hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,867
I stand by it. The best teams are represented over the course of 26 rounds by for-and-against. And ours (and that of the Knights and Roosters) were limited by NYC players forced into first grade.
A bit of good and bad luck in the finals doesn't decide who is the best. It just decides who gets the trophy. The Warriors only beat the Broncos by two points in the grand final. Parra beat them by plenty more and at full strength beat both teams twice through the year.
Do you really think the Bulldogs were the second best team in the NRL this year?
Pou hit the nail on head....
The best team usually have best for and against. In saying that dogs are good at grinding and stopping other teams from playing football.Its not about how good they play its more about slowing the other teams attack to suit there own.As much as the storm where bad for rugby league they still mixed grind with brilliant attacking play.The dogs just do the 5 step shuffle followed by a bomb and good chase-finger crossed for a mistake and repeat.
Would you rather 17 good NYC players who become average first graders like the warriors NYC are producing and winning the comp with a team like this or a team with 1-2 gun players that go on to be very good first graders even thou your under 20's team is average.