Desert Qlder
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,446
Case in point, hasn't Shorten stated that if elected, he'll give the drug-friendly code taxpayer money no matter what?
Link?
Case in point, hasn't Shorten stated that if elected, he'll give the drug-friendly code taxpayer money no matter what?
if Labor wins the next election then government funding to AFL won't be cut if they abondon WADA http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...-fault-says-bill-shorten-20160112-gm42j8.html
Labor tried to get them off in the first place and let Cronulla cop it all
AFL and Labor are as corrupt as each other
Case in point, hasn't Shorten stated that if elected, he'll give the drug-friendly code taxpayer money no matter what?
Huh ?
Sorry Parra I don't put much stock in an article by Rebecca Wilson
At least two former Essendon players considering Court of Arbitration decision appeal in Switzerland
At least two former Essendon players suspended over the AFL club's 2012 supplement regime are considering appealing against their ban in a Switzerland court, Western Bulldogs' president, and lawyer, Peter Gordon has said.
Stewart Crameri and VFL player Brent Prismall, who were among the 34 players banned after an appeal by the World Anti-Doping Authority was upheld in the Court of Arbitration of Sport earlier this month, are now at the Bulldogs.
When asked on 774 ABC Melbourne if the players were considering an appeal against the CAS decision, Mr Gordon replied "There well could be".
"I'm deeply troubled that what history will show these young men have been subject to one of the gravest injustices in Australian sporting history," he said.
Mr Gordon said he agreed with Essendon chairman Lindsay Tanner's opinion that the decision was "manifestly unfair".
"This CAS judgement contains factual errors, unsupported propositions of law, it applies findings that may be pertinent to one player and extrapolates it to all the other 33 players, often with no basis at all."
Mr Gordon said his son, Patrick Gordon, is representing Crameri and Prismall, but he is also involved.
"I don't think there is a way to get it before an Australian court, so if there is to be an appeal it would be to the Swiss federal tribunal, we've got 30 days to bring that, so I think the relevant date is about 10 February.
"I'm looking at it myself because we have two player involved in it, and I know the lawyers for the other 32 are investigating it."
He said the nature of the court system meant it was unlikely a hearing would begin before the start of the season, but lawyers could move for an urgent injunction to grant a stay on the ban.
"We've sought advice from Swiss lawyers on a range of issues and we're hoping to get that advice as soon as we can," he said.
The AFL Players Association has said it is also considering its legal options in the wake of the ban, including a possible compensation claim against the club.
Essendon fined $200,000 over supplements program for breaching workplace safety laws
Essendon Football Club has been fined $200,000 for breaching workplace safety laws over the handling of its 2012 supplements program.
The club was facing penalties of up to $600,000, but Magistrate Peter Reardon took into account Essendon's unblemished history and penalties it had already faced, including a $2 million fine from the AFL.
Worksafe Victoria brought the charges against Essendon in November, after a long investigation into the club.
Essendon pleaded guilty to two charges laid by WorkSafe of failing to provide a working environment that was safe and without risks to health.
Mr Reardon found the supplements program was conducted in a shroud of secrecy, with disregard for player safety as well as the youth and vulnerability of its players.
He said although no players had shown adverse side effects, the program was an invasion of their bodies by their employer.
The fine comes after the Court for Arbitration of Sport found 34 past and present players guilty of doping, banning them from participating in the 2016 season.
Last March, a tribunal found the players were not guilty of using banned substance Thymosin beta-4, relating to the club's supplements regime which was led by controversial sports scientist Stephen Dank.
The Australian Sports Anti-doping Authority, who had brought the case, chose not to appeal the decision, but the World Anti-Doping Agency exercised its right to appeal.
At least two of the suspended players are considering appealing against their ban in a Switzerland court.
The AFL Players Association said it was also considering its legal options in the wake of the ban, including a possible compensation claim against the club.
In an ABC interview last month, Former Essendon coach James Hird insisted he had no intention to cheat the system.
Will be completely ignored as the focus is on Pearce now
Will be completely ignored as the focus is on Pearce now