Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Lol are you going to delete every post that disagrees with you?
He’s a better man than those he put down.
Wasn’t me Einstein.
Well that’s very subjective, isn’t it ?
www.dw.com
www.abc.net.au
Apologise.
wow .... comparing it to a clear act of premeditated, planned terrorism ..... not similar in any way, which is clearly why you somehow thought to link them and mention itWell that’s very subjective, isn’t it ?
In 2015 a chap decided in Parramatta that he didn’t like the quality of a human called Curtis Cheng. Stop there before you accuse me of suggesting these cases are in anyway similar - other than the premise of a personal cause.
View attachment 56191
I told you before, vigilantism isn’t legal and there is a reason for it.
Three men found guilty of murdering Ahmaud Arbery – DW – 11/24/2021
A jury in the US state of Georgia has found three white men guilty of murder in the 2020 killing of Black jogger Ahmaud Arbery. The men had followed Arbery in a truck as he ran though a neighborhood.
Kyles Rittenhouse will no doubt be re-trialed in multiple civil actions [see OJ Simpson wrongful death case]. IMO he will found liable and will be sued for squillions. On the upside for Kyle, the gun lobby and the right of politics will crowd fund his case and he will exit these actions relatively unscathed.
I see you've given up on defending him legally and are now just happy they he played the role of pest exterminator in your dystopian mindset.
But you literally still did it!
Because the premise of a personal cause was the same.
I don’t need to defend him legally.
