- Messages
- 153,968
Actually, I just spent almost $400 on a Darth Vader outfit.
Absolutely. The prequels are total f**king trash. As far as I am concerned they do not exist.
I cant imagine Darth with a beard
Actually, I just spent almost $400 on a Darth Vader outfit.
Absolutely. The prequels are total f**king trash. As far as I am concerned they do not exist.
Sure does Gary Gutful ....beautiful white teeth, 5'6 size 10 with 14c chesticles
Sure does Gary Gutful ....beautiful white teeth, 5'6 size 10 with 14c chesticles
Do you call them "chesticles" when she's around?
The PC term is 'shirt potatoes'.
I cant imagine Darth with a beard
Well, just imagine Darth Vader...but better looking.
Well, just imagine Darth Vader...but better looking.
Eric Abetz reckons that Australians don't want same sex marriage. After all he says, polls are not a true sample of our society. More pple go to church on the weekend than go to the football.
Compelling argument there Eric.
He ain't Richard Gere buddy.
My honest opinion is that if we sent it to a national vote (what is the official name of it is) that a lot of people would be shocked at the results and it would be MUCH closer than most people think.
People who are anti gay marriage tend to keep their mouths shut due to fear of getting shouted down by the VERY vocal people who support it. In a vote where it's private they can voice their real opinion.
Just because the people you associate your self with aren't against it doesn't mean there aren't plenty of hill billy bogans out there that despise homosexuals.
My experience is that it is about 50/50 with the people I know. I personally don't care what anyone does so why would I vote against it but I have been shocked by several people who I know that aggressively (not out in public of course) do not support it.
It has to go to a vote but I'm really not sure that marriage equality advocates will be too happy with the result.
I think it's pretty simple. If you don't like gay marriage, don't marry a gay person.
The conservatives pushed for a public vote because they know that we tend to vote against every plebiscite or referendum. Tony hung his hat on the electorate's historical trend to err on the side of caution. So far we have only ticked off 8 of 44.
Also a plebiscite seeks only to establish a position and does not necessarily bind politicians to vote in that manner.
Facts are that our politicians have been quite capable on voting on issues of conscience in the past. So they can vote on matters like such as euthanasia, human cloning and the abortion drug RU486, but not that same sex couples can get married ? Sound odd to you ?
:lol: that's pretty much my stance.
So they are against it but are still handing it over to the public? Isn't that giving it more chance than if they voted and it gets shot down?