t-ba
Post Whore
- Messages
- 59,896
Canberra wasn't a rugby league city to the same degree as Brisbane and Sydney. Fumbleball and rugby union were strongly supported in the region.
In the city sure, in the region no. Canberra's got a large transient population. Civil Servants from the South follow Australian football and historically civil servants from the Northern states would have gone through schooling where Union was the premier sport. Places like Quaenbeyan and Goulburn are solidly league country and have been since any of us have been alive. Somewhere around Wagga is the traditional dividing line but in the 1980s even a dude like Wayne Carey played more league than AFL there.
It's not a like for like comparison. You're comparing a team that played in a small NSW town because Arthurson and Quayle gave the Broncos exclusivity over SEQ. Tweed Heads is on the far outskirts of the Gold Coast metropolitan area.
North Sydney didn't play on the far outskirts of their region. If they played one suburb over in Sea Eagles territory then you might have a valid point.
Coollangatta is literally one suburb over from Tweed Heads dude.
You were going on about people from Coolangatta and Tweed Heads travelling across the border every day for work and to a lesser extent for leisure and dating. Reread what you said if you don't believe me.
Travelling every day for work counts as "people regularly travel between".
Yeah, they do. They also travel regularly between Tweed Heads and Burleigh, Some people *Gasp* even travel between their nice house and Kingscliff and the Southport Courthouse!
Bringing up Cooly and Tweed is just to point out how ridiculous the assertion that Tweed Heads is somehow not part of the Gold Coast area. It clearly is. It's bloody closer the more central parts of the city than say Penrith is to the centre of Sydney but only a weirdo would assert that that isn't part of Sydney.
The constant bringing up of Cooly is to show the assertion that the QLD GC and Tweed Heads are somehow these hugely different places is an insane notion.
No different to every other city. There were nine BRL clubs and their various fan bases had intense rivalries. Many of those rivalries still exist. Go to Kougari Oval for a Wynnum vs Easts or Wynnum vs Redcliffe game and see the tension between the two groups of supporters.
Well it is, because the national competition emerged out of that city, like Melbourne did for the AFL.
Yeah, and they lost currency to the Sydney Clubs because of $$$$. At the end of the day, like Perth and Adelaide in the AFL, the local state league clubs lost ground to the big money league.
I've been to a bunch of QRL games mate. I lived in Queensland, I'm a Souths Fan. Like no offence to Brisbane, but outside of Redcliffe no club has a distinct regional identity like Cronulla, Saints, Manly or Norths had.
That's just how the geography and history of the places work.
I mean, look at Valleys and Brothers. What exactly is the difference between those two geographically? Where exactly is the cut off the between Easts and Souths territory in Brisbane? Can any club besides Redcliffe point to a cut off point as distinctive as the Lane Cover River/Sydney Harbour/Middle Harbour, The Georges River or the Spit?
District Rugby League in Brisbane was nothing remotely like District Rugby League in Sydney either.
I used to go into the Queensland State Library to research the history of the Scorpions. I had a quick look at the TV guide that was in the Courier-Mail pre-1988. Broadcast times for the NSWRL weren't that great. There was more BRL/Statewide League broadcast on TV and at better viewing times.
The BRL grand final was always a sell out. The 6pm news focused on the BRL. There's video clips on YouTube on a channel called bashuppark that confirms this.
In 1987 it definitely wasn't.
31 minutes in, guessing around 25k which was 'very good considering the activity going on in Brisbane. Watch the video, can see the gaps.
Origin drew 33k twice that year.
Through the years, by the mid 1980s, Grand Final attendances were consistently under 30k.
1981 Brisbane Rugby League season - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's unfair to compare from 1988 because of the Broncos, but those crowds were definitely falling for Grand Finals. Certainly not 'selling out every year' which is a preposterous claim in the face of reality.
It's the same thing. And you couldn't find several out of Sydney clubs to support your argument, could you?
Several and a ton of are not the same thing. This is basic reading comprehension mate.
But okay. 'several' is a small number higher than two.
'A ton of' is an idiom describing a large amount of something.
These are very different terms.
You said Bears beat Warriors in 1998, which means Warriors beat Bears in 95, 96, 97 and 99.
Cowboys always beat the Bears.
Broncos always beat the Bears.
Raiders beat the Bears 6 times out of 10.
Rams beat the Bears in 1997.
Reds beat the Bears in 95.
Fans turned away from Rams and Reds when it was evident they had no future.
Knights always beat the Bears.
Crushers beat the Bears in 95 and 96. Fans turned off in 97 as they knew the club was cooked.
The only clubs Bears regularly beat were the Giants/Seagulls/Chargers and Steelers. That's not several. That's just a couple.
So they always had better attendances than the Seagulls, better attendances than the Steelers and regularly had better attendances than a combination of the Crushers/Raiders/Warriors/Rams and Reds.
That's several mate.
And 'a ton' and several are not remotely synonyms lol. Please English Better.
Look up the Sharks at Kareela site.
The Sharks at Kareela now cover the financial reports of the North Queensland Cowboys?
Wow!
Last edited: