- Messages
- 35,850
Yeah 43 is bad. 20 missed tackles per half is pretty much the barometer for shitty defence. Under 10 per half is a pass mark.
Imagine if the field was regulation size
Yeah 43 is bad. 20 missed tackles per half is pretty much the barometer for shitty defence. Under 10 per half is a pass mark.
But I thought the narrow field would favour Canberra? We aren't a big side and needed wider flanks.Imagine if the field was regulation size.
But I thought the narrow field would favour Canberra? We aren't a big side and needed wider flanks.
Yep, I would suggest they adapted their game to the width much better than we did. Thats going to matter more than any supposed advantage based on the roster.Seems like it did. The field and also being a better coached, better football team.
So it's ok to attack the kickers legs now? Just a penalty, not 10mins. Or is it just a Warriors jersey thing?the guy that should have been binned scores the intercept. f**king bullshit.
I watched both games, the difference between us and the other 3 teams was ridiculous. Fogarty/Strange, Trindall and Cleary were all incredibly sharp. The shape of the Sharks and Panthers was so impressive, these are well coached teams that know exactly what they're doing at every point on the parkI only watched the mini of Panthers v Sharks, but manly how much more impressive those teams were. Structure in attack, crisp passing.
I think they should are the top 4 teams from year befote once everyone had a go.
Second game was excellent. Trindall was superb and IMO, overshadowed his million dollar half partner yet again. And seeing AFB scoring from close gave me PTSD.I only watched the mini of Panthers v Sharks, but manly how much more impressive those teams were. Structure in attack, crisp passing.
I think they should are the top 4 teams from year befote once everyone had a go.