What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL may Veteo Bulldogs sponsorship

Loudstrat

Coach
Messages
15,224
Timmah, you are losing the plot, mate.

Here's the plot.

A 95% capacity crowd is GOOD.

Negotiating a major sponsor that is not allowed is BAD.

Give yourself a few minutes to get back in the game, you'll be right. :lol:
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Where did I say a 95% capacity crowd wasn't good? :? I think you're confusing me with someone else ;-)
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Don't stoop to personal attacks and answer the question...

You don't have an answer do you?

Personal attacks? You begun launching attacks on my club first up mate. You'll get no answers from me after those little nuggets.
 

Loudstrat

Coach
Messages
15,224
Calm down Dodgey! It's a bad few weeks for the Dogs. Sympathy and all that. You don't need to join the 'must kill Sydney clubs' brigade to find some support.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
Yawn...you have nothing.

I'm not directly taking shots at the club - heck I have a soft spot for them. I'm just trying to get some sort of understanding on how a club can get to the stage where they announce a major sponsorship - by a company who is directly (retail) in competition with the game's major sponsor and knowing that any sponsorship by a competitor is against the rules - without doing something as basic as advising the NRL that they have found a major sponsor. It is merely an observation that they purposely did it thinking they could shame the NRL and Telstra in to allowing it.

Highlighting that you have no idea about what you are arguing about and making you look silly is just for my pleasure :)
 
Messages
17,566
I get soft about the dogs also.

Timmah, Timmah, Timmah......You really are Mr argumentative are'nt you.

Funny thing is if it was any other side you would be the first to say...rules are rules!

But alas it's the Dogs, so now you defend them like it's all you have in your life.

Hang on, maybe it is! Sorry Timmah, it just dawned on me that you have no life, just the dogs. f**k sad mate
 

Kelly Patrol

Juniors
Messages
263
Greenberg until now has conducted himself with class and dignity cleaning that rabble up.I actually wondered what he was doing at the Dogs.Now I can see he is a dog at heart.Rules are there for a reason and no Toddy there not to be broken.DG will no doubt have a fine in mind to punish the Dogs disobedience.100k sounds about right. KP
 

gong_eagle

First Grade
Messages
7,655
Bulldogs dealt blow in sponsors stoush

Brad Walter and Glenn Jackson | April 17, 2009
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/lhq...sponsors-stoush/2009/04/16/1239475001065.html




The Bulldogs' hopes of convincing the NRL to allow its $2 million sponsorship deal with Strathfield Group have been dealt a major blow following revelations a rival club recently had a proposed deal with the company rejected.
As Bulldogs officials last night prepared to email what they believe is a solution to the stand-off over exclusivity rights held by Telstra, the Herald learnt that a $300,000 per season sleeve sponsorship deal with Strathfield Group was knocked back when another club approached the NRL for approval.
Telstra, which pays about $12 million a season for naming rights to the premiership, specifically listed Strathfield Group's previous incarnation - Strathfield Car Radio - as a company it considered a competitor and therefore not allowed as a sponsor of the game when it re-signed as the NRL's major backer in 2007.
However, the Bulldogs argue Strathfield Group's core business is not telecommunications and therefore the three-year deal should proceed.
"If this was 12 months ago, we would have just put a line straight through it but the Bulldogs want to state their case," NRL marketing manager Paul Kind said.
The Bulldogs will also learn today whether they have been granted leave to appeal against the NRL's decision to dock them two points for having 14 players on the field when Ben Roberts scored the match-winning try against Penrith in round two.
Elsewhere, Timana Tahu dismissed as "crap" reports a representative of his had approached the Sydney Roosters about an NRL return. "I'm not going over to league," Tahu said. "I've two years still on my [ARU] contract. I'm happy where I am."
The Roosters yesterday parted ways with long-time official Richard Fisk, who is said to be a victim of restructuring at the club, even though his departure was sudden. Fisk was the club's general manager of marketing and media, but leaves after 11 years in the front office. Fisk has always been a right-hand man of influential chairman Nick Politis, and in a statement the club boss extended his thanks to Fisk "for his service and contribution to the Sydney Roosters and wished him the very best for the future".
And Australian coach Tim Sheens has warned there are no selection guarantees for the May 8 Test against New Zealand in Brisbane as he ponders his first Kangaroos side.
"It just comes down to what happens in three weeks' time," Sheens said. "There is a lot of football to be played yet before you start putting people into who will and won't play in that."
While he admitted his own Tigers side's form - or lack thereof - would harm the prospects of some players of making the representative scene this year, Sheens still felt hooker Robbie Farah had done enough for NSW selection despite impressive claims from Bulldogs rake Michael Ennis.
"I wouldn't swap Robbie Farah for any hooker in the game. I can't say any more than that," he said. "I think it's healthy for Rob to know he can't just expect something and is going to have to work hard for it, [but] after a tough pre-season for Robbie, in particular, I think he is showing a lot of courage and a lot of improvement in his game.
"The fact there is two hookers, half a dozen halfbacks and a dozen second-rowers all vying for spots is probably the health of the game."
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Interesting comment from Kind "if it was 12 months ago we would've put a line straight through it"... obviously he's interested in what the 'Dogs approach is.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
Timmy...time to face it that if they weren't prepared to allow Strathfield to be a sleeve sponsor for another team, they are not going to allow Strathfield to be a major sponsor of the Bulldogs.
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
14 players on the field, Sponsor deals going sour, crowd fights... Not having a great time or it, the Bulldogs.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
I just read in the Telegraph that Strathfield handed out shirts at the game on Monday night - has it crossed anyone's minds that Strathfield are doing this whole process just to get their name in the media knowing that they will never get their sponsorship approved but leveraging the media from it to boost their rejuvenated image? Is it possible they are just using the Bulldogs to get some very cheap publicity?

Have to ask again...how on earth did this get so far down the line without anyone asking the NRL if they would permit the sponsorship...
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
Of course Strathfield are milking every little bit of publicity they can out of this, now everyone knows they sell optus, that they sell radios, home entertainment etc etc... This has probably been better for them than actually being on the shirt, just becuase they sponsor your team doesn't mean you're going to shop there first IMO.
 

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,415
I just read in the Telegraph that Strathfield handed out shirts at the game on Monday night - has it crossed anyone's minds that Strathfield are doing this whole process just to get their name in the media knowing that they will never get their sponsorship approved but leveraging the media from it to boost their rejuvenated image? Is it possible they are just using the Bulldogs to get some very cheap publicity?

Have to ask again...how on earth did this get so far down the line without anyone asking the NRL if they would permit the sponsorship...

Spot on...

Incompetence from the Bulldogs on this one.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
101,029
Well bottom line goes to the fact that by opposing the sponsorship, Telstra have given far more free publicity to the Strathfield Group than they would've otherwise got from the Bulldogs.

I got to thinking earlier, and yes Alex, yes furry, I'm aware of the exclusivity agreement... of the following comparison:

Here we have the NRL and their major backer Telstra through an exclusivity agreement not allowing a company that has many arms of it's business, ONE of them being an Optus re-seller.

On the flipside, we have the AFL and their major backer Toyota, and they have no problem with the Geelong "Ford" Cats or North Melbourne "Mazda" Kangaroos.

It shows you how much the NRL is dragging the chain when exclusivity agreements like this one exists, especially in these economic times when clubs are struggling to find sponsorship as it is...
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
NRL or Telstra? I mean, if Telstra wanted that as part of ponying up $12 Million to sponsor the league then what was the NRL to do? Hold out for the other $12 Million prospective sponsors to agree to a deal without that sort of agreement?

Get real Timmah...there are only so many companies with the sort of budget to pay that sort of cash and the NRL are hardly in the position where they can dictate terms.
 

Latest posts

Top