What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Association Football

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
56,044
It's not about soccer, it's about national identity, frustration and fear in an increasingly claustrophobic Europe.

Pretty much.
As you say, cultural history plays a big part. It goes back centuries. That ain't gunna change in a generation. I still have Croat and Serb mates who hate each other. Even after leaving their war torn countries and coming here to a peaceful country. Serb FC and WSC will always hate each other, because it goes beyond local metro demographic grounds.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,717
Sometimes you just have to pick up a chair and smash some merkin in the head to feel alive. Ya know?

Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.
 

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
56,044
Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.

That's pretty funny too.
Unless you know someone who has died from a king hit.
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
The last time before that Pou felt like royalty was when he married his cousin and had an affair in which he sucked the pool boy's toes.
 
Messages
19,393
Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.

Dunno about that, but speaking of Kings, this local Canberra chap seems to be a real shaker and mover (he could be a soccer player, not sure):

Man not guilty of Lonsdale Street Roasters burglary despite soiled underpants found at scene

Clare Colley
Published: June 15, 2016 - 5:04PM

A man has been found not guilty of a Braddon café burglary despite his faeces-soiled underpants being found at the scene.

Wesley Matthew King was accused of breaking into Lonsdale Street Roasters in late December 2014 and stealing $3900 cash, an EFTPOS machine, cash drawer, iPod, and keys to a Jeep from an office safe.

The café's manager discovered the crime when he arrived at the business on January 1 to find it ransacked with diarrhoea-like faeces smeared across papers on the floor next to a pair of stained underpants and the till and EFTPOS machine missing, the court documents said.

DNA evidence taken from the pants' waistband indicated Mr King had worn them before, but the forensic scientist admitted another set of DNA found on the pants made it possible someone else could have worn the unwashed pants more recently.

Police were unable to find the identity of the other person linked to the pants.

Mr King chose not to give evidence during an ACT Supreme Court trial.

In a judgement published on Wednesday, Chief Justice Helen Murrell acknowledged DNA evidence suggested King had worn the pants, but found it wasn't enough to find him guilty of three counts of burglary and one count of theft.

"There is ? a reasonable, albeit small, possibility that the burglar was someone else who was wearing unwashed underpants that had previously been worn by the accused," she said.

"I am not satisfied that guilt is the only available rational inference."

The forensic scientist chose not to take a sample of the faeces for testing as bacteria was likely to degrade DNA with which it comes into contact.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/man-not-guilty-of-lonsdale-street-roasters-burglary-despite-soiled-underpants-found-at-scene-20160615-gpjnsm.html
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
53,065
Just read that story again Barry. That is absolute gold.

Imagine being a lawyer and having to defend shit boy.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
DNA evidence taken from the pants' waistband indicated Mr King had worn them before, but the forensic scientist admitted another set of DNA found on the pants made it possible someone else could have worn the unwashed pants more recently.

Police were unable to find the identity of the other person linked to the pants.
:lol:
Mr King chose not to give evidence during an ACT Supreme Court trial.
I don't blame him...
 

Latest posts

Top