He needs to blitz it week in week out like Slater and Snake to get that gig. He's failed to display that kind of form over the years, so he has to be content with the wing gig.
Not sure that's an accurate representation of reality?
a) Every looks like a beaten mug in a team that wins 12 games over 2 seasons. Hayne happens to be the only reason we won 10 of those games, and a massive factor in many close losses for us.
b) Slater plays for Qld, so Hayne doesn't have to do anything like him to win the NSW fullback gig.
c) Snake cannot win a game off his own bat - he needs someone to set him up. Considering the options in the halves for NSW are awful (as they have been for the last 3 years), what we need is an intuitive coach who can construct a gameplan around NSW's most dangerous player (Hayne).
d) every time Hayne plays with 'quality' team mates (ie, for NSW) he's in the picture for the man of the match award. 2 + 2 does equal 4, and so anyone with even a smidgen of sense might determine that since we don't have halves who can create points, the best bet is to structure the team around Hayne.
Snake is a really good player, and if we had dynamic halves of course we fit both he and Hayne in the team (and since Hayne can play wing where Snake can't, then that's the logical option). Since we have plodders in the halves, we need the better player at fullback.
If you can't see this, then you probably can't fathom why we lose every year, and foolishly think we're a chance at winning this years Origin without Hayne at FB. It can't happen.
