Special K
Coach
- Messages
- 19,599
I think it's wrong to compare the two cases tbh.
The Sharks issues are over a 6 week period in 2011 which was stamped out as soon as their club doctor found out what Dank was doing, a lot of the players probably don't even remember what they took under Dank and Sharks management had no idea. Essendon's issues are over the entire 2012 season and the head coach and perhaps even management knew about the entire program and ticked off on it. (so now they are blaming a fake letter)
One looks like a case bordering on systematic doping, the other looks like a rogue sports scientist.
This is what I am thinking. I still can't understand how Dank in 6 weeks could cause such issues given the time he has spent at other clubs. Surely his Cronulla stint was his shortest?