- Messages
- 152,969
They spent hundreds of millions on future stars, which is why they cost so much in transfer fees.
future stars, or younger players, generally cost less, although Chel$ki do like to over pay for thier target players
They spent hundreds of millions on future stars, which is why they cost so much in transfer fees.
Matildas tonight..
Gonna be tough calls on who isn’t getting a ticket to Paris
I read somewhere that the Matildas are Australia's most loved sporting team, followed by our women's cricket team.
Be good to see them start to get paid more...
Our women's team is so, so good.I watch the womens cricket all the time, except T20 cuz I jut dont like that form of the game, they have so much talent
They are up against a bunch of countries where hardly any women even watch sport, much less play it.Our women's team is so, so good.
Liverpool’s team was older than Chelsea’s. Inexperience is literally the reason Chelsea are struggling. In that cup final Liverpool used 10 players over the age of 24 while Chelsea had only 7. The average age of the sides was 24 vs 23. For the starting 11 it was 25 to 23.
Can only play the team in front of youThey are up against a bunch of countries where hardly any women even watch sport, much less play it.
Right, which is why the Matildas (and the US women) win so much compared to their men’s teams.Can only play the team in front of you
Not disagreeing but that shouldn’t downplay the fact they are comfortably top 10 in the world in the most popular sportRight, which is why the Matildas (and the US women) win so much compared to their men’s teams.