Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,281
They needed the sharks to have no line speed at all though to get in position for those kicks.
That is what I said about the game at Penrith. No backrowers mean't they could kick those kicks for tries
They needed the sharks to have no line speed at all though to get in position for those kicks.
The dream would be playing Newie but I suspect it will be Cowboys.Yes.
That is what I said about the game at Penrith. No backrowers mean't they could kick those kicks for tries
You weren't wrong. The sharks game was your theory being peer reviewed.
line speed is key. Pressure the halves and they get a kick away at 80% it takes brillance or a mistake to score.
May fluke 1 but not multiple and we won't let 20 points in
Neither of these teams will beat the Storm in a prelim.
No this is Manly's level. They aren't a good sideGood game. Manly are nowhere near there best but it's a 4 point game.
Of the teams available they are the only ones I'd trust to challenge and beat the Storm in the prelim. Dogs are no chance and Roosters are busted plus have a terrible record against Melbourne.
No this is Manly's level. They aren't a good side
Of the 3 teams available they are the only one who have beaten Melbourne this year.
Manly have a great middle rotation and a good spine. Those are two things that the Dogs don't possess. The Roosters at full strength may have but they are busted.
They are the only team capable of the job.
Dogs could do it if they play like today with more discipline ad far as penalties go.
They'd be my second choice.
They are totally outclassed in the spine by Melbourne. In clutch moments Storm win 9.5/10.
Dogs v Penrith would be a fantastic grand final but it's a huge long shot.