I didn't guarantee him anything ,you are putting words into my "mouth".Nor did I suggest a contract for 8 years is a good thing. And you have the temerity to bag someone's comprehension "pot v kettle champ" My argument has been he gets at least $1m pa ,which matches what many union players gets overseas.
You quoted someone who said it stating it as fact. You implied it was.
I have never said his contract didn't match what Rugby players in NZ and Europe are paid, I said its a desperate one off contract that would be insane to be repeated.
Half the time you don't understand exactly what you have stated.
So you're a mind reader now? More lies already.
I do independent research apart from here , to establish my findings i.e. News/Yahoo 7 and SMH as examples.Suggest with your narrow perspective you could do the same.
Since I was directly commenting on those articles posted that would be pointless.
Lying:lol:.Just trying to get the message through DCE deal is greater than you are trying to downplay it.
His deal is insane. I have not downplayed it. I have just said that the various links all tell a different story.
did I say you lacked comprehension? basic English skills as well it seems.
He makes no sense in his arguments. Apparently if I'm a talented 16/17 year old southern NZ rugby (sic) player and my future choices are:
1. Play Union in NZ on less money but hope to represent the all blacks
2. Play Union overseas and earn a $million but cant play for all blacks
3. Play league in southern NZ earn a $million and represent my country
Since those aren't the only choices, your argument is as pointless as you are.
he thinks few will choose number 3!
No, they will more likely choose one of the many other options.
ive seen first hand in WA what opening up NRL pathways does for players making these choices and its been positive for NRL. That will be a big benefit for a 2nd NZ team, more talented kiwi players in the game.
Starting a team with only a bucket of cash is not establishing pathways.