downward pressure interpretation went years ago, you are right it was sliding off the ball, but it never actually came off, so when the ball hit the turf, he still had contact on it
You're completely right of course.
I'm just glad the bunker had the common sense to rule the old way.
There are different points of view on this. Im in the school of the following. There are 2 aspects to a try. 1) getting the ball to and over the try line. 2) control of the football when placing the ball on the ground with downward pressure to signify a try.
For some reason, the NRL have steadily moved away from this interpretation. I dont know why. A finger tip sliding off the ball at the time the ball touches the ground with no downward pressure is not a try. Bouncing a ball is not a try in my book either. Never was and never should ever be.
Even though Bunker make egregious decisions every game (including tries) the decision to overturn the try given by the ref was the correct thing to do. There were sufficient camera angles to see the player was not in control of the ball. Sometimes there are not enough angles to overturn a decision.
Common sense prevailed. I am glad that following the "letter of the law" isnt always the norm in the bunker, (though it seems like it at times).
Be interesting to see if Annesley says anything about it on Monday.