El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
again your beloved Swannies failed to get that mythical 120k on FTA even when it was against another Sydney teamswans get 120k fta in syd
again your beloved Swannies failed to get that mythical 120k on FTA even when it was against another Sydney teamswans get 120k fta in syd
Ch 7 is popular in Perth because it shows AFL it also had the field in Commercial TV to its self for many yrs till 9 opened,runs Telethon & a number of other things spend half its time promoting Eagles/Dockers players from both teams are on ABC radio commercial FM AM stations you cannot escape it.
Brainwashing raised to an art form.apart from Football 7 to me is a dreadful channel but so are 9 10 & on Radio its AFL is propagandized to death 24/7 helps that Stokes who owns 7 also owns the 6 days a week Worst Australian & the 1 day Sundry Slimes,the thoughts of chairman Stokes are always with us in Perth
The TV ratings figures for Sunday football AFL is a CON. Different games different channells, multi channels.
http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2017/07/sunday-16-july-2017.html
In SYD Melb it's one game in Melbourne, for Perth (different time zone) it's anther game. But they combine two different games and so out-rate NRL. AFL Fake Figures.
Go Beau show those AFL Fu##e#s.
Makes you wonder how they got so much money for their tv deal when they don't even have stand alone product. Either they are very good negotiators or we are very bad. With combined content the amount of FTA game time that actually gets shown is significantly reduced.
they were pommy born Perth residentsThe negotiators for the AFL: were Perth born with Pommy parents.Brilliant at finalising deals with a smile on their faces.
Another reason our deal was so sht in comparison. Take value of Origin out and the FTA component of the NRL coverage looks pathetic when you take this showing of dfferent games at same time on different channels into account. Either Seven paid massive overs or Nine paid massive unders.
But if afl are playing games at the same time on sevens different channels then. They aren't getting 4 fta stand alone games, they aren't getting 4 longer games and they aren't getting 4 games of full value adds. take the highly valuable origin out of the nine fta deal and suddenLy you have seven paying a motza for 2- 2.5 equivalent games compared to nines 3 games, especially as nine saved even more by selling the fourth game and simucast to fox. The deal,looks sht which ever way up you look at it.
Basically for 3fta games awek of nrl nine ended up paying a yearly fee of $185mill minus $40mill it got from fox for Saturday game and simucast minus value of SOO (which some have valued at $100mill) pretty good deal!
Seven paid for 3.5fta games $150mill with some of the games overlapping on different channels.
Whatever 7 paid with Fox,they still paid on the basis of 18 teams spread across 5 states, we got not that much different with 16 teams over 3 states .On a per minute playing time ,the NRL shats over the AFL.
Whatever 9 paid and Fox ditto's not that far off the mark for the NRL.
When you consider from Gallop/News first negotiating involvement being left at the gate, $500m over 6 tears to $780 over 5 years for AWFUl,the code has been having to work from behind from tax day onwards.
All TV execs have to say in their argument ,but it's a 30% increase on 500m, yet we have a fair idea it could have been a 30% increase on 700m.Trading up if you will.
The so called sh*t money ,started way back in the $500m over 6 years debacle, and we have been punished for it ever since, because of the lower starting price base.
Your ignoring value of soo and for seven that they simucast games against each other cannobolising the audience and advert value.
On the face of it $850mill for 5 years from nine looked a great deal but turns out not so great after all.
No I'm not. And I've spelt out the starting point where we lost the plot.
Do we really know the actual value of the latest SOO deal? If you believe media then good luck.
In fact Fox playing live all games ,and all games against 9 is cannibalising Nein's audience.The reason their audience in the main has taken a hit, plus the dopy commentators they have on the job.
I have stated many times if Smith had not gone gung ho early alone ,almost assuredly and judging by Rupe's comments,we'd have been better off.
Human nature works on the basis usually, you try and get me via the back door, you end up paying the price.Revenge is sweet.and we got "revenged".
You have openly admitted time after time, the money the NRL is getting is more than enough for expansion,grassroots and players.yet you bang on it's sh*t.
Seriously, you and Trump change with the breeze.Flip ,flop.
You are also completely ignoring AWFUL has more ad spots ,because of their dragged out game.
Just to clarify, Its sht in comparison to our main competitor. And yes I believe there is no excuse for the NRL not to be thriving on a revenue increase in 7 years from $180mill to over $500mill!
And you keep ignoring the value of origin and the fact their 3.5 games are overlapping at the same time whilst our 3 are stand alone and the fact more people watch NRL. Yes they have more ad breaks, more capital city exposure and that's about it in their favour. Stop making excuses for the sht performance of the commission and the NRL management.
$500mill plus revenue in 2018. Massive revenue increase in short space of time. Still no money to do anything and having to get a loan. It's a joke!
$850 for 5 years sounded great until you consider what nine really paid after the onselling to fox and the value of origin then put it next to what seven paid for 4 simucast fta games, suddenly the $850 looks unders yet again.
ignore is your friend! I've found the site much more enjoyable after hitting ignore on el dribbler. You might like to do same with me as you seem to be getting somewhat obsessed and it can't be healthy for you lol.