So spending more on what produces more nrl players isn’t it ? Lmaoit’s elite pathways and is focused on a very tiny % of young players.
grassroots is all age age groups of amateur players outside of nrl pathways. The two exist for very different purposes and are very different things.
nrl clubs responsible for elite pathways, LC spend on grassroots and elite pathways to very variable amounts,
arlc responsible and spends on grassroots.
To say it’s ok arlc is spending less on grassroots as nrl clubs are spending more on elite pathways is total nonsense.
spend more on participants to look good in the annual report
sounds like the nrl way saves a lot of money tbh