopefully that Hey Dad supports the No campaign, someone should check and if so, put ads up about it.

I will put my anti-yes campaign thoughts up later. Balance.

The No campaign can draw upon fear of the unknown on the one hand and the hard left who despise it as it’s co-opting the indigenous into a system forced upon them. Interesting and turbulent dynamic.

I dare say there’s never been two more diametrically opposed camps joining hands in Australian history.
 
Last edited:
Messages
17,590
If I was in charge of the No campaign, I’d have this ad on Tv.

A brand new Tesla driving through an indigenous reserve with a speaker on top.

Two old fogey hippies sit side by side and broadcast:

“ Vote for the voice, it will be good for you”

One resident turns the next one and remarks

“What about a doctor in town?”

The other one says;

“ That’s been a promised since 1965”

and they both roll their eyes and laugh.

And the words come up black on a white screen

“Indigenous Australians don’t just need another voice, they need action.”

And of course, many 5 second ads of albo swaying along and clapping out of time to “ blue sky mine” nothing else needs to be said with this clip. The suggestion is another champagne socialist, with million dollar incomes, pretending they care.
 
Last edited:
Messages
17,590
What about this ad for the No campaign;

A bunch of people gather on a corner, walk down the street, trample over flowerbeds and plant the voice flag on someone’s front lawn.
 
Messages
17,590
B54296AD-4E1E-4822-9F6A-CC64DD2EF90D.jpeg
For a kid, this is very complex decision. My kid might starve before making a decision..as soon as he’s finished next doors chimney.

Hose him off before he’s allowed in the yard.
 
Messages
17,590
Back to the voice, this time for Yes

The unelectable Peter Dutton in his white bowls uniform, at the green getting pats on the pack and a few

“ nice one Pete, just like Aunty Bethel in the ‘68 finals”

Just then he is served a glass of Chardonnay by a young indigenous guy and just as the young guy goes to speak to him, Pete purses his lips and says “ shhhhh”
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
45,690
There is more than one person likely to vote no, hence why 'us' was used in the first instance.

.....which would make sense if the original post in that exchange had anything to do with voting or the Voice.

Being welcomed to your own country is offensive. More woke bullshit.

Stinky bait is very stinky.

You’re supposed to call us racists

Us?

Is this your new pronoun?
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
45,690
Perhaps it's one of them Borg hive mind things I've heard tell of.

Would Pou and Sam Newman being part of the same hive mind explain it?
 

Latest posts

Top