What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Origin clearly no longer the pinnacle

RoosTah

Juniors
Messages
2,257
Look at 95% of the posts in here,

"Time for Origin to die"
"Stop marketing it"
"Its time has passed"
"Need to stop playing it altogether"

My arguement is why do people want Origin to die also? Lets have a strong International Scence and Origin scence.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly what "95%" of the posts here want - no one is demanding the death of Origin - just an international scene that gets just as much or more attention than Origin currently does.

Most of the sentiment you're complaining about isn't really hate for Origin, it's bewilderment that it continues to demand so much better treatment than internationals despite the internationals fielding better players and being more evenly contested (in terms of our NZ rivalry at the very least, but England v NZ games are often great too).
 

RoosTah

Juniors
Messages
2,257
Haha same, it's weird to explain but I do find myself hoping the kiwis pull ahead and see if the Aussies can run them down. Also enjoy seeing any of the blues get smashed or make phayle plays.

I find the contest good, has the best players in the world. Just lacks the tribalism/rivalry that Origin has.

I kinda get that sentiment to be honest, but as a Rugby fan too I am a bit over seeing the Kiwis win :p .

That said, in terms of tribalism there is a ready made solution for the international scene that could bring the "hate and passion" back - for England to get their s### together.

If England were to beat Australia 5 years straight in internationals and rub it in in the way they're so famous for then I don't think many of us would be "cheering the underdog" and indifferent to the result - we'd be baying for English blood and the state rivalries would pale.

Sadly, the poor old poms don't look like doing that any time soon.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,101
I'm pretty sure that's exactly what "95%" of the posts here want - no one is demanding the death of Origin - just an international scene that gets just as much or more attention than Origin currently does.

Have a look here and in the international section, frankly they are. LU is the only place in the WORLD that wants Origin to be less successful and reduced in size and success. My attitude is that there is no reason why there can't be both of equal or even greater status.

Most of the sentiment you're complaining about isn't really hate for Origin, it's bewilderment that it continues to demand so much better treatment than internationals despite the internationals fielding better players and being more evenly contested (in terms of our NZ rivalry at the very least, but England v NZ games are often great too).

Treatment from who? The media? They death ride League at every turn so really who gives a f**k.

If you even looked at 1/10th of my posts you would know that I support international League 100%, and I've shouted down dickheads that say stuff like "Australia were poor, thats the only reason NZ won".

A stand alone weekend for Internationals is A+ treatment and the dumb arse media will catch on eventually as the ANZAC Test is going to get bigger and bigger. People forget that its a relatively new thing and hasn't been around as long as you think. (Mid season tests were always post Origin)
 

RoosTah

Juniors
Messages
2,257
Have a look here and in the international section, frankly they are. LU is the only place in the WORLD that wants Origin to be less successful and reduced in size and success. My attitude is that there is no reason why there can't be both of equal or even greater status.

Maybe they have - I'm not here often enough to say, but I haven't really noticed that and it's certainly not where I'm coming from on this and nor does it appear others on this thread think that way.

I just want the NRL to have a massive Test product that rivals or exceeds the Origin product they currently have. Just think how good that would be for the game

Treatment from who? The media? They death ride League at every turn so really who gives a f**k.

A stand alone weekend for Internationals is A+ treatment and the dumb arse media will catch on eventually as the ANZAC Test is going to get bigger and bigger. People forget that its a relatively new thing and hasn't been around as long as you think. (Mid season tests were always post Origin)

Not only the media mate, but the NRL too. Yeah, the stand alone weekend is good and all, but it feels all out of whack... The international season ought to come after Origin in my view and it should be an annual 3 test series against the kiwis.

In an ideal world I'd love to see the NRL scaled back to just 16 rounds plus finals (play each team once plus the bye) with Origin and internationals to follow.

That would generate a bit of scarcity for the regular season and also make each match mean just that little bit more, whilst injecting a bit more structure into the calendar by having rep occur in isolation and Origin serving both to crown state champs AND as a selection trial for the Roos.

I know TV dollars make that a hard nut to crack, so I just need to make my billions and buy the NRL.
 

TheFrog

Coach
Messages
14,300
Given that the test team has basically the Qld spine and core......

The Queensland spine and core are all a couple of steps short of palliative care, and played yesterday like they had never before met, even though they had enough pill to fill a pharmaceuticals warehouse. NSW should be able to rustle up a side to beat them, but the NSW coach appears to believe the answer is bash and barge. He considers Gallen to be his trump card. This strategy somehow won the day last season, I don't think it will again.
 

MightyMoo

Juniors
Messages
744
Origin still is for myself. There's more hype surrounding it. Maybe it's easier to relate to. I don't even like Tim Sheens and some of the players in the 17 yesterday. The Kiwis were too good. Some of our biggest names didn't aim up. The loss is far easy to take than a loss to the Blues. Maybe a few lean years for the Roos is what some fans need to find the passion again?
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,101
Maybe they have - I'm not here often enough to say, but I haven't really noticed that and it's certainly not where I'm coming from on this and nor does it appear others on this thread think that way.

I just want the NRL to have a massive Test product that rivals or exceeds the Origin product they currently have. Just think how good that would be for the game



Not only the media mate, but the NRL too. Yeah, the stand alone weekend is good and all, but it feels all out of whack... The international season ought to come after Origin in my view and it should be an annual 3 test series against the kiwis.

In an ideal world I'd love to see the NRL scaled back to just 16 rounds plus finals (play each team once plus the bye) with Origin and internationals to follow.

That would generate a bit of scarcity for the regular season and also make each match mean just that little bit more, whilst injecting a bit more structure into the calendar by having rep occur in isolation and Origin serving both to crown state champs AND as a selection trial for the Roos.

I know TV dollars make that a hard nut to crack, so I just need to make my billions and buy the NRL.


Showing a bit of historical ignorance there mate.

It's NZRL that want the ANZAC test scheduled where it is.They will never agree to play post Origin again.

They believe that Origin was to much of an advantage as Australia would be battle hardened after a 3 game series.

And frankly results bear that out.
 

isaiah

Bench
Messages
4,979
To be honest mate I reckon that's a more a reflection of Qld's intense parochialism. As a contest Aus v NZ is now higher quality and more even than Origin. Given that the test team has basically the Qld spine and core, the fact that NZ completely dominated such a star studded Aussie roster full of Qld greats it undermines the claim that Origin is truly elite.

For mine this test has MASSIVELY taken the shine off this year's Origin. You can't have the best of both NSW and QLD combined getting schooled and then claim their more diluted forms is some how the pinnacle.

It may be financially for the time being, but as a contest tests have clearly surpassed it.

But that's good for the game frankly, and we should be embracing it.

Funny like gus gould's comments during the test. He talked about the Aussie team getting old as talked up young nsw players as the ones to take over. Qld has as many good potential champions as nsw.
 

isaiah

Bench
Messages
4,979
The Queensland spine and core are all a couple of steps short of palliative care, and played yesterday like they had never before met, even though they had enough pill to fill a pharmaceuticals warehouse. NSW should be able to rustle up a side to beat them, but the NSW coach appears to believe the answer is bash and barge. He considers Gallen to be his trump card. This strategy somehow won the day last season, I don't think it will again.

Lol
 

Scubby

Juniors
Messages
395
It is absolutely not about wanting Origin to be less successful! You have to live outside Australia to understand the vibe about how International RL is perceived by Australians. I have watched every Origin for the last 20 years and love the contests.

You won't notice it but watch last year's Anzac test. During the commentary a number of times discussions break out about whether this person or that should be in the Blues/Maroons. No talk whatsoever about the make up of the test side for the autumn 4N. During the last part of the season we had legends of the Aussie game calling for the 4N to be cancelled because a few Aussie players had withdrawn.

We just want Australian players and public to feel that the green and gold is the pinnacle of the sport for them as we do here in the UK. It is getting frightening the number of World Class players who don't qualify for Origin anymore. Honestly, 10 years ago this was pretty much the best 30+ players on the planet. Now it is 15 of the best 34.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,101
It is absolutely not about wanting Origin to be less successful! You have to live outside Australia to understand the vibe about how International RL is perceived by Australians. I have watched every Origin for the last 20 years and love the contests.

You won't notice it but watch last year's Anzac test. During the commentary a number of times discussions break out about whether this person or that should be in the Blues/Maroons. No talk whatsoever about the make up of the test side for the autumn 4N. During the last part of the season we had legends of the Aussie game calling for the 4N to be cancelled because a few Aussie players had withdrawn.

We just want Australian players and public to feel that the green and gold is the pinnacle of the sport for them as we do here in the UK. It is getting frightening the number of World Class players who don't qualify for Origin anymore. Honestly, 10 years ago this was pretty much the best 30+ players on the planet. Now it is 15 of the best 34.

Your a dickhead if you think that Phil Gould and some tabloid fish wrap are represent Australian Rugby League fans views on the International game.

That's would be like me claiming that Steve-O and SKY TV represent the views off all English Rugby League fans.
 

Von Neumann

Juniors
Messages
157
That's what you call a non sequitur.

I absolutely want the game to thrive and honestly can't understand how you can think wanting the international game to be more successful than origin (as it should be) is in some way arguing for the sport's failure.

To suggest that is frankly bizarre in the extreme...

Also, you have to be kidding when you argue that Origin has never been sold as the pinnacle of anything and is simply seen as a grudge match. Only somebody who'd managed to miss the marketing and commentary around origin for the last 20 years could possibly buy that.

No, quite apart from wanting the game to fail, I want us to get to a place where Origin retains its place in the calendar and its great viewing numbers, but is followed by an even bigger and more successful international series against the Kiwis that supersedes the importance of the Bledisloe Cup in NZ and Origin here.

Why you don't want the international game to thrive is quite beyond me frankly.

This may be longish - but I will honestly, I swear to you, lay it all out for you guys. Dont worry about the Tests. Its heating up. I will go over the history of origin and tests as succinctly as possible and follow closely the surrounding events here that are of importance to the hypothesis that Origin is no longer the pinnacle.

I like your use of rational and sceptical argument. I think you've arrived at the right conclusions.

See, contrary to some others I think we will achieve what you outlined. Its not a preference of mine alone, as much as its a realisation I have long held. As such I am calling this whole thing a 'restoration' of international football as the pinnacle. Even if I didn't want this to be so, it will still happen.

The writing is on the wall. The test match is already more watched in australia than the bledisloe; in fact its the highest rating 5 capital city sporting event this year so far, surpassing even the afl anzac day clash and any other league game.

Something for people to take note of, is the nrls increased opinion and recognition of the value of the pacific region. This will create a gravity for the sport across the region including Australia.

Its only a matter of time before Test Football is held in high esteem again by all and sundry. Its not so obvious right now this year -- but it will become so.

They are saying that the australian Test side is the second most regarded national team in the country behind the cricket team. Thats something that has probably often been the case in the past, but its going to be so apparent in the years to come, that provided the competition for our country comes along continually and there's no reason why it won't be, then international league will take off. International league has the potential to garner more attention than Origin in the world, and in this country I'd wager it will in fact be more dear to peoples hearts than origin over time. None of this diminishes origin too much at all, just that its shifted. They operate at different times of the year, and draw upon different elements for their success.

The emphasis has shifted and the onus is upon the national bodies to support the RLIF to continue its good work. The recent meeting in brisbane seemed to tentatively hash out issues that will place the international game at the peak of the sport again in years to come.

And so it should be. Origin is no longer the pinnacle, the test match did demonstrate that; but neither will origin diminish too much over time, given its history. Being the pinnacle does not have to mean its better as such - if that were the case then Origin would have been unassailable forever. Its better this way because 2 things can exist instead of one.

But I think your claim is correct. Its just not apparent to most people. The realignment of things has already begun. The difference is that Origin will no longer prevent test football from breathing. Thats the big change. Its like they have swapped positions, but it doesn't mean origin has to diminish.

Need we remind people that Origin started in 1980. Test football was pretty big back then and in the 90s. Its a fallacy to suggest it can't be like that again; or that Origin existing prevents test football [right now], or that test football can't be the pinnacle which by virtue of how it works is exactly what it is. Even after we just witnessed such a match with our own eyes. Denial..... things take a while to be accepted. Origin was though a shock to the system.

Your a dickhead if you think that Phil Gould and some tabloid fish wrap are represent Australian Rugby League fans views on the International game.

That's would be like me claiming that Steve-O and SKY TV represent the views off all English Rugby League fans.

Except scubby has a point; please let me explain my own follow-up point about his point. . First lets not interject into what Gould thinks or the papers, they just muddy the issues here. Lets consider that 'then' when Gould said that, and the future are two different things. Lets consider people, you, me, the tv, as products of the environment they're in. In fact much of the press around this years Test has been incredibly positive and encouraging.

Link it all up. Australia lost this match and people are scratching their heads here. As scubby notes, origin used to be the best X amount of players in the world, now its a bit less. Well origin can still be a grudge match with a few less of the best players in the world. But if that ever reaches the level of RU's Reds v Warratahs for 30 years in a row, then watch out Origin. But still, digressing here. ...

Hold that in your mind, and think of this: people are a bit amused, and mythed at the same time that Australia lost and NZ won so convincingly, and to rub salt into the wound (however small such a wound may be to you) the kiwi's have done it for the last 3 times. AND Australia is probably not going to be number one.

Now add insult to injury - our side is getting on a bit and the kiwi's are on fire. Whats in most peoples hopes is for some new and up coming players to come into the side over time and flog those bloody kiwi's. That generates interest. Now we have a contest and we're not sure if we'll win. We've got those Kiwi's smack-talking us, giving us little gestures. We've got former champions looking bewildered.

Next: what do you expect a team of champions to do? Next time they will dig in harder, and we know they will dig in harder. Its beyond the joke now, and the expectations for the next match will be high for a good contest, because now we know both teams are going to show up with their A++ game.

Its getting a bit of momentum. Its been gaining momentum for years. Then, coming on board in the years to come will be Tonga and Samoa, and an English resurgance -- these are like extra characters in a play, some you like, some you loathe, some add spice and some add sparkle. We'll probably start to pay closer attention to them all, and follow their rise and fall over the years like we do with NRL clubs.

There's your international test scene. Its definitely going to heat up. But the day that a test gets 4 million and Origin just 3 or 2, is a while off yet. But the day a test gets 2 million is close at hand and that is worth pursuing. Pinnacle? Yes. But see, technically they could both get 4 million. Its not like they clash at all. Still tests would be the pinnacle, and accepted they were the pinnacle at that.
 
Last edited:

langpark

First Grade
Messages
5,867
The origin games last year were the best 3 games of the season, and that contest won't be matched. Yes International football is improving, never said otherwise, but it is silly to suggest at this stage it has taken over Origin. Whilst I like to see Australia win, it doesn't bother me if we don't. Much prefer my State to win. So long as my players don't get injured in a test match, that is all I care about at this stage.
Are you serious!? All I seem to remember is players being given 3 minutes for each play-the-ball and the little 'scuffles' because no punches are allowed. It was the most boring series I've ever watched.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,101
Are you serious!? All I seem to remember is players being given 3 minutes for each play-the-ball and the little 'scuffles' because no punches are allowed. It was the most boring series I've ever watched.

Game 1 was one of the greatest Origins of all time. Hayne played one of the greatest individual games of all time.

Game 2 and 3 were not the greatest spectacles.

But I think the "Origin is a boring grind" is overdone by sore losers and whiners
 

Von Neumann

Juniors
Messages
157
I don't get how people can bag origin. Still, if you want to talk origin maybe do it in an origin specific thread

Here's a thing: on the roar a test match article got 300 comments. I think some of you are too preoccupied with rubbish and bickering
 
Last edited:

Penrose Warrior

First Grade
Messages
9,616
Game 1 was one of the greatest Origins of all time. Hayne played one of the greatest individual games of all time.

Game 2 and 3 were not the greatest spectacles.

But I think the "Origin is a boring grind" is overdone by sore losers and whiners

Game 2 was the biggest shitfest of all time. It was pathetic. And apparently it was the banning of the biff that caused it! Not you know, the biggest grubs on the face of the earth in blue..

However, why does either have to be the pinnacle? I get it that people get a kick out of comparing stuff but why can't SOO and Tests have their spot and just be happy with that? Both should be important for the good of the game.

If anyone wants to bag out union, that's a different story.
 

eozsmiles

Bench
Messages
3,392
The ANZAC test would have been a better spectacle if the Roos had provided some half way decent competition. ;-)

The test would have been even better if both teams had more than 4 days to prepare, which is the next thing to be considered for test footy. The teams meet on Monday for recovery and media, then get Tuesday Wednesday Thursday to prepare. That's not good enough if we want to see the best players perform at their peak.
 

drake

First Grade
Messages
5,433
What if the only qualifications for Origin were you made your grade debut in NSW or Qld? Let the proud kiwis, poms etc play if they came through a NSW or qld club and let them play for the country they came from.

Obviously players who transfer as established players are ineligible, but we open up the availability of more players.
 

hellteam

First Grade
Messages
6,537
What if the only qualifications for Origin were you made your grade debut in NSW or Qld? Let the proud kiwis, poms etc play if they came through a NSW or qld club and let them play for the country they came from.

Obviously players who transfer as established players are ineligible, but we open up the availability of more players.

No, just no.
 
Top