Parra's next coach?

[Gronk]

So it seems that Ricky Stuart has rejected us. It worried me when I saw him on the Game Plan (or was it NRL on Fox) and he said that if he did coach a team, he'd want to be successful. I guess that rules us out because of our shit roster and losing culture.

Who's plan B then ? Jason Taylor with Mick Potter as 2IC ?

 

[hineyrulz]

So it seems that Ricky Stuart has rejected us. It worried me when I saw him on the Game Plan (or was it NRL on Fox) and he said that if he did coach a team, he'd want to be successful. I guess that rules us out because of our shit roster and losing culture.

Who's plan B then ? Jason Taylor with Mick Potter as 2IC ?

Thank f**k for that.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Stuart should know the only thing wrong with our team is poor coaching. With this roster we should be top four MINIMUM!

lol

 

[Avenger]

So it seems that Ricky Stuart has rejected us. It worried me when I saw him on the Game Plan (or was it NRL on Fox) and he said that if he did coach a team, he'd want to be successful. I guess that rules us out because of our shit roster and losing culture.

Who's plan B then ? Jason Taylor with Mick Potter as 2IC ?

How do you know he has rejected us ?

 

[The EELiminator]

nrl on fox tonight said there was a whisper that stuart was headed to canberra and a few of their players have already been put on notice which might explain their sudden improvement vs the storm

 

[Avenger]

nrl on fox tonight said there was a whisper that stuart was headed to canberra and a few of their players have already been put on notice which might explain their sudden improvement vs the storm

and then Paul Kent said that he has not signed and will listen to other offers. Personally I would only take him for a 2 year deal. My first choice would still be Jason Taylor. I am even starting to think Brad Arthur in 2013 with a full tilt on Bellamy for 2014.

 

[strider]

how do we know Brad Arthur is any good? We aren't going so well with him involved atm

 

[Eels Dude]

Brad Arthur looks more lost than Kearney when he answers facebook questions.

 

[Utey]

how do we know Brad Arthur is any good? We aren't going so well with him involved atm

Because Assvenger said so.

 

[IFR33K]

Because Assvenger said so.

Stay off the angry pills anth. It doesnt suit you.

 

[Avenger]

Because Assvenger said so.

Yawn. Keep following my posts Pycho Boy

 

[Utey]

Yawn. Keep following my posts Pycho Boy

The fact that you honestly think that a coach change will instantly transform us into premiership contenders is laughable. Although I guess the reason that I do follow your posts is that it allows me to have the odd chuckle. So carry on good sir

 

[bartman]

 

[Avenger]

The fact that you honestly think that a coach change will instantly transform us into premiership contenders is laughable. Although I guess the reason that I do follow your posts is that it allows me to have the odd chuckle. So carry on good sir

The dogs did it this year with a new coach. Brian Smith did it in 1997 with us. Instantly!! So what's your point?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

The dogs did it this year with a new coach. Brian Smith did it in 1997 with us. Instantly!! So what's your point?

Both teams had very good rosters already. Do you think Hasler would have gone to the Dogs if they were a basket case?

 

[Noise]

The fact that you honestly think that a coach change will instantly transform us into premiership contenders is laughable. Although I guess the reason that I do follow your posts is that it allows me to have the odd chuckle. So carry on good sir

Mate a coach that has us nowhere near the wooden spoon two years in a row will do fine

 

[Captain BF]

The dogs did it this year with a new coach. Brian Smith did it in 1997 with us. Instantly!! So what's your point?

While not entirely incorrect, it isn't entirely correct either. We started 1997 with a win in round 1 and then lost 5 (i think was somewhere around 4-6) on the trot. Then a big run of wins. So 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other...

 

[Avenger]

Both teams had very good rosters already. Do you think Hasler would have gone to the Dogs if they were a basket case?

In 1996 the Canterbury 4 and a stack of other great players arrived at Parra with Hilditch as the coach. We didn't make the finals. Smith then came in 1997 and we got to the finals. Change of coach = Instant success. Last year the Dogs did not make the semis with essentially the same squad Hasler has them as genuine premiership contenders. Change of coach = Instant success.

It can be done. I couldn't give a f**k about the roster. In both scenarios the common denominator was the roster. The variable was the coach. Now stop arguing for the point of arguing. Move on and tell your mate Utey that he has no f**king idea.

A change of coach can bring instant success, anyone who argues different is being stupid.

 

[Avenger]

While not entirely incorrect, it isn't entirely correct either. We started 1997 with a win in round 1 and then lost 5 (i think was somewhere around 4-6) on the trot. Then a big run of wins. So 6 of 1, half a dozen of the other...

Brian Smith got us to our first semi appearance in 10 years. Give the man some respect.

 

[eloquentEEL]

Best example is surely JT taking over in 2006