What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

Joshuatheeel

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,152
That new US defence secretary Hegseth, is like appointing an ex Thirroul butcher player with 150 country first grade games to his name (after playing some flegg games), followed by 3 years as the clubs president, who also has a league podcast, while never having a job managing more than 5 or so employees.....to the Chair and CEO of the NRL....

Take away his views.....yeah he has experience in the field, but nothing like what is required .....
 
Poupou Escobar

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,047
Too much military experience might make it difficult to reform the US military, which is what they want to do. Some merkin who loves it the way it is probably won't be motivated to change it too much.
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,398
Poupou Escobar said:
Too much military experience might make it difficult to reform the US military, which is what they want to do. Some merkin who loves it the way it is probably won't be motivated to change it too much.
Click to expand...
Secretary of Defence not only ensures that the forces are functional but plays an advisory role on hot operational and strategic matters to both the president and allies.

Won’t he be a hoot at the table when the world big dogs meet ?

1731613291532.jpeg
 
strider

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,970
Our Chief of Defence is the top serving military person .... its not even that dude anymore.

I would imagine the equivalent of that is the US chiefs of each of their military.

So i think that leave us with our equivalent being General Richard Marles .... or whatever random minister gets appointed at the time.
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,398
strider said:
Our Chief of Defence is the top serving military person .... its not even that dude anymore.

I would imagine the equivalent of that is the US chiefs of each of their military.

So i think that leave us with our equivalent being General Richard Marles .... or whatever random minister gets appointed at the time.
Click to expand...
The difference here vs there is that POTUS appoints anyone he likes, civilians or congressman, subject to the approval of the floor.

Below POTUS, the guy in charge over there is the Secretary of Defence.
 
strider

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,970
Gronk said:
The difference here vs there is that POTUS appoints anyone he likes, civilians or congressman, subject to the approval of the floor.

Below POTUS, the guy in charge over there is the Secretary of Defence.
Click to expand...
Yes i understand that. And the dude he appointed may be a dud. In all likelihood he will probably have a falling out and resign lol ... though maybe if he is not the standard establishment cuck he and Trump might get along better.

But at the end of the day, he isnt solely going to be making military decisions. Just like our Ministers for whatever dont solely make decisions. ... He has some power to make things shit, but thats no different to our govts and their ministers making things shit.
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,398
strider said:
Yes i understand that. And the dude he appointed may be a dud. In all likelihood he will probably have a falling out and resign lol ... though maybe if he is not the standard establishment cuck he and Trump might get along better.

But at the end of the day, he isnt solely going to be making military decisions. Just like our Ministers for whatever dont solely make decisions. ... He has some power to make things shit, but thats no different to our govts and their ministers making things shit.
Click to expand...
You've kinda white-washed the situation. The facts are that Trump appoints loyalists and actual merit is very low on the need list.

I assume inexperienced loyalist is the opposite of job-ready establishment career cucks aka ooga booga deep state aka people that might say NO ?
 
T.S Quint

T.S Quint

Coach
Messages
14,445
King-Gutho94 said:
This country is getting weak minded to these absolute f**kwits and given them so much power.
Click to expand...

State Premier Jacinta Allan, on X, fired a broadside earlier at the protesters earlier this morning, saying "we are all a bit sick of this stuff".
"Blocking the Christmas windows won't change a thing in the Middle East, but it will let down a bunch of kids in Melbourne. Who does that help?" she wrote.
"People have a right to demonstrate, no one has a right to divide.
"We cannot let ugly protests ruin a beautiful Christmas tradition, and we cannot let violence, division and vilification ruin what makes Victoria great."
Click to expand...

The Victorian Premier doesn't sound weak-minded to me.
What power is she giving them?
 
strider

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,970
Gronk said:
You've kinda white-washed the situation. The facts are that Trump appoints loyalists and actual merit is very low on the need list.

I assume inexperienced loyalist is the opposite of job-ready establishment career cucks aka ooga booga deep state aka people that might say NO ?
Click to expand...
And you just whinge cos, "Trump"

Im happy to accept the people he appoints might turn out crap. But also believe others in the past also do crap things. Is he gonna be good or bad - I dont know and neither do you. And probably neither do all the people who are just flat out anti trump no matter what.

Im pointing out, people in similar positions around the world are not all ex decorated generals. This guy at least has more military experience than our appointed counterpart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top