OT: Current Affairs and Politics

[Gronk]

They take their shit serious over there.



OK so I googled trying to find a Whitlam or a Johnny Howard Tattoo. The closest I could find was a mad merkin who I hope has covered it up by now with roses or a dragon.

Home – Triple M

www.triplem.com.au

EDIT - we have a winner. Are you f**king kidding me merkin ?

Man shows off his tattoo on his quad of the One Nation leader

The 20-year-old Perth man who doesn't follow politics pledged to get the tattoo (pictured) if a social media post received 110 laughing emojis.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[hineyrulz]

They take their shit serious over there.

View attachment 78610

OK so I googled trying to find a Whitlam or a Johnny Howard Tattoo. The closest I could find was a mad merkin who I hope has covered it up by now with roses or a dragon.

Home – Triple M

www.triplem.com.au

View attachment 78611


EDIT - we have a winner. Are you f**king kidding me merkin ?

View attachment 78612

Man shows off his tattoo on his quad of the One Nation leader

The 20-year-old Perth man who doesn't follow politics pledged to get the tattoo (pictured) if a social media post received 110 laughing emojis.

www.dailymail.co.uk

That definitely is a please explain job.

 

[TheRam]

Love your work Ram.

It's actually not my work. I just listen, watch and read merkins like this guy David Rothkopf

He wrote a book a few years ago called Superclass: How the Rich Ruined Our World

He writes about how there are about 6000 superclass elites that run everything and that it narrows right down to less then 100 with the with the real power. And despite the title he actually comes to the conclusion that it is a good thing and that we should all embrace the new order of things. Hardly surprising though because he is an insider. You know one of those weasel lieutenants that thinks he will get a pass and he might even get a ticket to the bunker.

Also lets not forget the this little study from Switzerland done by scientists back 2011 not believing that the world could be all the conspiracies that the world could be controlled by just a few companies or individuals, so went out to disprove it. But guess what, after 7 years of study they found that it in fact was controlled by a very small group. Around 147 companies control the top 43000 transnational companies of the world. Obviously the list would be slightly out of date today, with the Rothschild BlackRock and Vangard moving to the top of the list displacing the Rothschilds Barclays plc from the number one position. You know the same BlackRock whos CEO Larry Fink tells us all publically that the people of the planet who don't comply with what they want us to do must be encouraged/forced and made uncomfortable enough for them to comply.

The 147 Companies That Control Everything

Visualizing the "super entity." Courtesy: New Scientist Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them...

www.forbes.com

Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them. They built a model of who owns what and what their revenues are and mapped the whole edifice of economic power.

They discovered that global corporate control has a distinct bow-tie shape, with a dominant core of 147 firms radiating out from the middle. Each of these 147 own interlocking stakes of one another and together they control 40% of the wealth in the network. A total of 737 control 80% of it all. The top 20 are at the bottom of the post. This is, say the paper's authors, the first map of the structure of global corporate control.

 

[Gronk]

It's actually not my work. I just listen, watch and read merkins like this guy David Rothkopf

He wrote a book a few years ago called Superclass: How the Rich Ruined Our World
View attachment 78627
He writes about how there are about 6000 superclass elites that run everything and that it narrows right down to less then 100 with the with the real power. And despite the title he actually comes to the conclusion that it is a good thing and that we should all embrace the new order of things. Hardly surprising though because he is an insider. You know one of those weasel lieutenants that thinks he will get a pass and he might even get a ticket to the bunker.

Also lets not forget the this little study from Switzerland done by scientists back 2011 not believing that the world could be all the conspiracies that the world could be controlled by just a few companies or individuals, so went out to disprove it. But guess what, after 7 years of study they found that it in fact was controlled by a very small group. Around 147 companies control the top 43000 transnational companies of the world. Obviously the list would be slightly out of date today, with the Rothschild BlackRock and Vangard moving to the top of the list displacing the Rothschilds Barclays plc from the number one position. You know the same BlackRock whos CEO Larry Fink tells us all publically that the people of the planet who don't comply with what they want us to do must be encouraged/forced and made uncomfortable enough for them to comply.

The 147 Companies That Control Everything

Visualizing the "super entity." Courtesy: New Scientist Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them...

www.forbes.com

Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them. They built a model of who owns what and what their revenues are and mapped the whole edifice of economic power.

They discovered that global corporate control has a distinct bow-tie shape, with a dominant core of 147 firms radiating out from the middle. Each of these 147 own interlocking stakes of one another and together they control 40% of the wealth in the network. A total of 737 control 80% of it all. The top 20 are at the bottom of the post. This is, say the paper's authors, the first map of the structure of global corporate control.

IIRC that Rothkopf chap runs a podcast network. What's it called again ?

 

[TheRam]

Here we go people. At this point they are just getting you used to the idea. Remember forcing electric cars on the world when the technology is so flawed and we are actually destroying way more of the environment to produce them was also considered crazy. But here we are. They'll just keep talking about it, while denying it at the same time and then hey presto, yeah it's here now we need to suck it up and live with it. bugs anyone?

Think this will never happen? Hahahahaha....

14 American Cities Aim to Ban Meat, Dairy, Private Cars by 2030

redstate.com

 

[Bandwagon]

Here we go people. At this point they are just getting you used to the idea. Remember forcing electric cars on the world when the technology is so flawed and we are actually destroying way more of the environment to produce them was also considered crazy. But here we are. They'll just keep talking about it, while denying it at the same time and then hey presto, yeah it's here now we need to suck it up and live with it. bugs anyone?

Think this will never happen? Hahahahaha....

14 American Cities Aim to Ban Meat, Dairy, Private Cars by 2030

redstate.com

Yeah, it aint happening because that's just a shit take on what C40 is on about. Website should be called RedMeat, cause that's what it's throwing it's dufus readers.

 

[TheRam]

Yeah, it aint happening because that's just a shit take on what C40 is on about. Website should be called RedMeat, cause that's what it's throwing it's dufus readers.

Yeah sure that's what people like you kept saying when people were waning us about the trans movement being what it is today or getting rid of all gas appliances or the combustion engine or euthanasia for poor people(see Canada) or abortions after delivery, or 15 minute cities or normalising pedophilia or...should I keep going on?

Actually I won't bother replying to brain dead individuals such as yourself anymore. I can't be bothered to debate with lost souls like you. You are way to gone. My post are for people that still have some capacity to think for themselves and do a little bit of critical thinking.

Good luck to you.

 

[Suitman]

It really didn't take the STATE Labor Party long to go back to their old ways.
It's not only the waste of funds, but the choosing of a candidate that the actual recruitment agency recommended was highly unsuitable.
It's time for Haylen (The puppet of the RTBU) to go, just months into the job.

Premier admits taxpayer funds were wasted on Transport secretary recruitment
NSW Premier says the state government shouldn’t have forked out $125,000 on the recruitment of Josh Murray as the new Transport secretary in NSW.

William Tyson

Daily Telegraph, August 28, 2023 - 11:45AM
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/n.../a1f4f5d11200077bdb5e579e73a87951#share-tools
NSW Premier Chris Minns admits the state government shouldn’t have forked out $125,000 of taxpayer funds on a recruitment process that saw former Labor staffer Josh Murray appointed as the new Transport secretary in NSW.

The appointment attracted widespread criticism after government documents tabled to parliament revealed Transport Minister Jo Haylen chose Mr Murray to be her department’s secretary despite an independent evaluation panel finding that he was not the best candidate for the $588,250 per-year job.
It was also revealed Mr Murray spoke to Ms Haylen’s chief of staff Scott Gartrell about the recruitment process before he got the job of Transport for NSW secretary.
“We don’t want to waste any money, any public money when it comes to recruitment of any official and it’s important that we get the right people for the jobs,” Minns said to Ben Fordham on 2GB on Monday.
“In this context, it’s important to lay out the reason for that independent process was to see who will apply from around the world from other jurisdictions, who was running rail operations for example.”

When asked by Fordham if the $125,000 put into the recruitment process was “a waste of money”, Minns conceded and agreed.
“Well given that Mr Murray was appointed to the job obviously we wanted to make sure that we don’t spend that money when we don’t need to,” he said.
“In retrospect it wasn’t required, that’s correct.
“If you know who you want for the position we want to make sure we’re in a position where we can appoint those senior public servants for those difficult jobs.”
Earlier this month Ms Haylen denied accusations she lied about how the state’s Transport boss was recruited.
She said her chief of staff Scott Gartrell “did not tell the independent panel who to interview”.

But the bombshell government documents revealed Mr Gartrell said “Josh Murray should be interviewed” for the $588,250 job as Transport for NSW Secretary.

Ms Haylen said Mr Gartrell “was asked for input … on an initial list of candidates”.
Opposition roads spokeswoman Natalie Ward accused Ms Haylen of telling a “blatant lie”. “Every time the minister opens her mouth the story changes,” Ms Ward said.
“Her statement today that her chief of staff did not tell the panel who to interview is a blatant lie.” Ms Haylen said her chief of staff was “making a suggestion” on who should be interviewed for the job but “it was not up to him”.

 

[Incorrect]

And to top it all off, it has also emerged that Murray and his wife made political donations to Haylen's election campaign... Lol

Haylen should resign now and Murray should step aside. This is disgraceful

 

[Bandwagon]

Yeah sure that's what people like you kept saying when people were waning us about the trans movement being what it is today or getting rid of all gas appliances or the combustion engine or euthanasia for poor people(see Canada) or abortions after delivery, or 15 minute cities or normalising pedophilia or...should I keep going on?

Actually I won't bother replying to brain dead individuals such as yourself anymore. I can't be bothered to debate with lost souls like you. You are way to gone. My post are for people that still have some capacity to think for themselves and do a little bit of critical thinking.

Good luck to you.

Yeah ok mate, I get it, you don't like your dumb shitf**kery challenged.

But f**k it, you can't always get what you want.

Let's start with this eh?

The headline for the article you posted.............

14 American Cities Aim to Ban Meat, Dairy, Private Cars by 2030​

Now, from that article the link to the story that makes that claim, which the then repeat...

These 14 US Cities Have A 'Target' Of Banning Meat By 2030

Fourteen major American cities are part of a globalist climate organization with an 'ambitious target' of banning meat and dairy by 2030.

thefederalist.com

.......and here's the claim............

Fourteen major American cities are part of a globalist climate organization known as the “C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group,” which has an “ambitious target” by the year 2030 of “0 kg [of] meat consumption,” “0 kg [of] dairy consumption,” “3 new clothing items per person per year,” “0 private vehicles” owned, and “1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.”

...............hmm, note the wording doesn't quite align with the headline, it's close, but it isn't the same is it.

Here's the link to document they quote......

https://expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Arup-C40-The-Future-of-Urban-Consumption-in-a-1-5C-World.pdf

I'll save you the time of going through the whole thing, I mean simply linking to a 132 page document their idiot readers aint gonna sift through to see if their being lied to is pretty typical of this kind of shit, obviously you didn't bother, elsewise you'd understand you're being lied to.

So it's chapter 6, page 66 ( oooh the number of the beast! ) It clearly states this is scenarios that are modeled under targets, and yes the zero cars and zero meat is modeled, and labelled as "ambitious targets", but here's the kicker, as going back to the difference between the headline claim, and the attempted inference in the text....

1: There is no evidence shown that these are targets that have been adopted by the organisation.

2: There is no evidence shown that the cities mentioned have signed on to these targets.

3: And most importantly, nowhere in the entire document does it discuss "banning" the things the article claims these cities are aiming to ban.

So to summarise, there is literally nothing presented to support the claim being made beyond inference and innuendo, but that's all it takes for plebs who want to believe what they claim to be true.

Debate that shit mate.

Or if you prefer, run run run like a pussy.

 

[Suitman]

And to top it all off, it has also emerged that Murray and his wife made political donations to Haylen's election campaign... Lol

Haylen should resign now and Murray should step aside. This is disgraceful

Just 5 months in and they are doing exactly the same thing they accused the Libs of doing with Barrilaro, which was also disgraceful.
Politics f**king sucks.

 

[Gary Gutful]

It's actually not my work. I just listen, watch and read merkins like this guy David Rothkopf

He wrote a book a few years ago called Superclass: How the Rich Ruined Our World
View attachment 78627
He writes about how there are about 6000 superclass elites that run everything and that it narrows right down to less then 100 with the with the real power. And despite the title he actually comes to the conclusion that it is a good thing and that we should all embrace the new order of things. Hardly surprising though because he is an insider. You know one of those weasel lieutenants that thinks he will get a pass and he might even get a ticket to the bunker.

Also lets not forget the this little study from Switzerland done by scientists back 2011 not believing that the world could be all the conspiracies that the world could be controlled by just a few companies or individuals, so went out to disprove it. But guess what, after 7 years of study they found that it in fact was controlled by a very small group. Around 147 companies control the top 43000 transnational companies of the world. Obviously the list would be slightly out of date today, with the Rothschild BlackRock and Vangard moving to the top of the list displacing the Rothschilds Barclays plc from the number one position. You know the same BlackRock whos CEO Larry Fink tells us all publically that the people of the planet who don't comply with what they want us to do must be encouraged/forced and made uncomfortable enough for them to comply.

The 147 Companies That Control Everything

Visualizing the "super entity." Courtesy: New Scientist Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them...

www.forbes.com

Three systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich have taken a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide and analyzed all 43,060 transnational corporations and share ownerships linking them. They built a model of who owns what and what their revenues are and mapped the whole edifice of economic power.

They discovered that global corporate control has a distinct bow-tie shape, with a dominant core of 147 firms radiating out from the middle. Each of these 147 own interlocking stakes of one another and together they control 40% of the wealth in the network. A total of 737 control 80% of it all. The top 20 are at the bottom of the post. This is, say the paper's authors, the first map of the structure of global corporate control.

Quality material.

 

[Gronk]

Yeah sure that's what people like you kept saying when people were waning us about the trans movement being what it is today or getting rid of all gas appliances or the combustion engine or euthanasia for poor people(see Canada) or abortions after delivery, or 15 minute cities or normalising pedophilia or...should I keep going on?

Actually I won't bother replying to brain dead individuals such as yourself anymore. I can't be bothered to debate with lost souls like you. You are way to gone. My post are for people that still have some capacity to think for themselves and do a little bit of critical thinking.

Good luck to you.

But you don’t debate. Anyway Gloria from ChatGPT recommends this cause of action:

If you are involved in a person suffering narcissistic injury, perhaps the best thing you can do is learn to step back and observe the person with narcissism with objective curiosity, making silent statements to yourself such as, “Wow, how interesting that this person is going completely ballistic over something so miniscule,” or, “Hmm, it’s a shame we can’t have a healthy conversation or resolve problems together,” then simply excuse yourself and go on with your day.

 

[Gronk]

 

[TheRam]

Check this guy out Dennis Meadows. Who is Dennis Meadows you may ask? Well he is a co-author of The Club Of Rome's 'The Limits To Growth' that Malthusian nonsense of around 200 years ago that never came true that the elites jumped on and backed ever since. Sound familiar? Climate Change anyone? If you don't know what the Club Of Rome is, well I'll leave it up to you to look it up and see exactly how influential it is. But well worth watching and seeing what they are planning for us all. I expect Gronk to dismiss this guy as not relevant or whatever, but he is who he is and he isn't a nobody like Gronk always tries to make out when the message is a little to disturbing or real.

There are 4 parts, this is the first.

 

[bazza]

I wish it was a 40 part series

 

[hindy111]

 

[TheRam]

Check out how Sir Jeffery Archer is a little taken aback and lamenting the capabilities of ChatGTP when it creates what it took him 40 years of practice and experience in just a few seconds.

Now remember this is with a poxy little AI that they have given the public for free. Imagine what all the different globalist think tanks and governmental departments(agencies, military) are doing with the wiz bang super AI systems at their disposal?

All the endless gaming scenarios that they are studying and figuring out how to control us and make sure that we never really threaten them while they take us back to a technocratic neo-feudalistic world with the population reduction down to around 500m that they keep telling us about but very few actually believe them.

Just like how Alex Jones about two weeks ago told the world that they are planning to bring back covid restrictions like wearing masks again and all the other things that go along with it by Sep 15. Immediately MSM went on the offensive and started to report that he is a kook and that it wasn't true and not to believe the conspiracy nut. But literally at the same time the MSM started to report that covid was coming back and restrictions will be needed to stop the spread from happening again. It ended up becoming the number 1 internet story on the net that week but still they deny while promoting the coming restrictions.

Same thing on all that they do, including the 14 city meat ban. Report and deny it is happening, while plans are under foot to make it happen. It is a tactic of preparing your victim/public and by the time it is ready to implement the public are now ready to comply with little resistance. I'm sure the AI has this as part of the game plan even though it is an old tactic that has been around for ever.

When people that hate you tell you they want to eliminate you because there are to many of you, you should believe them.

 

[Gronk]

I expect Gronk to dismiss this guy as not relevant or whatever, but he is who he is and he isn't a nobody like Gronk always tries to make out when the message is a little to disturbing or real.

Told you before, if you need to include an insult in your posts then you're not at all confident for them to stand on their own merits.

Perhaps you'll listen to Gloria from ChatGPT. She seems friendly and often it's easier to hear the message from a third person.

Including a condescending reference or insult in a statement can be driven by several underlying motivations, but it's generally not a constructive or respectful way to engage in communication. Here are some possible reasons why someone might do this:

1. Insecurity: People who feel insecure or threatened by others may resort to condescension or insults as a way to protect their own ego. By putting others down, they may temporarily feel a boost in self-esteem.
2. Defensiveness: When someone's views or beliefs are challenged, they might respond defensively by resorting to insults. This can be a way to deflect criticism and avoid engaging in a thoughtful, rational discussion.
3. Lack of Communication Skills: Some individuals may not possess effective communication skills or the ability to articulate their thoughts and opinions clearly. In such cases, they may use insults as a crutch to compensate for their communication deficiencies.
4. Misperceived Superiority: People who believe they are intellectually or morally superior to others may use condescension as a way to assert their perceived dominance or superiority in a conversation.
5. Emotional Regulation Issues: In certain cases, individuals who struggle with regulating their emotions may lash out with insults when they feel frustrated, angry, or upset. This can be an impulsive reaction rather than a calculated choice.
6. Manipulation: Some individuals may use insults or condescension as a manipulative tactic to control or dominate a conversation, making it difficult for others to challenge their ideas or viewpoints.
7. Group Dynamics: In group settings, individuals may use insults to gain approval or validation from their peers. It can be a way to solidify one's position within a social group or community.
8. Ignorance: Some people may genuinely believe that their condescending comments are valid criticisms or witty remarks, not realizing the harm they cause or the counterproductive nature of their behavior.

It's important to note that using insults and condescension in communication is generally detrimental to productive discourse and can harm relationships. It often leads to defensiveness, further insults, and a breakdown in communication rather than a constructive exchange of ideas.

When faced with such behavior, it's often best to respond calmly and assertively, focusing on the substance of the conversation rather than engaging with the insults themselves. This approach can help steer the discussion toward a more respectful and productive direction.

 

[Gronk]

For those playing at home, AI generated this influencer recently. So hereinafter, she shall be known as Gloria.

I’m an AI influencer: Followers crave my sexy snaps — but I don’t exist

Milla Sofia’s sultry photos on Twitter and TikTok are racking up thousands of likes from deluded social media users.

nypost.com