I thought I would let the dust settle on this before making a comment. But not sure the dust will ever settle on this decision.
Firstly I would like to say that I am a massive fan of Daniel Anderson. He is a high quality coach and his success he had with the Warriors and in the UK Super League was no fluke. He knows what he is doing. If he continues to be a career coach I am sure he will find a job either here in the NRL or in the UK Super League and he will more than likely win some more premierships
Second thing I would like to say is that he is a great Parramatta man and didnt deserved to be shafted the way he was. The passion and ambitions he had to be a Parramatta Premiership winning coach could never be questioned. Unfortunately it was clear that he was never given a fair go at the job and the way the board has handled things is nothing sort of disgraceful. But I will leave the board and the people on it to another day.
Having said all that. The current team of players was not responding to the coaching of Daniel Anderson and I defy anyone on this forum to justify that they were. The 2010 Parramatta first grade team were a disgusting rabble that played every game as if they had just met out in the car park an hour before the game. Someone has to be accountable for the rubbish dished out on the field by this club in 2010…..In my opinion, Daniel Anderson relied too much on the individual attacking abilities of certain players and didnt attempt to bring what abilities he had in his 25 man squad together to come up with the right game plan for the team to be successful. I certainly wouldnt blame Daniel Anderson solely for the performances of the team in the last two years. The attitude of the entire squad has a great deal to be desired. But realistically in my opinion it is the job of Head Coach to get that attitude right. In the two seasons he was at Parramatta, Daniel Anderson didn’t appear to be able to improve this attitude significantly.
For 2011 I ask myself two simple questions. Would the team have the same style, game plan, attitude and direction if Daniel Anderson remained the coach? I would say YES. Is that style, game plan, attitude, direction going to create a more successful season? I would say NO.
Unfortunately, I am actually pretty sad to say this as well, but as a result the board has no real choice but to move on from Daniel Anderson as the Head Coach of the Club. You can use the ‘getting rid of Fitzy’s mates’ excuse as much as you want, but realistically Daniel Anderson just isn’t the right person for the Parramatta Club at the stage they are at.
In my opinion, this squad of 25 players needs to be coached a certain way and it’s obvious that Daniel Anderson wasn’t able to provide that style of coaching. They require a coach that can provide a structured game plan, a clear direction and actually has to make some of the decisions for the players on the field for them. Simply, Daniel Anderson wasn’t that coach. Whether we go with Kearney, Gould, Stuart, JT, Bennett, Ray Price, Brett Kenny or even Peter Sterling, then how adaptable that coach is being able to mould the squad and harness all the abilities (and lack of) of all the squad will decide how well Parra will go in 2011.
At the end of the day, as disgraceful as it has been done, the board could not really make any other decision than the outcome they have come to. Daniel Anderson wasn’t the right person to be coaching Parramatta at this time. An even bigger decision that they now need to make is who will replace him and what sort of coach are they going to be……