What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Organised crime and drugs in sport investigation part III

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rosetta

Juniors
Messages
683
Yeah back page of the tele tomorrow reveals 8 Sharks players were willing to take a 6 month ban for compensation, Paul Gallen one of these players.
 

Spot On

Coach
Messages
13,902
And ASADA couldn't even get that right. They have made an art of shooting themselves in the foot. No dodgy deals with the AFL and this may have been over months ago. So where does this leak come from? The tap is well and truly on now.
 

magpie4ever

First Grade
Messages
9,992
Some posters continually attack the messenger (investigator) and do not talk about the real issue - sportspeople cheating by taking performance enhancing supplements to gain an advantage.

If and when players and officials (from whatever code or sport) are named and suspended, I say bloody great stuff; get the cheats out of these sports.
 
Messages
8,666

Garbler

Juniors
Messages
286
Some posters continually attack the messenger (investigator) and do not talk about the real issue

Stop whining you b!tch; you got found out. This sound familiar:

If as some have predicted AFL players receive no penalty whilst having admitted to or found to taken performance enhancing supplements; I will join the chorus of people questioning the integrity of ASADA and question whether deals were done.

Answer: Jobe Watson. AFL is allowing a confessed drug cheat to keep playing. No ifs, buts or maybes.

Also who the f**k is leaking documents to DT/News ltd?
 

Card Shark

Immortal
Messages
32,237
Yeah back page of the tele tomorrow reveals 8 Sharks players were willing to take a 6 month ban for compensation, Paul Gallen one of these players.

Wasnt this part of the original news of ASADA, that the club was trying to broker deals with players. Didnt name names but it was definitely reported a few months back.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theleader.com.au/story/1...oard-saw-deal-offer-made-to-essendon/?cs=1507
ASADA INVESTIGATION: Sharks Board 'saw deal offer made to Essendon'

CRONULLA Sharks board members saw a copy of the preferential deal offered to the Essendon AFL club in February this year.

But after the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) team investigating the alleged use of peptides by Essendon and Sharks players denied its very existence, the lawyer representing ASADA quit the case.

The Leader understands that after the Australian Crime Commission had released its report on drugs in sport, a meeting was called between ASADA and the Cronulla Sharks over the alleged use of prohibited supplements in 2011.

Representatives of the Sharks, including members of the club’s old board, were in the room along with NRL legal counsel Tony Whitlam, QC, the integrity head who chaired the meeting. So too, for a time, was new NRL chief executive David Smith, as well as players’ legal representatives.

It was after Smith left the meeting that discussions centred on detailed allegations against the players and what repercussions they might face. ‘‘There were about 20 people in the room,’’ said a former Sharks director. ‘‘We made no admissions of guilt or otherwise.

‘‘We indicated we believed a deal had been done or was in the process of being done with Essendon ... and we asked could we take that same deal.’’

When an ASADA officer denied there was a deal, and the Sharks insisted they had seen papers proving one had been at least offered to Essendon, then questions among the ASADA officials were raised.

The Sharks bitterly complained about preferential treatment being offered to the AFL club and not the Sharks, who understood the best-case scenario was a six-months ban for their players who co-operated.

‘‘They told us no deal had been offered or done with Essendon ... and that no deal would be cut with the Sharks.’’

The lawyer representing ASADA was not told about the document or the supposed deal which could prevent Essendon facing sanctions.

‘‘Within two days he resigned from the ASADA case,’’ said a Sharks source. ‘‘I believe he was misled.

‘‘Dave Smith was furious when he heard about the document, and complained to the federal government, including the [then] federal minister of justice, Jason Clare, and prime minister Julia Gillard.’’

The sackings of four football club members followed a Sharks internal investigation over the events of early 2011. It was followed by the defeat of the previous board of directors at the club’s annual general meeting.

However, the four staff dismissed have so far not been reinstated.

A preliminary interview of Sharks players came to a halt almost before it started, when ASADA investigators cut short an interview with acting captain, Wade Graham, in late April.

ASADA has since been granted increased investigative powers, with indications given they may resume planned interviews of Sharks players in Sydney next week.

Lawyers for the players have indicated the players would again assist the ASADA investigation.

But it is debatable if the lawyers would allow the same players to self-incriminate under questioning.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theherald.com.au/story/1654988/knights-silent-on-possible-asada-talks/?cs=306
Knights silent on possible ASADA talks
By BRAD WALTER, DANIEL LANE, ADRIAN PROSZENKO and BRETT KEEBLE
July 22, 2013, 11:02 p.m.

THE Knights would neither confirm nor deny speculation on Monday night that forwards Jeremy Smith and Kade Snowden were two of 30 NRL players asked to schedule interviews with the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA).

In a statement issued last night, the NRL said 30 players "and a number of support staff" had been given 48 hours to make arrangements to be interviewed by ASADA investigators. Those interviews will begin on August 1.

Knights chief executive Matt Gidley would not comment last night when asked by the Newcastle Herald whether Smith and Snowden had been contacted by the NRL.

Smith and Snowden were Cronulla players in 2011. ASADA's investigation is understood to focus on allegations Sharks players were given banned substances during 2011.

Snowden told the Herald on May 10 that he was not worried about the prospect of being interviewed by ASADA.

"I haven't heard anything. They've been in and talked to the Knights so I'll just leave it up to them, then they'll get to me," Snowden said.

Speaking to the media on March 10, shortly after the drugs scandal broke at Cronulla, Knights coach Wayne Bennett said he had not spoken to Smith or Snowden about the investigation.

"We're just getting on with business here, and Cronulla have got to sort themselves out first before they start worrying about anybody else," Bennett said.

The Knights were one of six NRL clubs referred to in February in the Australian Crime Commission's Project Aperio investigation into drugs in sport and organised crime.

Gidley joined chief executives from Canberra, Cronulla, Manly, North Queensland and Penrith at a February 12 meeting with the NRL integrity unit, then met privately with ASADA officials.

In a statement issued after those meetings, Gidley said: "While no specific details or players were mentioned by the ASADA representatives, they made it clear the Knights coaching staff and support team, and their procedures, were given the all-clear."

Cronulla players have no concerns about the resumption of interviews with ASADA and want a speedy resolution to the investigation into allegations of drugs use at the club.

Up to 14 Sharks players are among 30 players and support staff from various clubs told yesterday to schedule interviews with ASADA as part of its investigation.

After a previous round of interviews with NRL players was abandoned following a dispute over the level of co-operation provided by Cronulla's Wade Graham, the NRL will now have a representative sit in on interviews.

NRL chief operating officer Jim Doyle said the players, which include a number of former Sharks, were being advised of specific areas of inquiry and would be required to co-operate with investigators in line with their obligations under the game's anti-doping policy.

"ASADA has made it clear that the investigation is moving to an important stage and it remains in everyone's interests that we get these matters resolved," he said. "Players could face sanctions under the anti-doping policy if they are not found to have provided reasonable assistance. It is not possible to put a timeline on the outcomes of this investigation but it is important to ensure that everything possible is being done to get to a conclusion."

Fairfax Media understands talks next week will establish a timeframe and legal process.

While some Sharks players are "nervous" at being quizzed over doping allegations with up to two-year bans if charged, most "want to get it over and done with".
 

Card Shark

Immortal
Messages
32,237
Gal has just denied he tried to broker a deal with ASADA, just on Big Sports Breakfast.

Still doesn't know what he's done wrong - Was told they could roll over & accept a 6 month ban at the start.

Hasn't been personally told that he's been required for an interview but everything goes via lawyers, so they may have.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Gal has just denied he tried to broker a deal with ASADA, just on Big Sports Breakfast.

Still doesn't know what he's done wrong - Was told they could roll over & accept a 6 month ban at the start.

Hasn't been personally told that he's been required for an interview but everything goes via lawyers, so they may have.
Big Sports Breakfast ‏@skybigsports
  1. Paul Gallen told us that he never tried to broker any sort of a deal with ASADA.
 

betcats

Referee
Messages
23,956
Paul Gallen denied making any deal on the Radio this morning. Haven't read that article yet but he sounded a little bemused.
 

Frailty

First Grade
Messages
9,456
I posted something similar in the Sharks forum, but ultimately either the Telegraph or Gal is lying - and neither would surprise me.

However, where is the investigation into these 'leaks'. If these leaks do exist, than there are severe data protection issues in ASADA who would be dealing with the personal information of well known public figures, and would have to abide by the federal government Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF). These are significant breaches which have the potential to affect ongoing investigations. Why is there no investigation or action taken against the people responsible?

If the leaks are faked, than the Telegraph (not for the first time) would be opening itself up to a range of defamation cases against it, and they would be hard pressed to demonstrate innocence.

Either way, the federal government should be investigating these leaks, but seems like it does not want to act.
 

Diesel

Referee
Messages
23,781
Paul Gallen denied making any deal on the Radio this morning. Haven't read that article yet but he sounded a little bemused.

Perhaps, but his or the clubs legal team may have, and I'm sure he'd be aware if they have on his behalf
 
Messages
4,980
It would be interesting to know what peoples opinion on his matter would be if there wasn't an AFL club also involved in the scandal. Most of the time, 95% of posters on here couldn't give a f**k about what happens in AFL.

As an Eels supporter, I'd be outraged if the Sharks were allowed to get away with a systematic doping regime (albeit a short one) as has been alleged, just like as a Hawks supporter I'd be outraged if Essendon got away with their drugs program.

Is it really acceptible for a club in the NRL to cheat and get away with it, purely because a team from a "rival" code did the same thing and got away with it? I think the real issue is being lost in the inter-code rivalry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top