Penalty Differentials

[betcats]

I hope the roosters don't get another penalty all season. The refs hate you, suck it up merkins.

 

[Lambretta]

I hope the roosters don't get another penalty all season. The refs hate you, suck it up merkins.

As long as the trade off is that we win every single game we play I'd go along with that.......

PS. You know it doesn't much matter if we get a penalty as all they do is give the ball to Skidsy who knocks it on :lol:

 

[betcats]

As long as the trade off is that we win every single game we play I'd go along with that.......

PS. You know it doesn't much matter if we get a penalty as all they do is give the ball to Skidsy who knocks it on :lol:

:lol: Fletch and Hindy were giving it to SKD during their interview before the test about his hands, he took it well though.

Seriously though id love for there to be some reasonable explanation for the penalty thing but it is unexplainable as far as I can tell, very strange.

 

[firechild]

I did. It seems you didn't.

Ducks are counted towards a batsman's batting avg. If a batsman scores 0, 0, 0 - he averages 0. Hard to believe, I know. And if his next score is 1, he averages 0.25, not 1. Mind boggling stuff, right?!

Yeah, but before he scored the 1, he wouldn't have had 3 "streaks" of 0.

Don't get me wrong, I'm in the "something fishy" camp with respect to the way penalties don't get awarded to the Rorters but geniuss like yourself with your meaningless "statistics" are doing nothing to convince anyone. Leave it to the few fans with half a brain to explain things.

 

[Lambretta]

:lol: Fletch and Hindy were giving it to SKD during their interview before the test about his hands, he took it well though.

My mates and I call Skidsy flipper for obvious reasons

 

[Tommy Smith]

Yeah, but before he scored the 1, he wouldn't have had 3 "streaks" of 0.

Don't get me wrong, I'm in the "something fishy" camp with respect to the way penalties don't get awarded to the Rorters but geniuss like yourself with your meaningless "statistics" are doing nothing to convince anyone. Leave it to the few fans with half a brain to explain things.

Thanks for the advice. I'll keep it in mind.

2014 ? Rnd 9, 2015: Number of times 8 or more penalties received in a match:-
E.g. 12/33 (36.3%) -- no. of times 8 or more received/no. of matches played (% of games during which 8 or more pens were received)

Brisbane ? 12/34 (35.3%)
Canberra ? 8/33 (24.2%)
Canterbury ? 12/37 (32.4%)
Cronulla ? 13/33 (39.4%)
Gold Coast ? 16/33 (48.5%)
Manly ? 10/35 (28.6%)
Melbourne ? 14/34 (41.2%)
New Zealand ? 11/33 (33.3%)
Newcastle ? 11/33 (33.3%)
North QLD ? 13/35 (37.1%)
Parramatta ? 7/33 (21.2%)
Penrith ? 17/35 (48.6%)
Souths ? 17/36 (47.2%)
St George Illa ? 11/33 (33.3%)
Syd Roosters ? 1/36 (2.8%)
Wests Tigers ? 15/33 (45.5%)

League Avg. minus Roosters ? 187/510 (36.7%)
Sydney Roosters ----------------1/36 (2.8%)

A meaningless statistic, indeed.

 

[mave]

Meaningless stat no.2........mini loves the D

 

[Dutchy]

Taking Roosters out to skew the stats to suit your agenda I see.

 

[Tommy Smith]

Not sure if serious...

 

[Unscrupulous]

Holy f**king shit. 2.8%. Nearly fell off my chair. I knew it was gonna be bad but my god LOL

It honestly feels like at least one team in a game just about always gets 8 or more too.

 

[The Elephant In The room]

Another penalty count won by the Roosters. Myth busted.

 

[Dutchy]

But they didn't receive 8....

 

[The Elephant In The room]

But they didn't receive 8....

But they did receive 50% more penalties than any other team playing tonight. It's a conspiracy.

 

[Dutchy]

I'd still like to hear from Pommy Tommy.

 

[Valheru]

What do you mean “another penalty count won”? The word another implies a previous success, it was the first we have won this season.

Well deserved as well.

 

[Cockosh]

Again, only 1 2nd Half penalty for the Chooks. To be fair Dogs didn't get one. Unusual for them, the norm for us.

That is 15 in 10 games.

 

[Hazardous]

Again, only 1 2nd Half penalty for the Chooks. To be fair Dogs didn't get one. Unusual for them, the norm for us.

That is 15 in 10 games.

Unusual for the Dogs? You have no idea..

 

[The Roosters Flair]

What do you mean ?another penalty count won?? The word another implies a previous success, it was the first we have won this season.

Well deserved as well.

You shouldn't bother trying to reason with the f**ktards, you are wasting your time!! Not only do we get f**ked over by the refs when it comes to penalties, as well as lol@$ouff$ getting favorable treatment as the stats prove, the judiciary and match review committee love to also f**k us over and give lol@$ouff$ favorable treatment!! Just take a look at what happened on the weekend with what McInnes did to Finucane to leave him concussed, and he doesn't get charged. What McInnes did was twice as bad as what Sam Moa got suspended for on Alex Glen earlier this year!!

The favorable treatment lol@$ouff$ continually get from the nrl going on 4 years now is beyond a f**king joke!!

 

[Cockosh]

While I'm at lets debunk the whole "Roosters give away penalties on purpose defending their own line, to reset their defence" myth.

69 penalties conceded in 10 games.
Only 24 penalties conceded in their own half (8 vs Cowboys)
11 penalties conceded inside their own 20 ( 4 vs Cowboys)
45 penalties conceded in the oppositions half
28 of these inside the oppositions 25 metres
41% of all Roosters penalties conceded are inside the oppositions 25m.

Talk about piggybacks!

 

[The Roosters Flair]

Unusual for the Dogs? You have no idea..

Are you saying that the dogs regularly don't get penalties in the second half of games? I don't know the stats on that, but I strongly doubt it.