How many injures have those halves had though? JT is starting to get some but the rest have limited injures. It is this grey area you don't seem to understand
Soward had back injuries most of his career. If he could go on why did he retire?
Wallace 3 ACL's numerous other injuries
Maloney games played:
2010 24 games
2011 27 games
2012 24 games
2013 23 games (Missed a few due to SOO)
2014 27 games
2015 27 games
2016 25 games (missed a few due to SOO)
2017 20 games (Missed a few with SOO)
Compare that to say younger halves in Reynolds, Hodkinson or Foran and he is durable which puts him closer to Cronk in durability
I noticed you ignored where I said what are the ave age for halves in the comp?
If Brodie Croft plays 7 for Storm he is 20 if not it is 25 yo Jacks
Cleary 20
Ash Taylor 21.
Luke Brooks and Kodi Nikorima 23
None of them will be in their peak anytime soon. So why would Hunt or Norman be different
Soward has had one semi serious injury hold him back in his career... and missing half a dozen games for it is hardly career ending.
2009 - 26 games
2010 - 26 games
2011 - 23 games
2012 - 20 games
2013 - 12 games (dragons did what Hook did. Sacked him mid season blaming him for poor coaching)
2014 - 25 games
2015 - 16 games (he had a back injury early in the season. Got his surgery and was over it by end of season)
2016 - 12 games (dropped mid season. Then released)
Exactly how is he any more injury prone than Maloney? He has a back injury that the club tried to manage instead of surgery and suddenly he's a write off because of his age? One injury that was fixed with surgery.
Peter Wallace has played in a position with a higher workload and his age hasnt hurt him. Playing while injured in 2017 did. But in 2016 he and Soward were both healthy and both younger than Maloney and alot of elite halves.
I would personally move on from Wallace now as Katoa is as good or better. Especially when Wallace decides to play through broken ribs and hands.
Blaming age and injuries is a f**king cop out. They could have led us to the top 4 under a coach who knows how to use halves.
Facts have no place in these inane rants he goes on with
You dont use facts. You make shit up. You the contradict yourself and keep trying to shift the goalposts.
Fact: Maloney is older than all our 2016 halves options were
Fact: Hook couldnt get the best out of Corey Norman
Fact: Hook couldnt get the best out of Ben Hunt (he played a grand final 12 months after Hook left)
Fact: Hook couldnt get the best out of Te Maire Martin (played a grand final 6 months later)
Fact: Hook thought Peter Wallace had nothing to offer the Broncos 5 years ago... now he's the f**king captain at 2 years older than when you said he was too old for being a half. Playing a more physically demamding position.
Fact: Hook hasn't made the top 4 without Lockyer
Youre grasping at straws to come up with reasons halves dont play their best footy under Hook. But the answer is simple. Halves look shit when there's no game plan or structure. Old. Young. In their prime. None are at their best under Hook.
Sowards only issue in 2016 was his shocking defence. We can expect more of the same from Maloney. Unless Gus is getting alot more involved theres really no reason to think Maloney will be any more successful under Hook than the other dozen or so halves who were simply solid at best.