Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 53,065
Freddie Flintoff on the right looks like he wants no part.
It's not about soccer, it's about national identity, frustration and fear in an increasingly claustrophobic Europe.
Sometimes you just have to pick up a chair and smash some merkin in the head to feel alive. Ya know?
Sometimes you just have to pick up a chair and smash some merkin in the head to feel alive. Ya know?
It's even better if it's a broken seat (chair) at Pirtek that you have just ripped out.
#hooligans
:lol:Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.
It's all fun and games unless someone loses an eye.
Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.
Agreed. Also why they should go back to calling the 'coward punch' a king hit. Because nobody ever felt like a coward after smashing some unsuspecting stranger. You feel like f**king royalty.
Man not guilty of Lonsdale Street Roasters burglary despite soiled underpants found at scene
Clare Colley
Published: June 15, 2016 - 5:04PM
A man has been found not guilty of a Braddon café burglary despite his faeces-soiled underpants being found at the scene.
Wesley Matthew King was accused of breaking into Lonsdale Street Roasters in late December 2014 and stealing $3900 cash, an EFTPOS machine, cash drawer, iPod, and keys to a Jeep from an office safe.
The café's manager discovered the crime when he arrived at the business on January 1 to find it ransacked with diarrhoea-like faeces smeared across papers on the floor next to a pair of stained underpants and the till and EFTPOS machine missing, the court documents said.
DNA evidence taken from the pants' waistband indicated Mr King had worn them before, but the forensic scientist admitted another set of DNA found on the pants made it possible someone else could have worn the unwashed pants more recently.
Police were unable to find the identity of the other person linked to the pants.
Mr King chose not to give evidence during an ACT Supreme Court trial.
In a judgement published on Wednesday, Chief Justice Helen Murrell acknowledged DNA evidence suggested King had worn the pants, but found it wasn't enough to find him guilty of three counts of burglary and one count of theft.
"There is ? a reasonable, albeit small, possibility that the burglar was someone else who was wearing unwashed underpants that had previously been worn by the accused," she said.
"I am not satisfied that guilt is the only available rational inference."
The forensic scientist chose not to take a sample of the faeces for testing as bacteria was likely to degrade DNA with which it comes into contact.
Dunno about that, but speaking of Kings, this local Canberra chap seems to be a real shaker and mover (he could be a soccer player, not sure):
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/man-not-guilty-of-lonsdale-street-roasters-burglary-despite-soiled-underpants-found-at-scene-20160615-gpjnsm.html
The last time before that Pou felt like royalty was when he married his cousin and had an affair in which he sucked the pool boy's toes.
:lol:DNA evidence taken from the pants' waistband indicated Mr King had worn them before, but the forensic scientist admitted another set of DNA found on the pants made it possible someone else could have worn the unwashed pants more recently.
Police were unable to find the identity of the other person linked to the pants.
I don't blame him...Mr King chose not to give evidence during an ACT Supreme Court trial.