What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pakistan Test bowler fined for ball-tampering

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,407
JJ said:
nobody said they were liars...

I thinkthe verdict was there was "no evidence" - wasn't it?? (you avoiding the question??)

They were either mistaken, or correct but there was no evidence...

If you were accused of a crime, would you be happy if six supposed experts got up and said - yup, I reckon he did it.... ??? and presented no other evidence...

those questions...

but you're right, the case IS closed - you're just delusional about the outcome
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
no, that was not the verdict

what kind of prosecutor would call on "supposed experts" who only "reckon" :?

what a stupid question
 
Messages
2,984
El Diablo said:
no, that was not the verdict

what kind of prosecutor would call on "supposed experts" who only "reckon" :?

what a stupid question

The 6 people who officiated in the game all had the same opinion. The only ones who opposed those opinions were the officials who wern't at the game.

JJ you know as well as I do that if Inzy was from NZ, AUS, ENG or SA he would have been guilty
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
waltzing Meninga said:
The 6 people who officiated in the game all had the same opinion. The only ones who opposed those opinions were the officials who wern't at the game.

it was official. only 1 ICC official said not guilty.


6-1 must make Inzy feel all warm and fuzzy inside
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,407
waltzing Meninga said:
The 6 people who officiated in the game all had the same opinion. The only ones who opposed those opinions were the officials who wern't at the game.

JJ you know as well as I do that if Inzy was from NZ, AUS, ENG or SA he would have been guilty

I don't know that at all...

and you're recommending that people should be found guilty on the basis of opinions? And those opinions were all on the condition of the ball - being at the game had nothing to do with it - 6 officials and 30 odd cameras saw nothing!

This is a pretty tired debate... the verdicts were 100% correct - you know that as well as I do! :D
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
152,896
JJ said:
ample opinions.... no evidence apart from a ball, which opinions were divided on

to be fair, that's hardly an illustrious bunch - not as if Bucknor and Bowden's names were there.. :D

are you really that gullible ?
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,407
the question really is, are you really that paranoid?

there is treatment available I'm sure :lol:
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,407
El Diablo said:
it was official. only 1 ICC official said not guilty.


6-1 must make Inzy feel all warm and fuzzy inside

but isn;t the argument you all make that the ICC is incompetent - but now you're saying these 6 weren't???
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
152,896
JJ said:
the question really is, are you really that paranoid?

there is treatment available I'm sure :lol:

no I'm not, and what does paranoia have do do with any of this

but you sure dont like answering questions, do you ?
 

Angry_eel

First Grade
Messages
8,644
I hair would have handled it like this i would have been with him. He just mucked it all up.

Ball tampering might be a problem in the Paki team i don't know and if it is they need to be punished.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
JJ said:
but isn;t the argument you all make that the ICC is incompetent - but now you're saying these 6 weren't???

you're just backing me up

6-1 = not guilty

7-3 = sack him

you do the maths and tell me how that makes sense
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Angry_eel said:
Ball tampering might be a problem in the Paki team i don't know and if it is they need to be punished.

yeah, they should just be allowed to get away with it :crazy:
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,407
no, evidence should be presented and discussed in a rational manner...

Shame they had no evidence apart from some opinions on the ball - anyone can have an opinion on the ball...
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
JJ said:
no, evidence should be presented and discussed in a rational manner...

Shame they had no evidence apart from some opinions on the ball - anyone can have an opinion on the ball...

and 6 thought it was tampered with

everything is an opinion ffs

it was the opinion of 1 that got him off
 

Angry_eel

First Grade
Messages
8,644
El Diablo said:
yeah, they should just be allowed to get away with it :crazy:
See thats what you want not the pakis or ICC. The player got fined and if he continues it, he will be banned. So :crazy: to you.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Angry_eel said:
See thats what you want not the pakis or ICC. The player got fined and if he continues it, he will be banned. So :crazy: to you.

he shouldve been suspended

ball tampering has to be one of the worst things you can do. fining is not a sufficient punishment imo.

and you have no idea what the ICC wanted
 

Latest posts

Top