What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Leagues Club board sacked, administrator appointed

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...s/news-story/ff0807f553ba553f62a446df612d54bf

NRL on the nose with Eels fans

The NRL has been warned that their support could scupper the hopes of any group looking to take control of Parramatta. In finalising sanctions against the club for salary cap breaches, NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg said he would look to work with one of the three groups attempting to unseat the board at an extraordinary general meeting next month.

However, there are genuine fears the club’s supporters could take out their frustration on the game’s governing body and Greenberg in particular by voting against any NRL-backed group.

At least two of the groups have already reached out to Greenberg and the NRL as they look to garner the game’s backing. The third, led by long-time supporter, Andrew Eagleston, is expected to do the same tomorrow.

The fear is that Eels supporters are so disenfranchised by the NRL’s decision — and more particularly Greenberg because of his former job at Canterbury and his relationship with ex-Parramatta chief executive Scott Seward — that they may deliberately vote against any group with the game’s backing when the extraordinary general meeting is held late next month.

“To be frank, the NRL is a bit on the nose with the membership — not necessarily the NRL, but Greenberg in terms of where he has come from and also his association with Seward,” one source close to the groups told The Australian. “There is not many people who trust him at Parramatta. It’s almost as if the NRL endorses a process, or faction, or candidate, it might be a kiss of death with a lot of the members.

“We’re hoping they can all see through that. I think they will in the end. I think it is at a point where everyone can see it is now or never.”

Chris Losco, who has proposed a merit-based board of high-profile members, reached out to Greenberg over the weekend as he looks to forge an alliance with the game. “I would absolutely be looking for the NRL to support our process,” Losco said. “And if they don’t support us I would be questioning whether we go ahead. We need support not just from the members but the game. That’s the only way forward here. ’’

It is understood lawyer Brendon Noney, who now has the backing of former Macquarie Bank boss Bill Moss, has also made contact with the NRL.

Moss was backing a group led by Eagleston but confirmed to The Australian yesterday that he had switched because he believed Noney presented a better way forward for the club.

It is understood Noney has spoken to the NRL and outlined his plans, which would include Moss as part of an advisory group, which would be formed to advise the new directors.

“Right at the start I said I would help Brendon Noney,” Moss said.

“We then went around and met everyone. For a while Andrew wanted to work with Brendon. Basically what happened there was when we got into it and did a whole lot of due diligence, Brendon and I decided that was not the way to go.

“Brendon is a very, very smart guy. He is very well connected; he is articulate; he is smart and he understands the breadth of the problem. He understands all the issues that are going to need to be addressed going in. It’s a big issue this. This is about putting the right structures in.”

As part of their response to the NRL allegations, the Eels focused on the relationship between Greenberg and Seward, requesting the NRL chief executive excuse himself from making a decision on the club’s future.

Greenberg ultimately decided to ignore that request as he fined the club $1 million and docked them 12 premiership points. The Eels are set to reiterate their issues with Greenberg and Seward when they appeal the decision.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,704
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...s/news-story/ff0807f553ba553f62a446df612d54bf

As part of their response to the NRL allegations, the Eels focused on the relationship between Greenberg and Seward, requesting the NRL chief executive excuse himself from making a decision on the club’s future.

Greenberg ultimately decided to ignore that request as he fined the club $1 million and docked them 12 premiership points. The Eels are set to reiterate their issues with Greenberg and Seward when they appeal the decision.

Interesting times ahead.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,704
A smart man would have stepped aside to avoid claims of conflict. Toddy being mates with Seward and being mentioned in Seward's statement imply's lot's of things. Enough for Toddy to make his position as sole arbitrator to be untenable.

It may not have changed the penalty, but if the NRL wanted to be seen as being independent, then Toddy should have excused himself if only to ensure that the penalty against us sticks.
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
Is the appeal process a fresh hearing?

If so, the apprehended bias point doesn't have much (arguably any) force where there is an automatic right of review.
 

Oscarman

Juniors
Messages
1,907
Is the appeal process a fresh hearing?

If so, the apprehended bias point doesn't have much (arguably any) force where there is an automatic right of review.
It probably won't but our response might get more than a 5 second look and being chucked in the bin.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,704
It probably won't but our response might get more than a 5 second look and being chucked in the bin.
Agree. The rogue CEO concept may or may not have merit, but deserves to be heard notwithstanding.

Part of the problem we have is that the CEO has not released any written findings to the the public. All this does is leave everything open for conjecture.
 
Messages
13,876
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...s/news-story/ff0807f553ba553f62a446df612d54bf

NRL on the nose with Eels fans

The NRL has been warned that their support could scupper the hopes of any group looking to take control of Parramatta. In finalising sanctions against the club for salary cap breaches, NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg said he would look to work with one of the three groups attempting to unseat the board at an extraordinary general meeting next month.

However, there are genuine fears the club’s supporters could take out their frustration on the game’s governing body and Greenberg in particular by voting against any NRL-backed group.

At least two of the groups have already reached out to Greenberg and the NRL as they look to garner the game’s backing. The third, led by long-time supporter, Andrew Eagleston, is expected to do the same tomorrow.

The fear is that Eels supporters are so disenfranchised by the NRL’s decision — and more particularly Greenberg because of his former job at Canterbury and his relationship with ex-Parramatta chief executive Scott Seward — that they may deliberately vote against any group with the game’s backing when the extraordinary general meeting is held late next month.

“To be frank, the NRL is a bit on the nose with the membership — not necessarily the NRL, but Greenberg in terms of where he has come from and also his association with Seward,” one source close to the groups told The Australian. “There is not many people who trust him at Parramatta. It’s almost as if the NRL endorses a process, or faction, or candidate, it might be a kiss of death with a lot of the members.

“We’re hoping they can all see through that. I think they will in the end. I think it is at a point where everyone can see it is now or never.”

Chris Losco, who has proposed a merit-based board of high-profile members, reached out to Greenberg over the weekend as he looks to forge an alliance with the game. “I would absolutely be looking for the NRL to support our process,” Losco said. “And if they don’t support us I would be questioning whether we go ahead. We need support not just from the members but the game. That’s the only way forward here. ’’

It is understood lawyer Brendon Noney, who now has the backing of former Macquarie Bank boss Bill Moss, has also made contact with the NRL.

Moss was backing a group led by Eagleston but confirmed to The Australian yesterday that he had switched because he believed Noney presented a better way forward for the club.

It is understood Noney has spoken to the NRL and outlined his plans, which would include Moss as part of an advisory group, which would be formed to advise the new directors.

“Right at the start I said I would help Brendon Noney,” Moss said.

“We then went around and met everyone. For a while Andrew wanted to work with Brendon. Basically what happened there was when we got into it and did a whole lot of due diligence, Brendon and I decided that was not the way to go.

“Brendon is a very, very smart guy. He is very well connected; he is articulate; he is smart and he understands the breadth of the problem. He understands all the issues that are going to need to be addressed going in. It’s a big issue this. This is about putting the right structures in.”

As part of their response to the NRL allegations, the Eels focused on the relationship between Greenberg and Seward, requesting the NRL chief executive excuse himself from making a decision on the club’s future.

Greenberg ultimately decided to ignore that request as he fined the club $1 million and docked them 12 premiership points. The Eels are set to reiterate their issues with Greenberg and Seward when they appeal the decision.
I'm not sure that is true, I will base my decision on the merit of the 3 not which one the NRL has backed.
We don't all follow blindly like sheep.
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
It would be pretty ballsy for one of the three groups to mount their campaign as "The only candidates not endorsed by the NRL"
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,746
It would be pretty ballsy for one of the three groups to mount their campaign as "The only candidates not endorsed by the NRL"
Could be a Tampa move though if they go with "The only candidates not endorsed by the Toodster" and just cut and paste Fitzy & Spags on the slogan when needed
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
Surely all of our members have woken up to that, after the 3P trojan horse episode with Price Kenny and Grothe in late 2008 - and now the aftermath of Sharp's crew?
 

Oscarman

Juniors
Messages
1,907
Does anyone know whether the Losco proposal requires any prospective directors to be members of the Australian Institute of Company Directors? I would hope this is the case as they would have the proper grasp on their responsibilities, governance etc. It is a $50 million plus company they will be overseeing, not a local tennis club where it's only a few thousand a year being managed.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,704
Does anyone know whether the Losco proposal requires any prospective directors to be members of the Australian Institute of Company Directors? I would hope this is the case as they would have the proper grasp on their responsibilities, governance etc. It is a $50 million plus company they will be overseeing, not a local tennis club where it's only a few thousand a year being managed.

The problem I see with the merit based proposal is the (small) pool that you can select from. IIRC the applications can only be from fully paid up members 3 years+. That rules out a shitload of punters who follow the club, have a solid CV but choose not to sit in the stands or be a B&G Army member. I know that it's a constitution thing, but the small pool is very limiting.
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
It's disgraceful and the one thing that is holding us back and ensuring mediocrity prevails.

It's the first issue that any of these three groups should have as their platform.
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
I think item 1 on any agenda should be separating the PLC and PNRL boards completely.

Given that the PLC funds the NRL team, it's fair to give the PLC a number of board seats, but I would rather that they be separate things completely, so that one board does not effect the other, like it is now.
 

eel01s

Bench
Messages
3,409
The problem I see with the merit based proposal is the (small) pool that you can select from. IIRC the applications can only be from fully paid up members 3 years+. That rules out a shitload of punters who follow the club, have a solid CV but choose not to sit in the stands or be a B&G Army member. I know that it's a constitution thing, but the small pool is very limiting.
No they have to be min. 3 year paid members of the PLC. I don't think you need to be a season ticket holder.
 

Latest posts

Top