What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Panther Player sex tape

mxlegend99

Referee
Messages
23,333
I’m amazed.... not. Panther fans not knowing the difference between being aware of being filmed and consenting to being filmed.

Except they specifically stated they weren't aware they were being filmed.

Police have been told that while the sexual acts were consensual, the women were unaware they were being filmed.

Thats from the article @Panther_Daz posted.
 

franklin2323

Immortal
Messages
33,546
I’m amazed.... not. Panther fans not knowing the difference between being aware of being filmed and consenting to being filmed.

You were there were you? It got from his phone to the others that is fact... How it got there is the question
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,887
Awareness of filming is not consent. The girl may have said no, or only if you delete it afterwards.





This is getting into very murky water isn't it. How is that proved or disproved. I suppose the only help would be that there a 2 different girls.

I want to see the player who leaked these videos done like a dogs dinner.
 

snickers007

Juniors
Messages
1,643
I’m amazed.... not. Panther fans not knowing the difference between being aware of being filmed and consenting to being filmed.

If I was mid root and a camera got pulled out - and I didn't consent to it - I'd probably stop rooting
 
Messages
21,880
You kinda think that won't stick.

According to this positive consent may be required to film someone in a private act. Ie. May will have to have asked her if he can film it.

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.c...-about-filming-someone-without-their-consent/

So if it boils down to he said v she said on that charge, it will come down to what the magistrate believes. If it makes it to a courtroom that is.


Edit: Although the link isn't quite clear, it's possible there could be implied consent in the filming. ie. If the person doesn't say no, it could imply consent.
 
Last edited:

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,887
There is a good part of me that believes May needs time on the sideline. What a cluster..... I am angry about these 'gooses' potentially ruining one of the best squads by being dickheads.

If the girls were videoed without their consent I feel for them. The deserve their day in court. I want the goose May to learn a lesson a huge one, surely after watching the Cartwright show 18 months ago. Haven't they learnt anything ?

And to the dogs who released this to the wider public. You are nothing but scum. Just like the person / folks behind NRL memes.

May does need to be stood down. I would be make him donate his pay to a womens shettler charity, and put him on broom duty over at the club. These players need to learn some respect.
 

Kilkenny

Coach
Messages
13,878
Does May need to be sacked over this ?

Or am I being way over the top and allowing anger to rule common sense ?

We understand the anger and frustration as it has the potential to harm our chances of the football field, particularly, in the early part of the season. This situation is highly disruptive whether we like it or not.

The fact of the matter is, the recording of one's sexual activities has become commonplace in today's society and in 99.9% of instances it is not an issue for obvious reasons.

Clearly making a recording without the consent of one or more participant's is a different matter and is deserving of attracting criminal sanctions and the punishment that may follow. Similarly, the distribution of recording's into the public domain has the potential to cause embarrassment and hurt so again such acts are worthy of being placed before a court.

I think any decision of the future of Tyrone May rightfully can be determined after the conclusion of the court proceedings whether his guilt or innocence is determined and the facts surrounding what transpired are more widely known.

This is not a matter that would warrant his being stood down indefinitely based on the new NRL policy outlined last week although our General Manager may have a different view and impose a club based sanction effective immediately.
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,887
We understand the anger and frustration as it has the potential to harm our chances of the football field, particularly, in the early part of the season. This situation is highly disruptive whether we like it or not.

The fact of the matter is, the recording of one's sexual activities has become commonplace in today's society and in 99.9% of instances it is not an issue for obvious reasons.

Clearly making a recording without the consent of one or more participant's is a different matter and is deserving of attracting criminal sanctions and the punishment that may follow. Similarly, the distribution of recording's into the public domain has the potential to cause embarrassment and hurt so again such acts are worthy of being placed before a court.

I think any decision of the future of Tyrone May rightfully can be determined after the conclusion of the court proceedings whether his guilt or innocence is determined and the facts surrounding what transpired are more widely known.

This is not a matter that would warrant his being stood down indefinitely based on the new NRL policy outlined last week although our General Manager may have a different view and impose a club based sanction effective immediately.




This is interesting according to CEO at this stage he will be defending the charges. Side thought Coleman this is 2nd court case. Not a good look.

https://www.nrl.com/news/2019/03/05/what-does-mays-charge-mean-for-panthers/
 

Aliceinwonderland

First Grade
Messages
7,887
Gees you guys didn't seem to concerned for the girls welfare when you were giving it to me & Magpie yesterday..



I was almost expecting this. I didn't appreciate Maghood's name calling to me.

Now lets rewind.

Yesterday it was not known that the girls didn't know they were being videoed. I could go back and check one of my posts and I know I said that 'if the girls were videoed unware' my thoughts were with them.

So nice of you to climb up to a piece of high moral ground and pass judgement.
 

Latest posts

Top