What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

News Paul Kent charged with domestic violence offences, found not guilty

Wizardman

First Grade
Messages
8,642
Rugby League soap opera...

What on earth does Rugby League have to do with Paul Kent alledgedly choking a woman?
The fact that he associates with a "soap opera" with domestic violence is a reflection of his arrogance towards a very serious society issue as well as his own self-importance in regard to rugby league.

An absolute blight on humanity. I hope he gets what is coming towards him.
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
3,646
Not sure if this is a thing I read or made up but isn't there a thing where the police prosecution can still charge the offender if they have enough evidence, despite the victim withdrawing?
Yes, but it makes it difficult depending on the rest of the evidence.

For instance, in this matter the police have taken out an AVO protecting Kent against the victim of the choke and assault charges. Meaning that the police are of the view that there was some conduct that occurred which made them believe that Kent requires protection also.

If the victim were not to attend court for what ever reason, the prosecution would have a difficult time disproving Kent's version of events, such as self defence.
 

firechild

First Grade
Messages
7,742
Not sure if this is a thing I read or made up but isn't there a thing where the police prosecution can still charge the offender if they have enough evidence, despite the victim withdrawing?
The whole process is different here than in the US. You'll never hear the question "would you like to press charges?" in Australia because it's not the victim that decides that, it's the police. If they believe there are grounds for charges, they are the ones that determine if charges are filed and what those charges are. Therefore if a witness (including the victim) changes their story, the police (including police prosecutors) only need to determine if they still have a case, they are not obliged to withdraw charges.
 

Exsilium

First Grade
Messages
9,568
Yes, but it makes it difficult depending on the rest of the evidence.

For instance, in this matter the police have taken out an AVO protecting Kent against the victim of the choke and assault charges. Meaning that the police are of the view that there was some conduct that occurred which made them believe that Kent requires protection also.

If the victim were not to attend court for what ever reason, the prosecution would have a difficult time disproving Kent's version of events, such as self defence.

Makes sense. I didn't even read the articles but it was just a thought that came to mind.

Thanks!
 
Messages
3,756
Yes, but it makes it difficult depending on the rest of the evidence.

For instance, in this matter the police have taken out an AVO protecting Kent against the victim of the choke and assault charges. Meaning that the police are of the view that there was some conduct that occurred which made them believe that Kent requires protection also.

If the victim were not to attend court for what ever reason, the prosecution would have a difficult time disproving Kent's version of events, such as self defence.
While that might get him off the charges, it would kill his career…
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,214
It's all part of the Rugby League Soap Opera...

What a pathetic response to a question about his alleged disgraceful behaviour.

Typical journo speak, using the usual hack lines to deflect from the real problem at hand.

When in doubt, blame it on RL.

If DUI was still alive she'd probably cover for Kent, blaming it on RL culture in general.
 

Latest posts

Top