- Messages
- 154,098
So we should stop selling a major export and trash our economy just because the export is finite?
umm............no
where did I say we should trash our economy ?
there is plenty of middle ground
So we should stop selling a major export and trash our economy just because the export is finite?
Clearly you've forgotten the Chubb Baseball Bat.As I explained, the power doesn't need to come from coal. I acknowledge we need coal to make steel, I went to high school too.
And why do we need to supply the world ?
Clearly you've forgotten the Chubb Baseball Bat.
Oh I thought you were making an analogy. You know, climate change = terminal illness.
In spite of falling renewable costs, fossil fuel generation is still cheaper in most regards, except for one – the price of operation. The WEC notes that once renewables are built and online, their costs are mainly marginal operational and maintenance expenses. Compare that to fossil fuels, whose costs are volatile and subject to change from factors like commodity price swings and external costs like carbon pricing and pollution.
“You’ll hear people say, ‘no, coal can compete’,” Andy Vesey, the chief executive of AGL Energy told a forum in Melbourne yesterday.
“But I’ve looked at the numbers and come to decisions (that) are going to direct billions of dollars of investment.
“The new base load for us is going to be large-scale renewables, firmed up by open-cycle gas and, eventually, when storage comes down, that’s what it will be.’’
umm............no
where did I say we should trash our economy ?
there is plenty of middle ground
You haven't answered my question! You've just said it could be done. I'm wanting you to explain how! If you do some research you might find that it is a stretch to make such a suggestion. But tell me, how do you think it could work?As I explained, the power doesn't need to come from coal. I acknowledge we need coal to make steel, I went to high school too.
And why do we need to supply the world ?
You haven't answered my question! You've just said it could be done. I'm wanting you to explain how! If you do some research you might find that it is a stretch to make such a suggestion. But tell me, how do you think it could work?
As for 'why Australia' there are obvious economic benefits but the truthful answer is that the Bowen Basin is the cleanest source of met coal in the world. They actually rate all met coal against the coal from one of the mines in the Bowen Basin. If there is worldwide demand (which there will continue to be because there are no large scale viable alternatives) then going elsewhere will result in more carbon emissions and therefore a greater contribution to global climate change.
Yep. It's thermal coal from the yet to be opened Galiliee Basin. Adani want to use it in Power Stations in India.Is it true that the Adani coal (Galilee Basin) is low joule low grade (high ash) coal only slightly better than the crap that Indonesia are peddling ?
You're a misnomer.So Nat King Coal was actually a misnomer?
So Nat King Coal was actually a misnomer?
I wanna know how a marine biologist knows so much about coal?
FFS i think someone is monnlighting a second job!
what have you got to say for yourself mr @Gary Gutful ?
A mermaid taught me about it.I wanna know how a marine biologist knows so much about coal?
FFS i think someone is monnlighting a second job!
what have you got to say for yourself mr @Gary Gutful ?