What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NRL rebellion: Rugby league clubs want CEO Dave Smith gone or threaten to leave comp

undertaker

Coach
Messages
11,004
Already done.

:lol:Awesome!

Love to see Bourbs have a meltdown, like she did on Nova FM in Brisbane after the Matt Johns saga in 2009 where one of the female radio hosts at Nova had a go at Bourbs, only for Bourbs to chuck a dummy spit (because she didn't side with her) and hang the phone up.

And regarding Slothfield's "RSL sunburn" face, maybe it wasn't because of the bottle all those years but because of what is demonstrated in the pic

Edit: it was Meshel Laurie who had a go at Bourbs.

This is pretty funny.

From the SMH:

From News:

It's not funny; it's sad the mob who are subscribers to News Ltd papers will gobble up their "journalism" as truth
 
Last edited:

some11

Referee
Messages
23,676
Don't forget to use the stupid hashtags from their shows.

jimmy.jpg

I love you all.

P.s. if any of these merkins are on here gauging the interest of their diarrhea, just like the song says - you're going to reap just what you sow.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,932
I think the big bear that has been poked isn't Rupert, it's the nrl fans.
We are usually a divided bunch with our own interest and agendas, but it's been amazing that the majority of fans (even some broncos fans!) are calling out news ltd for their bullshit. Its actually uniting the code

Yep, we might put sht on our own game at times but we won't stand by and let media bags who are just leeching off the game do it. Beware upsetting the RL army!
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
Companies, governments, customers and small business usually have at least 3 tenders to stop corruption and kickbacks...and getting the best deal. This is often a legal and compliance requirement.

David Smith... just said i will do this in secret...with one customer bidding against himself....

...With a bid that couldn't be beaten.
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
News Corp to demand Fox Sports Saturday NRL game from Nine
Darren Davidson The Australian,

News Corp executives will demand the National Rugby League reverse its controversial decision to strip the top-rating Saturday evening match from Fox Sports.
It is understood that the Nine Network, which secured the game as part of its $925 million TV rights deal with the NRL, has not ruled out surrendering the game ? provided Fox Sports agrees to sell Nine a Saturday Australian Football League game.

Sources said Fox Sports, wholly owned by News, would refuse to even contemplate paying a premium for rights to the remaining NRL matches unless it can regain control of the prized Saturday match

It is understood Mr Gyngell is prepared to trade the Saturday match if Fox Sports is prepared to sell him a Saturday AFL fixture under the recently signed $2.508 billion record deal.


Asked if he was a seller, Mr Gyngell told The Australian: ?We don?t want to sell anything, and we?re very happy with what we?ve bought. We think it?s the best deal for Nine.?
This is significant because it shows Mr Gyngell appears willing to offload one of his four prime- time matches to defray high costs, and eliminate the burden of having too many NRL matches on Nine?s primary channel, putting a squeeze on scarce inventory.

Any move to hand the Saturday match back to Fox Sports, needs Mr Gyngell to sell the wholesale rights back to the NRL,

It?s also believed Mr Gyngell has ruled out selling one of his four top picks to the Seven and Ten networks because he does not want to share the code?s sponsors with another free-to-air operator in a tough advertising market. This would boost for Fox Sports?s chances of retaining the Saturday match,

Sources say News Corp will not match the $530m figure, let alone pay $700m. ?The value of the remaining rights is significantly less,? one source said, noting that a $400m price tag had even been proposed during private discussions last week.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...l-game-from-nine/story-e6frg996-1227495525671

So basically Nine sells Sat rights back to NRL who then sells them to Fox.

So Fox just offered 400 million for NRL. Didn't they just pay 1.3 billion for AFL? What a joke.
 

Johnny88

Juniors
Messages
1,335
So Fox just offered 400 million for NRL. Didn't they just pay 1.3 billion for AFL? What a joke.

Yeah its hard to believe such a low offer compared to the AFL and most AFL games clash on Fox on Saturdays and Sundays. I guess news feel entitled to NRL for peanuts.
 

cleary89

Coach
Messages
16,483
Ive had a pretty funny email exchange with bourban around the matty johns scandal, full of spelling mistakes and all.
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
Yeah its hard to believe such a low offer compared to the AFL and most AFL games clash on Fox on Saturdays and Sundays. I guess news feel entitled to NRL for peanuts.

Exactly and this bullshit some people are spewing here saying we have nothing to sell cause the "best games" are on CH9. Last time I checked the AFL not only have the best games on CH7, they also get FTA coverage that goes against Foxtel in local markets.

I don't see the Lions v Demons on AFL's CH7's FNF (that goes to FOX), but if I'm in Brisbane I get Lions games EVERY week LIVE in HD.

If Fox simulcast the NRL they get more of their #1 rating program and more people preferring their coverage to CH9's. No-one has even suggested FTA will get ALL Storm matches Live into Melbourne... I don't understand the logic behind fans talking down of the worth.
 
Last edited:

DiegoNT

First Grade
Messages
9,378
I don't get the 'four worst games' rhetoric
The 4 worst game of nrl are streaks ahead anything the afl can produce.
Due to the nature of the comp, it's not unusual for well supported teams to be at the bottom end of the ladder.
Getting foxtel will be the only way to see my team every week and every game.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,620
I don't get the 'four worst games' rhetoric
The 4 worst game of nrl are streaks ahead anything the afl can produce.
Due to the nature of the comp, it's not unusual for well supported teams to be at the bottom end of the ladder.
Getting foxtel will be the only way to see my team every week and every game.

Not to mention, that they demand sub standard games during Origin, with half the squad missing so clearly they are happy with "weak" games. Because it rates it's arse off

Shit, NYC out rates most sport
 
Last edited:

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,136
I don't get the 'four worst games' rhetoric
The 4 worst game of nrl are streaks ahead anything the afl can produce.
Due to the nature of the comp, it's not unusual for well supported teams to be at the bottom end of the ladder.
Getting foxtel will be the only way to see my team every week and every game.
Because it's bullshit and suits the news agenda. Just like they've been after 'admin costs' and the 'Maserati driving millionaire and his welsh banker' from day one. They want less money in administration so we have shit people they can easily manipulate. Agenda driven crap is all you get from them.
 

bobmar28

Bench
Messages
4,304
A poor effort by Media Watch.

Had a dig at Rupert always preferring VFL.

The rest of it was analysing the benefit of live sport on FTA.

They said League had a predominently male demographic and VFL had a broader audience.

Apparently that made VFL TV rights a better proposition.

No mention of the journalistic atrocities committed by News Corp.

The only thing the ABC hates more than Murdoch is the patriarchy.

Pathetic.

The ABC have always promoted AFL.
 
Messages
15,499
Also interesting to note that Telstra have come out over night and denied the claims fro News Ltd that they are relinquishing their naming rights to the NRL. They have in bfact said they are deep into discussions with the NRL to extend their deal.
 
Messages
15,499
The following article is taken from The Age's website (but was also published in today's Sydney Morning Herald in the business section) -

Telstra denies News Corp reports it is considering exiting NRL sponsorship deal
Date: August 24, 2015 - 9:22PM
by Max Mason and John Stensholt

Telstra has denied it is considering ending a 17-season partnership with the National Rugby League as its naming-rights sponsor.

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp Australia reported the telco was on the verge of giving up its naming-rights sponsorship, which it has held since 2001, and would seek to stay on as only a minor sponsor.

But Telstra, which jointly owns pay TV operator Foxtel with News Corp, told The Australian Financial Review on Monday the reports were false and that it was in dialogue with the NRL regarding an extension to its current deal.

"Reports that Telstra is looking to not renew our NRL naming rights are untrue," a Telstra spokesperson said. "We are proud of what we have built with the NRL to date and are in negotiations to continue our partnership beyond 2017. We are unable to comment further as negotiations are ongoing."

An NRL spokesperson welcomed the Telstra statement, saying that while the rugby league governing body would not discuss ongoing sponsorship or broadcast rights negotiations, "Telstra is a long-term and valued partner and we naturally look forward to further discussions with them".

The Australian Financial Review reported last week that Telstra was still interested in negotiating NRL broadcast rights, even after signing a big deal with the AFL earlier in the week.

Telstra group managing director of media and marketing Joe Pollard said the telecommunications giant was still keen on the NRL, which it has digital rights for. "We are still talking to the NRL and are still in negotiations," Ms Pollard said. "We are still interested in a range of sports."

It comes as part of a concerted campaign from News Corp to put pressure on the NRL, following the league's apparent snubbing of News Corp when it negotiated the free-to-air and free streaming broadcast rights with Nine Entertainment Co for $925 million and without Foxtel, which is 50 per cent owned by News Corp.

Previously, the pay TV, free-to-air and digital rights have been negotiated at the same time. However, it is understood Nine preferred to come to the table without Foxtel.

Though Nine has streaming right as part of its new deal, which does not begin until the 2018 season, the NRL still has the mobile and tablet rights for all eight games a round on the market, as well as pay TV rights.
Telstra, the incumbent mobile rights holder, is the most likely partner for the NRL, though Optus has also indicated it could be interested in sports rights.

News Corp, Telstra and Seven West Media last week signed a massive $2.5 billion six-year deal for AFL rights. Telstra agreed to pay about $300 million of that for streaming rights extending its agreement to become the AFL's official technology and data partner.

Telstra will also show a version of the AFL app through its upcoming Telstra TV service, including highlights packages and video of full matches on a 12-hour delay.

Meanwhile, Mr Murdoch's media empire has taken another blow with British rival BT Sports securing a deal with Cricket Australia as its overseas broadcast partner.

The five-year deal is believed to be worth £80 million ($172.5 million) and begins in October 2016.

Reports suggested that BT Sport outbid Sky, which is 39 per cent owned by Mr Murdoch's 21st Century Fox, by £20 million.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,465
not sure how credible it is, but couldn't be any worse than the telegraph!
NRL BROADCAST RIGHTS: GOOGLE KNOCKING HARD ON DAVE SMITH’S DOOR
27/8/2015 1 Comment

NRL CEO Dave Smith has a potential ace up his sleeve in negotiations for rugby league’s broadcast rights from 2018 – internet giant Google.

YouTube, the global content aggregator owned by Google, wants a slice of the NRL’s digital media rights and the internet giant’s executives are working hard behind the scenes to convince the NRL they are part of the solution to help offset a likely low ball offer from Foxtel for pay-for-view TV rights from 2018.

According to an industry insider with knowledge of sports media rights, YouTube are actively pushing to be a part of a new broad base digital and pay-for-view broadcast media rights offering when the NRL commission decides what paid and digital media services it wants to give fans under a new deal from 2018 to 2022.

According to the source, YouTube projects new technology and mobile media is likely to grow to such an extent in the next five years, the NRL should look to bundle pay and digital offerings to fans in a deal that would reap new income and revenue streams for the game.

“The new and digital media landscape is moving so fast that channels used to broadcast sport in 2015, will be very different to the way sports like the NRL be broadcast in three to five years time,” the media rights insider said.

“Google, via YouTube are coming hard and want piece of the next broadcast rights deal. Like they have done with other sports overseas, they’ve run the ruler over NRL as the perfect type of sport that suits tight frame video and mobile screen viewing. Most of the action involving all 26 players happens in a condensed area on screen, making it ideal for viewing on TV screens, laptops or most importantly phone and small mobile technologies that continue to evolve and improve.”


“YouTube sport content that has lots of views online, revolves around tight shots where most of the action is front and centre. That gives advertisers an opportunity to overlay ads close to the action. Of all the major sports available to new content aggregators, NRL is right up there with meeting those criteria. The potential revenue that could come the NRL’s way from seeded ads overlayed on coverage of games is massive.”


As written by SMH rugby league columnist Steve Mascord in recent days, way back in 1994, the then ARL discussed the idea of setting up their own TV channel to broadcast games. Those discussions haven’t been forgotten. However, the NRL is unlikely to create its own NRL TV channel. Both the available technology and low cost operator models employed by the content aggregators means the NRL could reap more from being a content provider and letting the likes of the aggregators and online search/advertising experts (Google and YouTube) bring more fans and revenue to the game.

If the NRL believe they will receive and accept a low ball Foxtel offer for pay television rights on the back of the pay TV operator having one less game to show each week from 2018, the top up of the NRL’s coffers may come from Google’s deep pockets by way of a broadened and sophisticated digital media offering to fans from 2018.

Can that be a bad thing? Certainly not for fans, the NRL and ultimately the clubs. Maybe not so good for News?

Foxtel is no doubt aware of the potential for a new, cheaper ‘middleman’ to come in and take away some of their revenues by being able to offer the NRL more lucrative pathways to attract fans, advertisers and commercial partners.

Hence why the campaign is on in earnest from some in the media to undermine Smith’s game plan. How convenient they forget they are actually criticising Smith for what he was first hired to do. Grow revenues and bring more fans to the game.

A few weeks back Smith was a lauded a genius. He signed off on a fantastic $925 million free-to-air TV rights deal with Channel 9 and was praised by fans and critics alike for negotiating four free-to-air games per week from 2018. Then the AFL bobbed up with a staged managed media event trumpeting a bigger $2 billion plus deal that included free-to-air and pay-for-view rights over a longer period of time.

The same people claiming Smith as a hero of the game and fans two weeks back, have now turned on him like a rabid dog. News Ltd, feeling scorned by Smith’s free to air deal that gave Channel 9 an extra free to air game each week at the expense of the News owned Foxtel, is leading the feeding frenzy.

Yet, while many in the rugby league community, including several clubs, have apparently turned on Smith since the AFL deal was made public, if the NRL is indeed negotiating with the likes of Google and YouTube, Smith and his team could have a revenue master plan that would potentially be a boon for fans and the game.

And despite the outcry from critics, many aligned to News Ltd, who claim Smith has alienated Foxtel to the extent that Foxtel will significantly reduce its offer for future pay-for-view rights, Smith should stick to his guns. It is in the long term interests of the game to strongly consider partnering with the likes of Google and YouTube or similar content aggregators under a new 5 year digital and pay TV from 2018 – even if it has ramifications for the NRL’s relationship with News and Foxtel. Revenues and fans are the number one priority.

What Smith’s critics haven’t bet on is his resilience and smarts. And Foxtel has a problem. With declining revenues and competition from non sporting content producers and products available to consumers from the likes of Netflix, Presto and Stan, Foxtel needs the NRL more than the NRL needs Foxtel.

Smith is betting on it.
http://www.sumnerwinter.com/sumners...or?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook
 

Latest posts

Top