Folau would still fail based on the following caveats "statements must be made in good faith; not be malicious or harass, vilify or incite hatred against a person or group; not advocate for the commission of a serious criminal offence."
Gender is f**king binary. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with science. Why should people be forced to pretend otherwise? I'll be respectful to someone that identifies as Ze, but sharing my view that gender is binary in a respectful manner is not discrimination. Just as them sharing their views in a respectful manner isn't discrimination against me.
This example is f**king stupid. Assuming an employee was stupid enough to say this and ruin their employers business, the single mother would not be discriminating against them if they said "get f**ked, I am taking my kid elsewhere"
I doubt it. Sounds like a pretty malicious thing to say.
At non-religious school? Unlikely.
I have never in 40 years of my existence ever discussed religion with a f**king retail assistant. This seems like a bullshit example. If it did happen, I would argue that it is malicious and designed to incite hatred.
Pretty easy to ask for one that will.
Shit example. That would be sorted out amongst the hospital. A patient would turn up and be treated by someone just as they are now.
Doctor: "I wont prescribe you a pill but I will get another doctor that will."
Patient: "That's discrimination!".
I don't imagine too many pharmacists would risk jeopardising their business in such a way but if they are stupid enough to do so then it is pretty f**ken easy to go to another pharmacy.
What a crock of shit. We are all going to become pregnant now? Please. Consider this rationally. A hospital would work out which Drs they have on board and ensure that they have coverage should someone need a super critical, super emergency PEP (within 3 f**king days).
I'm struggling to see the problem here. Is the suggestion that by saying such a thing, she is encouraging her to commit suicide? Weird. If that is the inference then there are already protections against psychiatrists encouraging suicide.
Could be, but would it be? I don't think so.
I'm not convinced that many employers will push this too far for fear of being arse f**ked by a large portion of the population
But in practical terms, in the unlikely event that it does happen, how does that impact a potential employee?
Either they miss out on a job because they aren't religious enough, they have to act more religious while at work or they can choose to apply for a completely different job.
I don't see that as discrimination, I see that as someone potentially being a poor fit for an organisation and an employer.
There are many jobs that I will never get because of who I am.
They don't want a satan worshipper on their Board? Fancy that!
What does that mean in real terms and where exactly is the discrimination?
I don't have a problem with this. If I am religious and inviting someone into my home to perform such a critical task where they effectively become part of the family it is reasonable for someone to be able to make that choice.
Would it really happen that way? In 99.99999% of cases it wil be a simple question - Can you work the hours?
This seems to be implying that someone should be compelled to hire a person who can't fulfill the requirements of the job? Thats f**ken daft.
Most of these examples have been f**ken stupid but this takes it to a new level.
More scare tactics. That is a hateful and malicious statement that would be unlikely to get through.
Also, religion aside, a lot of companies have social media policies that prohibit you from saying much about your work place. The above comment would be a clear breach of that.
Why the f**ken f**k would a non jewish person want to go to jewish school? F**k me!
I'd like to think that in virtually every case it would be worked out between the school, kid and parents in a respectful manner.
I just can't honestly see a what a school would have to gain by doing that.
Lets flip this for a minute. The First Church of Satan should be allowed to use the Sydney Anglican Church's campsite to perform a black mass?
F**k off.
If I am applying to live in the home of someone who is deeply religious to the point where they would ask me that I am religious I am running a million f**king miles.
But, given that it is their house I don't begrudge their right to do so even if I think they are weird.
So at this point, you have to ask yourself what rights are actually being denied through enforcing such a rule?
