It's easy to say that size past experience shouldn't come into it although they are selecting a team to win the match. Hence versatility and utility value will come into it and size will definitely be a factor also as QLD traditionally pick big sizes. I hope and don't think past experience comes into it as the selection panel views each games and awards a tick to those who are deemed to have excelled. Then choose the make up of the teams based on overall performance and suitability to win the match. If this was a merit team and didn't play anyone like the NYC team of the year then I agree pick those that have had great years. But it's not, difficulty is also that teams like parra now play their best up in NYC from day one so winning the comp or indeed playing well might not be enough as someone in a 20s squad (and I don't think it should guarantee automatic selection) might be at a higher level. So guys like the parra players, fualolo from the dogs, haika from manly etc haven't had the chance to excel or be dominant in their own age group.
As scorcher said would be alot easy to debate if everyone wanted to put up their teams unfortunately very few have.
1 Tyrone Phillips souths
2Lavaka panthers
3 Kenner melbourne
4 Haika manly
5 Simona tigers
6 Moses tigers
7 Walker souths
8 trobjovic manly
9 Cherrington tigers
10 frazer eels
11 Pauli eels
12 fualalo dogs
13 cartright panthers
14 kamoto eels
15 tanginoa eels
16 Funaki tigers
17 one of the lolos souths