Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 92,718
Nah Ualesi not in the same class.He was brought into NYC at age 16,he is definately no good.:roll:.
I didn't say he was no good, I said he wasn't as good as the younger forwards who were signed up earlier and were called up to first grade earlier.
As for playing NYC at 16, being an early developer doesn't mean he will develop as much as those players who have more potential.
Carving up in NYC does not equal guaranteed future first grader. The vast majority of any NYC squad (including some of the top performers) will never play first grade. A club is doing well if they get more than 2 or 3 in any given year.
Ualesi well might be good enough for first grade one day but what if that doesn't happen until he is 25 years old? Will he hang in there training fulltime for $20k-$30K for five years (that's if an NRL club wants to keep him on a second tier contract for that long) when he could get a (fulltime) job making twice that. What if, when his current contract expires at about age 22, no NRL club wants to pick him up on a second tier contract, because they'd rather take a chance on another kid out of the NYC. Does he keep developing his game for a NSW Cup club, training part-time for f**k all and working nine to five?
Kelepi Tanginoa and co don't have to worry about that for at least another two and a half years, and the science of biomechanics has already determined that these guys are almost certainties to make it in the NRL. That's why they've been on fulltime contracts since they turned 18 and Joseph Ualesi hasn't.