What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,896
Told you before, if you need to include an insult in your posts then you're not at all confident for them to stand on their own merits.

Perhaps you'll listen to Gloria from ChatGPT. She seems friendly and often it's easier to hear the message from a third person.

Including a condescending reference or insult in a statement can be driven by several underlying motivations, but it's generally not a constructive or respectful way to engage in communication. Here are some possible reasons why someone might do this:
  1. Insecurity: People who feel insecure or threatened by others may resort to condescension or insults as a way to protect their own ego. By putting others down, they may temporarily feel a boost in self-esteem.
  2. Defensiveness: When someone's views or beliefs are challenged, they might respond defensively by resorting to insults. This can be a way to deflect criticism and avoid engaging in a thoughtful, rational discussion.
  3. Lack of Communication Skills: Some individuals may not possess effective communication skills or the ability to articulate their thoughts and opinions clearly. In such cases, they may use insults as a crutch to compensate for their communication deficiencies.
  4. Misperceived Superiority: People who believe they are intellectually or morally superior to others may use condescension as a way to assert their perceived dominance or superiority in a conversation.
  5. Emotional Regulation Issues: In certain cases, individuals who struggle with regulating their emotions may lash out with insults when they feel frustrated, angry, or upset. This can be an impulsive reaction rather than a calculated choice.
  6. Manipulation: Some individuals may use insults or condescension as a manipulative tactic to control or dominate a conversation, making it difficult for others to challenge their ideas or viewpoints.
  7. Group Dynamics: In group settings, individuals may use insults to gain approval or validation from their peers. It can be a way to solidify one's position within a social group or community.
  8. Ignorance: Some people may genuinely believe that their condescending comments are valid criticisms or witty remarks, not realizing the harm they cause or the counterproductive nature of their behavior.
It's important to note that using insults and condescension in communication is generally detrimental to productive discourse and can harm relationships. It often leads to defensiveness, further insults, and a breakdown in communication rather than a constructive exchange of ideas.

When faced with such behavior, it's often best to respond calmly and assertively, focusing on the substance of the conversation rather than engaging with the insults themselves. This approach can help steer the discussion toward a more respectful and productive direction.

9. Dislike Of What The Other Represents: Frustration at the dumb arses flagrant Marxist leftist brainwashed dirbble.
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,896
Shown to be bullshit.

Why repeat proven lies that you couldn't even bring yourself to defend?

I don't need to defend something that they have been pushing now for over a decade as something that is necessary to stop climate change and reduce man and animals carbon foot print. Where have you been? Holidaying on the moon?

Shown to be bullshit?

Like I said they tell you then they tell you they aren't doing it. Then they tell you oh by the way, it's here and it is vitally necessary and there is nothing you can do about it.

Wake up man! It's the same play book over and over again. How gullible are you? Wake up! snap out of it!
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
44,928
9. Dislike Of What The Other Represents: Frustration at the dumb arses flagrant Marxist leftist brainwashed dirbble.

This is funny as f**k, you fling around the term "marxism" blissfully unaware that much of that which you've posted over the last coupla days is far more closely related to marxism than any of the liberal ideology to which you attribute that label.

You clearly only understand it as a buzzword, nothing more.
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
44,928
I don't need to defend something that they have been pushing now for over a decade as something that is necessary to stop climate change and reduce man and animals carbon foot print. Where have you been? Holidaying on the moon?

Shown to be bullshit?

Like I said they tell you then they tell you they aren't doing it. Then they tell you oh by the way, it's here and it is vitally necessary and there is nothing you can do about it.

Wake up man! It's the same play book over and over again. How gullible are you? Wake up! snap out of it!

Yet again, nothing but supposition, you simply choose to believe a blatant lie. I've demonstrated the lie, you have failed to address the points made, because you simply can't.

Stamping your feet and attempting to assert superiority is pointlessly unconvincing, and intellectually lazy.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,970
Yet again, nothing but supposition, you simply choose to believe a blatant lie. I've demonstrated the lie, you have failed to address the points made, because you simply can't.

Stamping your feet and attempting to assert superiority is pointlessly unconvincing, and intellectually lazy.
Come on @TheRam. Don’t put up with this shit. prove him wrong!
 

bazza

Immortal
Messages
30,878
Check out how Sir Jeffery Archer is a little taken aback and lamenting the capabilities of ChatGTP when it creates what it took him 40 years of practice and experience in just a few seconds.

Now remember this is with a poxy little AI that they have given the public for free. Imagine what all the different globalist think tanks and governmental departments(agencies, military) are doing with the wiz bang super AI systems at their disposal?

All the endless gaming scenarios that they are studying and figuring out how to control us and make sure that we never really threaten them while they take us back to a technocratic neo-feudalistic world with the population reduction down to around 500m that they keep telling us about but very few actually believe them.

Just like how Alex Jones about two weeks ago told the world that they are planning to bring back covid restrictions like wearing masks again and all the other things that go along with it by Sep 15. Immediately MSM went on the offensive and started to report that he is a kook and that it wasn't true and not to believe the conspiracy nut. But literally at the same time the MSM started to report that covid was coming back and restrictions will be needed to stop the spread from happening again. It ended up becoming the number 1 internet story on the net that week but still they deny while promoting the coming restrictions.

Same thing on all that they do, including the 14 city meat ban. Report and deny it is happening, while plans are under foot to make it happen. It is a tactic of preparing your victim/public and by the time it is ready to implement the public are now ready to comply with little resistance. I'm sure the AI has this as part of the game plan even though it is an old tactic that has been around for ever.

When people that hate you tell you they want to eliminate you because there are to many of you, you should believe them.

It makes me feel special knowing that the globalist elites spend all their time and resources working out ways to control me
 
Messages
11,803
Nah... just getting a pictorial post in, pre-empting tomorrow's referendum date announcement.

Australia’s history begins with 65,000 years of continuous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural connection to this great land. Yet our now 122-year-old Constitution still doesn’t recognise that - the national referendum is our chance to fix this. Vote Yes for Indigenous constitutional recognition and a Voice.
 
Last edited:

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,896
Yet again, nothing but supposition, you simply choose to believe a blatant lie. I've demonstrated the lie, you have failed to address the points made, because you simply can't.

Stamping your feet and attempting to assert superiority is pointlessly unconvincing, and intellectually lazy.
So these guys aren't or haven't run these little ideas up the flag pole?

Climate activists are also advocating for “climate lockdowns,” in the same way there were Covid lockdowns. Ideas floated for a climate lockdown have ranged from shuttering people in their homes and restricting air travel to providing a Universal Basic Income and introducing a maximum income level.

Climate dystopianism doesn’t end there. WEF-linked “bioethicist” Dr. Matthew Liao has proposed the idea of scientists genetically modify humans to be allergic to meat. Liao has also discussed shrinking the physical size of humans via eugenics or hormone injections so they consume fewer resources.

***************************************************************************************

You know what I can't be bothered. It is like arguing with people like this below. It doesn't matter what I say or present, unless it affects you personally it is all nonsense and conspiracy theories to people like you. Honestly if you can't see what C40 and people like Bloomberg are doing then sorry your way to gone and can't be reached.

 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
9. Dislike Of What The Other Represents: Frustration at the dumb arses flagrant Marxist leftist brainwashed dirbble.
So throwing lines like Marxism around, seems to be commonplace these days by anyone on the right who wants to label the politics of the left.

Both you and I know that nobody with a brain wants true socialism like Bolivia or Venezuela attempted. What you guys squirm about is the democratic socialism model if the nordic countries. Countries like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland are often cited as examples of social democracy, which is a blend of capitalist and socialist principles. They have extensive social welfare systems and strong worker protections. They are the cool kids.

So you can slur all you like with your labels, but know this merkin, I’m prolly closer to Richard than Karl Marx (only less cool I suspect).

I worry about you dude, you seem to be living on the edge of your seat, waiting for the end.

IMG_1026.jpeg
 

TheRam

Coach
Messages
13,896
For the people that do want to know what they(global elite) have planed for us down the road, here are some exerts of an interview for you to ponder. The whole interview is mind blowing and shows how much they just don't get(or do they) what all this will eventually and definitely lead to. In the interview these modifications will be optional, but we know that they won't stay that way for too long once they're up and running. Their excuse for everything they do will be in the name of climate change and or another possible pandemic. Which if you believe you deserve what you get.


What are the various ways humans could be engineered to be smaller?

Liao:
There are a couple of ways, actually. You might try to do it through a technique called preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which is already used in IVF settings in fertility clinics today. In this scenario you'd be looking to select which embryos to implant based on height.

Another way to affect height is to use a hormone treatment to trigger the closing of the epiphyseal plate earlier than normal---this sometimes happens by accident in vitamin overdose cases. In fact hormone treatments are already used for height reduction in overly tall children. A final way you could do this is by way of gene imprinting, by influencing the competition between maternal and paternal genes, where there is a height disparity between the mother and father. You could have drugs that reduce or increase the expression of paternal or maternal genes in order to affect birth height.

Isn't it ethically problematic to allow parents to make these kinds of irreversible choices for their children?

Liao:
That's a really good question. First, I think it's useful to distinguish between selection and modification. With selection you don't really have the issue of irreversible choices because the embryo selected can't complain that she could have been otherwise---if the parents had selected a different embryo, she wouldn't have existed at all. In the case of modification, that issue could certainly arise, but even then I think it's important to step back and ask why we are looking at these solutions in the first place. The reason we are even considering these solutions is to prevent climate change, which is a really serious problem, and which might affect the well being of millions of people including the child. And so in that context, if on balance human engineering is going to promote the well being of that particular child, then you might be able to justify the solution to the child.
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
44,928
So these guys aren't or haven't run these little ideas up the flag pole?

That's the whole point mate, they (c40) have run the idea up the flagpole, not the "ban" as claimed, but the effect. It's right there in their document, they aren't hiding that.

And then what your article does there is extrapolate that into these 14 cities aim to impose a ban.

IE - C40 models target - ergo C40 adopts this target - these cities are part of C40 - ergo they adopt this target - oh by the way they're gonna do it by banning shit even though the 130 odd page document we linked to as "proof" of all this, despite the document not saying anything of the sort.

So here you show in asking that question how ready and willing you are to buy into the lie, because you quite obviously believe that in "running an Idea up the flagpole" that translates to them aiming to achieve that idea through force of law.

All you dumb f**ks are the same, you seize on tidbits, regardless of context, completely ignore any evidence that refutes your suppositions, then extrapolate that out to fit into your grand theories of evil doing.

Then when challenged you bury your head in the sand and rave on about how every merkin that challenges your f**kwittery needs to wake up to your so called truths.

Yet again though, when challenged specifically on a claim, rather than provide evidence to back up that claim, you throw in a whole heap of other claims to attempt to deflect from the fact that you have no evidence to support that which is challenged. Just as you have done above.

Hundreds of words in reply, yet not one fact presented to support the claim I've pulled you up on. It's quite telling mate.
 

Latest posts

Top