Lowdown
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,062
Bomber said:I wonder if the NRL would be so helpful to the Storm when Inglis comes off contract?
Let's hope so...we're one of those cattle lining up now the gate is open...
Bomber said:I wonder if the NRL would be so helpful to the Storm when Inglis comes off contract?
Lowdown said:NRL showing again how to put the cat amongst the pigeons, and get everyone arguing amongst themselves and not focusing on the actual game...FFS.
Surely they have to understand the basic principle of consistency? Once you open that gate, its impossible to shut. And now this gate is swinging in the breeze and the cattle is just lining up...
If you are going to have a salary cap...then f**king enforce the damn thing, without exception. If Johns wants to go to Union...they should have f**king let him go ruin whats left of his career. If the Dogs are worried about SBW, then stiff sh*t. This entire competition hinges on the premise of fairness and equality. Once those principles are tarnished, the NRL might as well pack up and leave town...and allow some professionals to run the game.
Bomber said:I wonder if the NRL would be so helpful to the Storm when Inglis comes off contract?
Captain_Fred said:Oh I get it. You're calling me racist because I said you had one kiwi confused with another, as they all look the same. Nice try, but no.
Captain_Fred said:No, you're thinking of Bunji. If you think you were thinking about SBW, then I think you're a f**king moron.
mattyg said:Lets say that SBW signed a deal $400,000 per year for 5 years...Bulldogs look at the team who signs his books, realise we offered him more however he signed for less at another team. Starts to look a bit dodgey to our team. We could consider taking the NRL to court to fight the cap, which will wipe out the whole idea of a salary cap since it is illegal on so many levels. IMO the NRL are just protecting there own best interests, however to me it shows that they have little confidence in the idea of a cap.
Jake the snake said:Is that Legal??
I'd have a problem assisting a team who didn't produce a star to keep him.OVP said:How come they didnt help the Roosters out with Fittler?
Thank you Phool Gould.OVP said:when are you people going to FINALLY understand it ? The Salary Crap is totally ILLEGAL on ALL LEVELS. When the NRL choose to help finance one or two players to enable their clubs to afford them, then maybe we should ALL think of raising it to 5 million or just scrap it all together. IT will only be an uneven playing ground for a small amount of time. Look at Souths ... the clubs are smarter than the rest of you idiots who love this boring Salary Crap.
Rotten Rooster said:The whole cap system is illegal, I reckon if on player took it to court the whole system would be dismantled.
Johns Magic said:Since when do the Dogs abide to the salary cap anyway?
nqboy said:Yeah, it's, like, a new policy they have.
nqboy said:I'd have a problem assisting a team who didn't produce a star to keep him.
mattyg said:ummm...your only allowed a certain amount in 3rd party deals with the 3rd party a club sponsor. Any other 3rd party deals which don't count under the cap come from external companies not affilated in any way with the club. So whats your point Danish about us being too lazy to line up deals? Any club who does arrange for 3rd party must comply with the 3rd party section of the salary cap, which IIRC is 50k in deals for 3rd parties affilated with the club. Companies not linked with the club can pay players whatever they like for promotional work i think, however it isn't up to the club to arrange these deals, as im 99% sure the club is in breach of the cap if they do this.
Rocco said:actually tard danish is right and your wrong and you have always been wrong.