Maybe the final 10 issues werent a big dealSounds like hes caved in, just like he did to the tv execs lol
When is the ARLC ratification meeting?
Last edited:
Maybe the final 10 issues werent a big dealSounds like hes caved in, just like he did to the tv execs lol
I still reckon it could’ve been resolved sooner over a Yum-Cha and few dozen Crown Lagers. Yum-Cha and Crownies make the world go round.
Not to mention a bill at the end of it that nobody understands. But why question it with so many smiley faces on it?When people say Australia and it's cities have no culture I point to this.
Where else in the world do important business deals get done in a room full of carts the Cantonese themselves stopped using decades and decidedly ordinary beer?
Not to mention a bill at the end of it that nobody understands. But why question it with so many smiley faces on it?
Maybe the final 10 issues werent a big deal
When us the ARLC ratification meeting?
What proof do you have? I’m calling bullshit and it’s just your agenda because you didn’t get a team in 2012/13 like you hoped you were getting from John Grants announcementSounds like hes caved in, just like he did to the tv execs lol
But…. You were basically supporting the RLPA, saying their requests were reasonable and that the NRL should be agreeing to them, so surely, if PVL has stepped in and ‘done the right thing’, wouldn’t you give him credit for that?Sounds like hes caved in, just like he did to the tv execs lol
I think there's a middle ground. I agree PVL got the TV deal badly wrong for all the reasons PR says and we're still getting about half of what was promised for the grounds but the Dolphins, NRLW, Expansion, Unbreakable code etc, he deserves full marks.But…. You were basically supporting the RLPA, saying their requests were reasonable and that the NRL should be agreeing to them, so surely, if PVL has stepped in and ‘done the right thing’, wouldn’t you give him credit for that?
Seems to me that you’ve put yourself in a position where PVL simply can never do good;
If he’s agreed to the players requests (which you’d claimed were fair and reasonable), he’s ‘caved in’.
If he continues to stand his ground - he’s being unreasonable….
Truth is, most likely, he’s done exactly what he said he would if the RLPA got round the table, with other senior parties (in addition to Clint) - got the deal done in 48 hours! I’m sure there will have been some give and take on both sides, but even if there wasn’t, he’s got the deal done - surely that’s worth some credit, even from you?
If you can’t give him credit here, and still use it as a vehicle to hammer him, then you’ve really got no credibility, and it is ultimate proof that you’re either completed blinded by your agenda against PVL (or just an attention seeking troll as many on here already state)… I’ve tried to take you at face value and on the assumption you’re being genuine with your views, and I’m hoping that is the case. Sometimes, as much as it might sting, you have to give credit where it is due, even to people you really REALLY don’t like.
Our tv deal isn’t as bad as pvl haters make itI think there's a middle ground. I agree PVL got the TV deal badly wrong for all the reasons PR says and we're still getting about half of what was promised for the grounds but the Dolphins, NRLW, Expansion, Unbreakable code etc, he deserves full marks.
I think there's a middle ground. I agree PVL got the TV deal badly wrong for all the reasons PR says and we're still getting about half of what was promised for the grounds but the Dolphins, NRLW, Expansion, Unbreakable code etc, he deserves full marks.
That’s nonsense. The nrls revenue isnt going up by $215mill this year lolNot sure the TV deal is bad.
We won't no for sure for a couple of years but the players have 35% of revenue. They get $1.3b
That would make the total revenue just over $4b for the 5 year period.
TV is 60%?
That’s nonsense. The nrls revenue isnt going up by $215mill this year lol
So @Perth Red you’ve not responded to this…. Going to give PVL any credit?But…. You were basically supporting the RLPA, saying their requests were reasonable and that the NRL should be agreeing to them, so surely, if PVL has stepped in and ‘done the right thing’, wouldn’t you give him credit for that?
Seems to me that you’ve put yourself in a position where PVL simply can never do good;
If he’s agreed to the players requests (which you’d claimed were fair and reasonable), he’s ‘caved in’.
If he continues to stand his ground - he’s being unreasonable….
Truth is, most likely, he’s done exactly what he said he would if the RLPA got round the table, with other senior parties (in addition to Clint) - got the deal done in 48 hours! I’m sure there will have been some give and take on both sides, but even if there wasn’t, he’s got the deal done - surely that’s worth some credit, even from you?
If you can’t give him credit here, and still use it as a vehicle to hammer him, then you’ve really got no credibility, and it is ultimate proof that you’re either completed blinded by your agenda against PVL (or just an attention seeking troll as many on here already state)… I’ve tried to take you at face value and on the assumption you’re being genuine with your views, and I’m hoping that is the case. Sometimes, as much as it might sting, you have to give credit where it is due, even to people you really REALLY don’t like.
So @Perth Red you’ve not responded to this…. Going to give PVL any credit?
going to be controversial
going to be controversial