Birdee_Num_Num
Bench
- Messages
- 4,429
That's offensive stake take that backBut will they be called out on it
That's offensive stake take that backBut will they be called out on it
I think it’s offensive to give them these token games that mean nothing. If it’s development then I’m sorry but 2 games out of 192 or whatever it is can be described as pissing into the wind.
Not offended.
Stating facts and asking the question.
Highly doubt they'd keep pace aerobically on the quicker games.
Or be anywhere near the faster guys in the competition caught on the break to be anywhere near the position required to adjudicate.
Am I wrong or is that a fair question to ask?
If you can't ref the entire spectrum of games then you shouldn't get the call up. IMO.
They'd be run off their feet.How many refs can "keep up" with the speed of the fastest players in the game? I can't actually imagine that it would be a huge difference given the relatively small distance they'd usually be covering. If you're talking about fitness then I can't see why any fit woman couldn't keep up with the aerobic requirements. It's not that hard if you're not tackling.
Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t they already done first grade matches? Additionally how does it help them develop if they are about to go into off-season. They aren’t getting any younger. They can either do it from round 1 or not.Isn't this the ideal (and probably usual?) Way to introduce a new ref?
A fair question indeedNot offended.
Stating facts and asking the question.
Highly doubt they'd keep pace aerobically on the quicker games.
Or be anywhere near the faster guys in the competition caught on the break to be anywhere near the position required to adjudicate.
Am I wrong or is that a fair question to ask?
If you can't ref the entire spectrum of games then you shouldn't get the call up. IMO.
It's like they would try a rule change last round when teams can't make finals.Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t they already done first grade matches? Additionally how does it help them develop if they are about to go into off-season. They aren’t getting any younger. They can either do it from round 1 or not.
They should have been given Soo3 it was a dead rubberIsn't this the ideal (and probably usual?) Way to introduce a new ref?
And making certain rules black and white is disgraceful.The problem with that is you then get the likes of Gus and Joey mouthing off at every opportunity about how pedantic the refs are, and that they should just get out of the way and let the players play.
Then eventually the refs buckle and we’re back to square one.
I think only under the two ref system.Correct me if I’m wrong but haven’t they already done first grade matches? Additionally how does it help them develop if they are about to go into off-season. They aren’t getting any younger. They can either do it from round 1 or not.
Badger has the Dogs, that will help them, won't have to get back 10.I think only under the two ref system.
Not on their own.
Seen Badger do a NSW Cup game.
She screeched all game, blew the pea out of the whistle and was heavily influenced by the crowd.
If that’s what you want during a football game then you‘re a weird cat.
Belinda Sharpe couldn’t even keep up running the line as a touchie.
I bet I know what Nicho thinks of her getting a gig as a ref.
They'd be run off their feet.
Let's give them the penrith vs broncos gf this year then. Likely to be a very fast game that one.
Love or hate some of the male referees as we do.
Aerobically very fit and cover a lot of ground.
I guess that's why males run their own times in a marathons and long distance races as do females.
Athletic performance and output completely different.
So how do you blood a new referee regardless of genitals?I think it’s offensive to give them these token games that mean nothing. If it’s development then I’m sorry but 2 games out of 192 or whatever it is can be described as pissing into the wind.
This way but at the start of the season. What first grade games do the girls get to ref next week? It’s a token effort “giving them a go”.So how do you blood a new referee regardless of genitals?
Meaningless games seems the platform to me.
How does one blood a referee with a penis?
It's a closed debate.A game of semi-good female touch football would still move quicker.
Female ultra marathon runners do quite well against men actually.
I get the point you’re making, and whilst I agree refs in the NRL need to be fit and relatively quick, they don’t need to be ultra marathon fit, and they don’t need to be matching the players over 100m (they usually have at least a 10m start on them), so I don’t see their fitness or speed really being an issue.It's a closed debate.
In all levels of running men out strip women.
Average run times and fastest records, none are held by women over men.
At high performance output women don't compete against men. It's called genetics.
Lets start round 1 with Casey in the top flight of referees. All 27 rounds and finals, origin, and any international duties at the end of the season if required. Any games, no bars held.
If she can't handle that load, what's the point of giving pissy nothing games at the end of the year when those sides are on mad Monday in their head and no one gaf?
It's tokenism. Look at us look how great we are.
Women are represented right across the game, well included. Grass roots mums are all over the joint helping local sides as well as through the higher levels of grade footy.
Why do we need to play the card woman can do what men can do when genetics says they can't?
I go back to an earlier point, why do the women get an all female footy show when the blokes get ripped for lack of diversity?
Seems a bit hypocritical right? Fair and valid statements and nothing to do with being sexist or misogynistic for the outrage brigade.
It's a closed debate.
In all levels of running men out strip women.
Average run times and fastest records, none are held by women over men.
At high performance output women don't compete against men. It's called genetics.
Lets start round 1 with Casey in the top flight of referees. All 27 rounds and finals, origin, and any international duties at the end of the season if required. Any games, no bars held.
If she can't handle that load, what's the point of giving pissy nothing games at the end of the year when those sides are on mad Monday in their head and no one gaf?
It's tokenism. Look at us look how great we are.
Women are represented right across the game, well included. Grass roots mums are all over the joint helping local sides as well as through the higher levels of grade footy.
Why do we need to play the card woman can do what men can do when genetics says they can't?
I go back to an earlier point, why do the women get an all female footy show when the blokes get ripped for lack of diversity?
Seems a bit hypocritical right? Fair and valid statements and nothing to do with being sexist or misogynistic for the outrage brigade.