Green Machine
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,844
With all those pubs and clubs packed on State of Origin nights and the crowds in pubs and clubs on weekends watching NRL, I wonder what the true audience for Rugby league is,
Green Machine said:With all those pubs and clubs packed on State of Origin nights and the crowds in pubs and clubs on weekends watching NRL, I wonder what the true audience for Rugby league is,
Woods99 said:Are you stalking me, GM?
GAMEFIRST said:I am amazed at your consistent FICTIONAL remarks- I would add that you are the one stalking this LEAGUE forum.
Now i doubt that a YAWNION forum exists and if on the slight chance that it does, it obviously isn't exciting enough for you to indulge YAWNION's widespread discussion in Australian households of its success and related topics-if any!?
Finally, i would like to say as a general sports fan, that like the majority of Australians, including one self-confessed intellectual like yourself, the NRL is becoming the most exciting sport by an ascending margin because it is everything that YAWNION will never be- fun, tense, close, dramatic, tribal, gladiatorial, youthful, passionate and many other adjectives can be applied to describe why is it so!
For an intellectual like yourself to try and convince anyone otherwise means that either you are delusional to the extreme, which is very likely, or that you are so jealous of the NRL that by downgrading it somehow may close the gigantic gap between YAWNION and the NRL. In fact, these two sports should not be compared as they are on different pages of the novel-with the NRL FRONTPAGE always!
Green Machine said:With all those pubs and clubs packed on State of Origin nights and the crowds in pubs and clubs on weekends watching NRL, I wonder what the true audience for Rugby league is,
Woods99 said:Thanks for your comments. When you grow up and do some travelling, you will notice that most of the rest of the world thinks differently to you and the working class of Eastern Australia.
GAMEFIRST said:I travel 9 months of the calender year and the "rest of the world" definately don't have any passion for Rugby in Europe as some like intellectuals like your self make out.
Why?
Perhaps because its run by a very minor few rich, cash flush people who keep the game from totally sinking.
My time in England and New Zealand as well as Italy was dominated by soccer and surprisingly in NZ, I found NRL gets good newspaper coverage if not quite the YAWNION page numbers-but very close.
In England, including London people are aware of the big League clubs like Wigan, Leeds and St Helens-they have a HUGE touch competition aside from the ratings of SuperLeague matches on Sky being excellent, indicative of the size of their new tv-deal.
As for YAWNION, well the "rest of the world" must be going all quiet when there are other more entertaining sports to watch & comment about.
The YAWNION world game is so strong that it is the 4th rated sport in Australia & cannot even get free-to-air tv in SUPER 14-I WONDER WHY?
Your so called world game comes alive every 4 years for the so called world cup, but in between it is all sterile! lol![]()
Woods99 said:Who cares?
Woods99 said:The rest of the world knows a whole lot more about rugby than about league. So however much you belittle rugby, it is at least a viable international sport, with a recognised international body, a world cup which takes place every four years, and a strong international playing schedule. Notice any similarities with league? No, I thought not.
Mr_Ugly said:I don't think you're right about that Woods. I'd be surprised if either the satellite service or digital terrestrial tv had any feedback system. Surely this would require some sort of transmission mechanism from the home to "beam" the data back to the tv station. [EDIT: Have since been corrected about Foxtel Satellite - apparently relays info by phone line - my mistake!]
I have a couple of set top boxes for terrestrial digital tv (gives me a couple of extra channels in Tassie), and they certainly have no way to feed info back to the tv stations.
Woods99 said:Who cares?
Woods99 said:Who cares?
thatsgood said:Was this the highest rating State of Origin ever as far as the 5 capital audience? I heard that this was the first time origin has past the 2 million mark.
Green Machine said:You care Woods. Thats who cares. Plus the millions of other Australians. What did you think Woods, werent they a lovely set of numbers, those TV ratings, old c**k? Didnt you feel proud to be part of a huge TV audience, Woodsy?
GAMEFIRST said:Yes it reached 2.4 Mil accross all capital cities-if you add the regional viewers which they quoted to be 1.3 Mil, then you have a total Australian Tv audience of 3.7 Mil.
Woods99- You are so quiet lately that you may have deceased!:lol:![]()
Woods99 said:GM,
I care about the ratings for Origin Of the Species as much as I care about the ratings for "Big Brother", pro wrestling, or stock car racing.
I don't watch any of them.
Nor do I consider the ratings to be much more than a barometer of the mediocrity of popular taste.
Sorry to disappoint you.
International RL said:Woods must of been part of the 64,000 people watching the bloodyslow cup in melbourne on TV..union really is thriving down there! put a side down there quick to capitalise!
what a spectacle.
I'd hate to be a union administrator.
No free to air tv for the 'super' fagteen
Can't sell out test matches
no-one watching test matches on tv
no-one wants to buy the rights to the world cup
decreased pay tv deal for additional content/games
trying to prop up another franchise that is not making ends meet and can't win a chook raffle
Another unsupported unsustainable tier of the code about to be introduced.
No junior talent emerging to take the place of old hacks
No good leaguies wanting to come across
And no world cup in Australia coming to save you financially for over a decade!
oh oh hey woods?![]()