Cletus
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,171
Dessy says Manly are clean.
Awesome I can light my torch and grab my pitchfork.
Dessy says Manly are clean.
That is the reality,and your points are valid,what would determine an unfair advantage in a GF,the questions are endless,they need to name players and teams ASAP,to clear the innocent.When names & clubs are finally released things will only get worse.
Can you imagine the outcry if high profile players are rubbed out .Especially if they were QLD SOO players .
Would the results still stand?
Debate would never end about it .
The same with GF winning sides.
How many(convicted/suspended ) players would need to be a part of that team before the NRL decided that the win was null & void?
I hope it doesnt come to that & if any players are rubbed out ,they are just standard 1st graders.
Well if you had a brain in your melon you would realise I was talking about the ACC report. As in - the report which is the subject of this entire thread. As in - the report which supposedly has named 5 or 6 NRL clubs as the target of further investigation.
I remember why I don't come into the NRL section much anymore.
When names & clubs are finally released things will only get worse.
Can you imagine the outcry if high profile players are rubbed out .Especially if they were QLD SOO players .
Would the results still stand?
Debate would never end about it .
The same with GF winning sides.
How many(convicted/suspended ) players would need to be a part of that team before the NRL decided that the win was null & void?
I hope it doesnt come to that & if any players are rubbed out ,they are just standard 1st graders.
So if a criminal who the cops knew was dealing with NRL or AFL clubs in Australia jumped a plane to NZ and tried to fix a game or do some drug work over there, that the words "New Zealand Warriors" wouldn't appear in the report?
Even if the Warriors can't get into trouble from the ACC, surely they could get a mention if they had been part of a crime committed in Australia or by an Australian travelling to NZ?
How bad would it be if it was more the NSW SoO team... It's all speculation at this stage and anything we are saying now will change when we hear the players and club names.
The players will be tarred and rightly so, as should any coaches or off/on-field support. These people in the game are just custodians of the clubs. I hope it's only one or two per club max and not a whole club behind it because if I had played, supported or worked for a club and it came out they were drug cheats I'd be pretty f@cked off
It's like saying that any Australian based side goes to NZ and was drugged up while playing there would be ok because it happened in another country.
I don't get everyone's rush for clubs and players to be named.
"Clear the innocent" is a cop out.
It's a criminal investigation.
People have to be charged. Courts have to make decisions. Those charged have a right to defend themselves and appeal.
It's going to drag out. Have patience folks.
I don't get everyone's rush for clubs and players to be named.
"Clear the innocent" is a cop out.
It's a criminal investigation.
People have to be charged. Courts have to make decisions. Those charged have a right to defend themselves and appeal.
It's going to drag out. Have patience folks.
like constantly talking about afl ?
If any of the drug allegations are true then it is time to shut up shop for the various agencies that claim to monitor drugs in sport.
With recent international scandals, and now these local allegations, the drug testers are either inept or corrupt. Either way, they are not worth paying.
I don't get everyone's rush for clubs and players to be named.
"Clear the innocent" is a cop out.
It's a criminal investigation.
People have to be charged. Courts have to make decisions. Those charged have a right to defend themselves and appeal.
It's going to drag out. Have patience folks.
Has anyone rang Gids?